Volvo V50 · Facelift 2007
Car comparison
Volvo V50 · Facelift 2007 2.5 T5vsVolvo V70 II · Facelift 2004 2.5T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo V70 II · Facelift 2004
2.5T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.5 T5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph Unrestricted225 km/h140 mph Restricted
- Most powerful230 hp172 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lightest1,492 kg3,289 lb
- Best power-to-weight154 hp/t115 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score53/100
- Best economy score80/100
Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.6 L/100 km17.3 mpg US20.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range727 km452 mi
- Largest trunk485 L
- Best practicality score83/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 230hp172kW | 210hp157kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,492kg3,289lb | 1,666kg3,673lb |
| Gross weight | 2,050kg4,519lb | 2,200kg4,850lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 71.4s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 72.5s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.0s Calculated | 32.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.3L/100 km16.4mpg US19.8mpg UK | 13.6L/100 km17.3mpg US20.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated | 126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 214Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated | 192Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 574km357mi Calculated | 727km452mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,521cc154cu in | 2,521cc154cu in |
| Length | 4,522mm178in | 4,710mm185in |
| Width | 1,770mm70in | 1,804mm71in |
| Height | 1,457mm57in | 1,490mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,640mm104in | 2,755mm108in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | 1,551mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,531mm60in | 1,548mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 417L | 485L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,307L | 1,641L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 72L |
| CO2 emissions | 241g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.5 T5: Power / Torque
- Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-5,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.0 s | 32.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 155 km/h 97 mph | 152 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 230 hp 172 kW |
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 210 hp 157 kW |
Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.5 T5 has 20 hp more than Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T and Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.5 T5: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 1,492 kg 3,289 lb |
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 1,666 kg 3,673 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 225 km/h 140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 7.6 s |
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 7.6 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 574 km 357 mi |
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 727 km 452 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 230 hp 172 kW | 7.6 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 210 hp 157 kW | 7.6 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 |
| 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T |
| 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.5 T5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 230 hp 172 kW | 210 hp 157 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,492 kg 3,289 lb | 1,666 kg 3,673 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 574 km 357 mi | 727 km 452 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 241 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 417 L 14.7 cu ft | 485 L 17.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.5 T5 | Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28 mpg UK | 9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.68 LC100 km | 17.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.45 LC100 mi | 27.88 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,515 L400 US gal333 UK gal | 1,485 L392 US gal327 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,651 LC/year | 2,599 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.5 T5
- Has 20 hp more
- Is 174 kg lighter
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 28 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 153 km (95 mi) more estimated range
- Has 68 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























