Seat Exeo ST
Car comparison
Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI · Stage 3vsSeat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI · Stage 2vsSeat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI · Stage 1vsSeat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSeat Exeo ST
2.0 TSI (Stage 2)
Seat Exeo ST
2.0 TSI (Stage 1)
Seat Exeo ST
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI (Stage 3) 300 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Fastest top speed274 km/h170 mph
- Most powerful300 hp224 kW
- Highest torque434 Nm320 lb-ft
- Lightest1,490 kg3,285 lb
- Best power-to-weight201 hp/t150 kW/t5.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range886 km551 mi
- Largest trunk442 L
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score67/100
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI (Stage 3)300 hp | SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI (Stage 2)260 hp | SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI (Stage 1)236 hp | SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI200 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300hp224kW+100 hp | 260hp194kW+60 hp | 236hp176kW+36 hp | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 434Nm320lb-ft+154 Nm | 378Nm279lb-ft+98 Nm | 342Nm252lb-ft+62 Nm | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,490kg3,285lb | 1,490kg3,285lb | 1,490kg3,285lb | 1,490kg3,285lb |
| Gross weight | 2,050kg4,519lb | 2,050kg4,519lb | 2,050kg4,519lb | 2,050kg4,519lb |
| Top speed | 274 km/h 170 mph | 260 km/h 162 mph | 252 km/h 157 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 62.6s99% target: 271 km/h / 169 mph-10.9 s Calculated | 66.8s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph-6.6 s Calculated | 70.0s99% target: 249 km/h / 155 mph-3.4 s Calculated | 73.4s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s-1.7 s | 6.5s-1.1 s | 6.9s-0.8 s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.4s-11.2 s Calculated | 20.4s-8.2 s Calculated | 22.7s-5.8 s Calculated | 28.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s-1.6 s Calculated | 6.2s-1.1 s Calculated | 6.5s-0.7 s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK | 11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK | 11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK | 11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.8s-1.6 s Calculated | 14.4s-1.1 s Calculated | 14.8s-0.7 s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 201hp/t150kW/t91hp/1000 lb Calculated | 174hp/t130kW/t79hp/1000 lb Calculated | 158hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated | 134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 291Nm/t195lb-ft/ton Calculated | 254Nm/t170lb-ft/ton Calculated | 229Nm/t153lb-ft/ton Calculated | 188Nm/t126lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 886km551mi Calculated | 886km551mi Calculated | 886km551mi Calculated | 886km551mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,670mm184in | 4,670mm184in | 4,670mm184in | 4,670mm184in |
| Width | 1,772mm70in | 1,772mm70in | 1,772mm70in | 1,772mm70in |
| Height | 1,430mm56in | 1,430mm56in | 1,430mm56in | 1,430mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,642mm104in | 2,642mm104in | 2,642mm104in | 2,642mm104in |
| Front track | 1,522mm60in | 1,522mm60in | 1,522mm60in | 1,522mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,523mm60in | 1,523mm60in | 1,523mm60in | 1,523mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 442L | 442L | 442L | 442L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,354L | 1,354L | 1,354L | 1,354L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 70L | 70L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI (Stage 3) 300 hp: Power / Torque
- Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI (Stage 2) 260 hp: Power / Torque
- Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI (Stage 1) 236 hp: Power / Torque
- Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI 200 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI (Stage 3)300 hp | 5,700 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 5,950 rpm |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI (Stage 2)260 hp | 5,700 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 5,950 rpm |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI (Stage 1)236 hp | 5,700 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 5,950 rpm |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI200 hp | 5,700 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 5,950 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI (Stage 3)300 hp | SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI (Stage 2)260 hp | SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI (Stage 1)236 hp | SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI200 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 6.2 s | 6.5 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 6.5 s | 6.9 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.4 s | 20.4 s | 22.7 s | 28.5 s |
| Top speed | 274 km/h 170 mph | 260 km/h 162 mph | 252 km/h 157 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.5 s | 6.7 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 9.6 s | 9.8 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.7 s | 12.2 s | 12.5 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.8 s | 14.4 s | 14.8 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 178 km/h 110 mph | 169 km/h 105 mph | 164 km/h 102 mph | 155 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI (Stage 3)300 hp | 300 hp 224 kW |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI (Stage 2)260 hp | 260 hp 194 kW |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI (Stage 1)236 hp | 236 hp 176 kW |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI200 hp | 200 hp 149 kW |
Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI (Stage 3) 300 hp has 100 hp more than Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI 200 hp.
The biggest power difference is between Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI 200 hp and Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI (Stage 3) 300 hp: 100 hp (75 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI (Stage 3)300 hp | 434 Nm 320 lb-ft |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI (Stage 2)260 hp | 378 Nm 279 lb-ft |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI (Stage 1)236 hp | 342 Nm 252 lb-ft |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI200 hp | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI (Stage 3)300 hp | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI (Stage 2)260 hp | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI (Stage 1)236 hp | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI200 hp | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI (Stage 3)300 hp | 274 km/h 170 mph |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI (Stage 2)260 hp | 260 km/h 162 mph |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI (Stage 1)236 hp | 252 km/h 157 mph |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI200 hp | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI (Stage 3)300 hp | 5.9 s |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI (Stage 2)260 hp | 6.5 s |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI (Stage 1)236 hp | 6.9 s |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI200 hp | 7.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI (Stage 3) 300 hp and Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI 200 hp: 1.7 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI (Stage 2) 260 hp and Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI (Stage 1) 236 hp, separated by only 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI (Stage 3)300 hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI (Stage 2)260 hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI (Stage 1)236 hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI200 hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI (Stage 3)300 hp | 201 hp/t 150 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI (Stage 2)260 hp | 174 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI (Stage 1)236 hp | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI200 hp | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI (Stage 3)300 hp | 886 km 551 mi |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI (Stage 2)260 hp | 886 km 551 mi |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI (Stage 1)236 hp | 886 km 551 mi |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI200 hp | 886 km 551 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI (Stage 3)300 hp | 300 hp 224 kW | 5.9 s | 274 km/h 170 mph |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI (Stage 2)260 hp | 260 hp 194 kW | 6.5 s | 260 km/h 162 mph |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI (Stage 1)236 hp | 236 hp 176 kW | 6.9 s | 252 km/h 157 mph |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI200 hp | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.6 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI (Stage 3)300 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI (Stage 2)260 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI (Stage 1)236 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI200 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI (Stage 3)300 hp |
| 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI (Stage 2)260 hp |
| 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI (Stage 1)236 hp |
| 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI200 hp |
| 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI (Stage 3) 300 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI (Stage 3)300 hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI (Stage 2)260 hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI (Stage 1)236 hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI200 hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI (Stage 3)300 hp | 201 hp/t 150 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI (Stage 2)260 hp | 174 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI (Stage 1)236 hp | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI200 hp | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI (Stage 3)300 hp | SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI (Stage 2)260 hp | SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI (Stage 1)236 hp | SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI200 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp 224 kW | 260 hp 194 kW | 236 hp 176 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 434 Nm 320 lb-ft | 378 Nm 279 lb-ft | 342 Nm 252 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 6.5 s | 6.9 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 274 km/h 170 mph | 260 km/h 162 mph | 252 km/h 157 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 886 km 551 mi | 886 km 551 mi | 886 km 551 mi | 886 km 551 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 442 L 15.6 cu ft | 442 L 15.6 cu ft | 442 L 15.6 cu ft | 442 L 15.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 201 hp/t 150 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 174 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI (Stage 3) 300 hp | Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI (Stage 2) 260 hp | Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI (Stage 1) 236 hp | Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI 200 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.83 LC100 km | 13.83 LC100 km | 13.83 LC100 km | 13.83 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,074 LC/year | 2,074 LC/year | 2,074 LC/year | 2,074 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI (Stage 3) 300 hp
- Has 40 hp more
- Has 56 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 14 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 27 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI (Stage 2) 260 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























