Seat Exeo ST
Car comparison
Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSIvsRenault Megane III Grandtour GT 2.0 TCe
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Megane III Grandtour
GT 2.0 TCe
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Best power-to-weight134 hp/t100 kW/t7.5 kg/hp
- Best estimated range886 km551 mi
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score86/100
Renault Megane III Grandtour GT 2.0 TCe
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Lightest1,391 kg3,067 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Largest trunk524 L
- Best practicality score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,490kg3,285lb | 1,391kg3,067lb |
| Gross weight | 2,050kg4,519lb | 1,884kg4,154lb |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 73.4s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 73.9s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 8.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.5s Calculated | 33.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 7.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated | 129hp/t96kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 188Nm/t126lb-ft/ton Calculated | 216Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 886km551mi Calculated | 779km484mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,670mm184in | 4,559mm179in |
| Width | 1,772mm70in | 1,766mm70in |
| Height | 1,430mm56in | 1,461mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,642mm104in | 2,703mm106in |
| Front track | 1,522mm60in | 1,546mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,523mm60in | 1,547mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 120mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 442L | 524L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,354L | 1,595L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 178g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Renault Megane III Grandtour GT 2.0 TCe: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 5,700 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 5,950 rpm |
| RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe | 5,500 rpm | 2,250 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 7.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 8.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.5 s | 33.2 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 155 km/h 96 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
| RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe | 180 hp 134 kW |
Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI has 20 hp more than Renault Megane III Grandtour GT 2.0 TCe.
The biggest power difference is between Renault Megane III Grandtour GT 2.0 TCe and Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb |
| RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe | 1,391 kg 3,067 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe | 225 km/h 140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 7.6 s |
| RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe | 8.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI and Renault Megane III Grandtour GT 2.0 TCe: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
| RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 886 km 551 mi |
| RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe | 779 km 484 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.6 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.0 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI |
| 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
| RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 8.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb | 1,391 kg 3,067 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 886 km 551 mi | 779 km 484 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 178 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 442 L 15.6 cu ft | 524 L 18.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI | Renault Megane III Grandtour GT 2.0 TCe |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.83 LC100 km | 13.48 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,074 LC/year | 2,021 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI
- Has 20 hp more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 107 km (66 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Renault Megane III Grandtour GT 2.0 TCe
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 99 kg lighter
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 82 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























