Seat Exeo ST
Car comparison
Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSIvsVolvo V50 · Facelift 2007 2.5 T5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo V50 · Facelift 2007
2.5 T5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Lightest1,490 kg3,285 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range886 km551 mi
- Largest trunk442 L
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.5 T5
- Most powerful230 hp172 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight154 hp/t115 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score53/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 230hp172kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,490kg3,285lb | 1,492kg3,289lb |
| Gross weight | 2,050kg4,519lb | 2,050kg4,519lb |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 73.4s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 71.4s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.5s Calculated | 28.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK | 14.3L/100 km16.4mpg US19.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated | 154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 188Nm/t126lb-ft/ton Calculated | 214Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 886km551mi Calculated | 574km357mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 2,521cc154cu in |
| Length | 4,670mm184in | 4,522mm178in |
| Width | 1,772mm70in | 1,770mm70in |
| Height | 1,430mm56in | 1,457mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,642mm104in | 2,640mm104in |
| Front track | 1,522mm60in | 1,535mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,523mm60in | 1,531mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 442L | 417L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,354L | 1,307L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 58L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 241g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.5 T5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 5,700 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 5,950 rpm |
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-5,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.5 s | 28.0 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 155 km/h 96 mph | 155 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 230 hp 172 kW |
Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.5 T5 has 30 hp more than Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI and Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.5 T5: 30 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb |
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 1,492 kg 3,289 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 7.6 s |
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 7.6 s |
Although Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.5 T5 has more power, Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI and Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.5 T5: 2.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 886 km 551 mi |
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 574 km 357 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.6 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 230 hp 172 kW | 7.6 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI |
| 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 |
| 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.5 T5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 230 hp 172 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb | 1,492 kg 3,289 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 886 km 551 mi | 574 km 357 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 241 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 442 L 15.6 cu ft | 417 L 14.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI | Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.5 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK | 10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.83 LC100 km | 17.68 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi | 28.45 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal | 1,515 L400 US gal333 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,074 LC/year | 2,651 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI
- Is 2 kg lighter
- Uses 2.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 312 km (194 mi) more estimated range
- Has 25 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.5 T5
- Has 30 hp more
- Has 40 Nm more
- Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























