Car comparison

Seat Exeo ST · Facelift 2011 2.0 TSIvsVolvo V50 · Facelift 2007 2.5 T5

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Seat Exeo ST · Facelift 2011

2.0 TSI

211 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedWagon / estate2011-2012
VS

Volvo V50 · Facelift 2007

2.5 T5

230 hp2521 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedWagon / estate2007-2012

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.3 s
  • Fastest top speed
    239 km/h
    149 mph
  • Highest torque
    320 Nm
    236 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,490 kg
    3,285 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.0 L/100 km
    33.6 mpg US
    40.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    9.7 L/100 km
    24.2 mpg US
    29.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.4 L/100 km
    43.6 mpg US
    52.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    162 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,000 km
    621 mi
  • Largest trunk
    422 L
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best performance score
    53/100
  • Best economy score
    88/100
  • Best practicality score
    81/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIVolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5
Power
211hp157kW
230hp172kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
320Nm236lb-ft
Curb weight
1,490kg3,285lb
1,492kg3,289lb
Gross weight
2,050kg4,519lb
2,050kg4,519lb
Top speed
239 km/h
149 mph
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
71.4s99% target: 237 km/h / 147 mph
Calculated
71.4s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.3s
7.6s
0-200 km/h
26.4s
Calculated
28.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.0s
Calculated
7.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK
14.3L/100 km16.4mpg US19.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.2s
Calculated
15.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
142hp/t106kW/t64hp/1000 lb
Calculated
154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton
Calculated
214Nm/t144lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,000km621mi
Calculated
574km357mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
2,521cc154cu in
Length
4,666mm184in
4,522mm178in
Width
1,772mm70in
1,770mm70in
Height
1,454mm57in
1,457mm57in
Wheelbase
2,642mm104in
2,640mm104in
Front track
1,522mm60in
1,535mm60in
Rear track
1,523mm60in
1,531mm60in
Trunk volume
422L
417L
Max trunk volume
1,354L
1,307L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
70L
58L
CO2 emissions
162g/km
241g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSIVolvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.5 T5PowerTorque
  • Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.5 T5: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI4,600-6,000 rpm1,500-4,600 rpm6,250 rpm
VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T55,000 rpm1,500-5,000 rpm5,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIVolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.0 s
7.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.3 s
7.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
26.4 s
28.0 s
Top speed
239 km/h
149 mph
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.1 s
10.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.9 s
13.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.2 s
15.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
158 km/h
98 mph
155 km/h
97 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
211 hp
157 kW
VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5
230 hp
172 kW

Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.5 T5 has 19 hp more than Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI and Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.5 T5: 19 hp (14 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5
320 Nm
236 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
1,490 kg
3,285 lb
VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5
1,492 kg
3,289 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
239 km/h
149 mph
VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI7.3 s
VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T57.6 s

Although Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.5 T5 has more power, Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI and Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.5 T5: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5
10.1 L/100 km
23.3 mpg US
28.0 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI and Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.5 T5: 3.1 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
142 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5
154 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
1,000 km
621 mi
VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5
574 km
357 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
211 hp
157 kW
7.3 s
239 km/h
149 mph
VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5
230 hp
172 kW
7.6 s
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
Power
211 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
239 km/h
149 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
422 L
14.9 cu ft
Length
4,666 mm
183.7 in
Height
1,454 mm
57.2 in
VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5
Power
230 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
417 L
14.7 cu ft
Length
4,522 mm
178.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
Power
211 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
239 km/h
149 mph
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5
Power
230 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
10.1 L/100 km
23.3 mpg US
28.0 mpg UK

Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
7.3 s
VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5
10.1 L/100 km
23.3 mpg US
28.0 mpg UK
7.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
142 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5
154 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
10.1 L/100 km
23.3 mpg US
28.0 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIVolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5
Power
211 hp
157 kW
230 hp
172 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.3 s
7.6 s
Top speed
239 km/h
149 mph
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Lightness
1,490 kg
3,285 lb
1,492 kg
3,289 lb
Fuel consumption
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
10.1 L/100 km
23.3 mpg US
28.0 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
422 L
14.9 cu ft
Length
4,666 mm
183.7 in
Height
1,454 mm
57.2 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
417 L
14.7 cu ft
Length
4,522 mm
178.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in
Range score
1,000 km
621 mi
574 km
357 mi
CO2 score
162 g/km
241 g/km
Trunk score
422 L
14.9 cu ft
417 L
14.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
142 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
154 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSeat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSIVolvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.5 T5
Consumption7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.25 LC100 km17.68 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi19.71 LC100 mi28.45 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal1,515 L400 US gal333 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,838 LC/year2,651 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI

  • Is 2 kg lighter
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 3.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 426 km (265 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 5 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 79 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power

Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.5 T5

  • Has 19 hp more
  • Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI
Volvo V50 2.5 T5
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsSeatExeo ST2.0 TSI
2.5 T5
2.5 T5
VS
VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5vsVolvoV502.5 T5
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsSeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
2.5 T5
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5vsVolvoV70 III2.0 T5
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsSeatExeo2.0 TSI
2.5 T5
3.0 T6
VS
VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5vsVolvoXC70 II3.0 T6
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsSeatLeon III ST2.0 TDI
2.5 T5
2.5T
VS
VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5vsVolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T
2.0 TSI
1.8 TSI
VS
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsSeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI
2.5 T5
2.4 D5
VS
VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5vsVolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsSeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI
2.5 T5
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5vsVolvoV902.0 T5
Seat Exeo ST · Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI vs Volvo V50 · Facelift 2007 2.5 T5 - car comparison - FastVsFaster