Car comparison

Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 TvsVolvo V70 II · Facelift 2004 2.5T

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Cadillac BLS Wagon

2.0 T

210 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedWagon / estate2007-2009
VS

Volvo V70 II · Facelift 2004

2.5T

210 hp2521 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedWagon / estate2004-2007

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T

  • Fastest top speed
    230 km/h
    143 mph Unrestricted
    220 km/h
    137 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    210 hp
    157 kW
  • Lightest
    1,535 kg
    3,384 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    137 hp/t
    102 kW/t
    7.3 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.3 L/100 km
    28.3 mpg US
    34.0 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    11.5 L/100 km
    20.5 mpg US
    24.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.5 L/100 km
    36.2 mpg US
    43.5 mpg UK
  • Best performance score
    50/100
  • Best economy score
    85/100

Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.6 s
  • Highest torque
    320 Nm
    236 lb-ft
  • Best estimated range
    727 km
    452 mi
  • Largest trunk
    485 L
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best practicality score
    83/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCadillacBLS Wagon2.0 TVolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T
Power
210hp157kW
210hp157kW
Torque
300Nm221lb-ft
320Nm236lb-ft
Curb weight
1,535kg3,384lb
1,666kg3,673lb
Gross weight
2,080kg4,586lb
2,200kg4,850lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Calculated
225 km/h
140 mph
To 99% top speed
75.7s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
72.5s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.8s
7.6s
0-200 km/h
31.2s
Calculated
32.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.4s
Calculated
7.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK
9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK
13.6L/100 km17.3mpg US20.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.6s
Calculated
15.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb
Calculated
126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
195Nm/t131lb-ft/ton
Calculated
192Nm/t129lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
699km434mi
Calculated
727km452mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
2,521cc154cu in
Length
4,716mm186in
4,710mm185in
Width
1,802mm71in
1,804mm71in
Height
1,543mm61in
1,490mm59in
Wheelbase
2,675mm105in
2,755mm108in
Front track
1,524mm60in
1,551mm61in
Rear track
1,506mm59in
1,548mm61in
Ground clearance
127mm5in
-
Trunk volume
419L
485L
Max trunk volume
1,273L
1,641L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
58L
72L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 TVolvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5TPowerTorque
  • Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T: Power / Torque
  • Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T5,300 rpm2,500-4,000 rpm5,550 rpm
VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T5,000 rpm1,500-4,500 rpm5,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCadillacBLS Wagon2.0 TVolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.4 s
7.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.8 s
7.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
31.2 s
32.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Likely limited
225 km/h
140 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.3 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.2 s
13.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.6 s
15.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
152 km/h
94 mph
152 km/h
94 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
210 hp
157 kW
VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T
210 hp
157 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T
320 Nm
236 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
1,535 kg
3,384 lb
VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T
1,666 kg
3,673 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T
225 km/h
140 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T7.8 s
VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T7.6 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T and Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T
9.9 L/100 km
23.8 mpg US
28.5 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T and Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T: 1.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
137 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
699 km
434 mi
VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T
727 km
452 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
210 hp
157 kW
7.8 s
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T
210 hp
157 kW
7.6 s
225 km/h
140 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
419 L
14.8 cu ft
Length
4,716 mm
185.7 in
Height
1,543 mm
60.7 in
VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
485 L
17.1 cu ft
Length
4,710 mm
185.4 in
Height
1,490 mm
58.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
9.9 L/100 km
23.8 mpg US
28.5 mpg UK

Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
7.8 s
VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T
9.9 L/100 km
23.8 mpg US
28.5 mpg UK
7.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
137 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
9.9 L/100 km
23.8 mpg US
28.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCadillacBLS Wagon2.0 TVolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T
Power
210 hp
157 kW
210 hp
157 kW
Torque
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.8 s
7.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
225 km/h
140 mph
Lightness
1,535 kg
3,384 lb
1,666 kg
3,673 lb
Fuel consumption
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
9.9 L/100 km
23.8 mpg US
28.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
419 L
14.8 cu ft
Length
4,716 mm
185.7 in
Height
1,543 mm
60.7 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
485 L
17.1 cu ft
Length
4,710 mm
185.4 in
Height
1,490 mm
58.7 in
Range score
699 km
434 mi
727 km
452 mi
Trunk score
419 L
14.8 cu ft
485 L
17.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
137 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleCadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 TVolvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T
Consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.53 LC100 km17.33 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi23.38 LC100 mi27.88 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal1,485 L392 US gal327 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,179 LC/year2,599 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T

  • Is 131 kg lighter
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Smallest trunk

Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T

  • Has 20 Nm more
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 28 km (18 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 66 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T
Volvo V70 II 2.5T
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 T
2.8 T V6
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 TvsCadillacBLS2.8 T V6
2.5T
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5TvsVolvoV70 III2.0 T5
2.0 T
2.4 JTDM 20V
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 TvsAlfa Romeo159 Sportwagon2.4 JTDM 20V
2.5T
R 2.5i V20
VS
VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5TvsVolvoV70 IIR 2.5i V20
2.0 T
2.5T
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 TvsVolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T
2.5T
2.5 T5
VS
VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5TvsVolvoV502.5 T5
2.0 T
2.0 i 16V GT
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 TvsRenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT
2.5T
2.4 D5
VS
VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5TvsVolvoV50Facelift 20072.4 D5
2.0 T
1.6 RC
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 TvsPeugeot207 SW1.6 RC
2.0 T
2.0 TSI
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.0 TvsSeatExeo ST2.0 TSI
2.5T
2.5 i V6 24V Sport
VS
VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5TvsJaguarX-Type Estate2.5 i V6 24V Sport
2.5T
2.4 D5
VS
VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5TvsVolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5
Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.0 T vs Volvo V70 II · Facelift 2004 2.5T - car comparison - FastVsFaster