Car comparison

Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSIvsHonda Accord VIII · Facelift 2011 2.4 i-VTEC

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Seat Exeo ST

2.0 TSI

200 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedWagon / estate2009-2011
VS

Honda Accord VIII · Facelift 2011

2.4 i-VTEC

201 hp2354 ccGasolineFWDManualNaturally aspiratedWagon / estate2011-2012

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    235 km/h
    146 mph
  • Highest torque
    280 Nm
    207 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,490 kg
    3,285 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    134 hp/t
    100 kW/t
    7.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.9 L/100 km
    29.8 mpg US
    35.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    11.1 L/100 km
    21.2 mpg US
    25.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.0 L/100 km
    39.2 mpg US
    47.1 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    886 km
    551 mi
  • Largest trunk
    442 L
  • Best overall score
    60/100
  • Best performance score
    50/100
  • Best economy score
    86/100
  • Best practicality score
    82/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSeatExeo ST2.0 TSIHondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC
Power
200hp149kW
201hp150kW
Torque
280Nm207lb-ft
234Nm173lb-ft
Curb weight
1,490kg3,285lb
1,636kg3,607lb
Gross weight
2,050kg4,519lb
-
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
222 km/h
138 mph
To 99% top speed
73.4s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
77.5s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.6s
8.3s
0-200 km/h
28.5s
Calculated
36.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.2s
Calculated
7.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK
8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK
11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.4s
Calculated
16.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb
Calculated
123hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
188Nm/t126lb-ft/ton
Calculated
143Nm/t96lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
886km551mi
Calculated
747km464mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
2,354cc144cu in
Length
4,670mm184in
4,750mm187in
Width
1,772mm70in
1,840mm72in
Height
1,430mm56in
1,470mm58in
Wheelbase
2,642mm104in
2,705mm106in
Front track
1,522mm60in
-
Rear track
1,523mm60in
-
Trunk volume
442L
406L
Max trunk volume
1,354L
1,183L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
70L
65L
CO2 emissions-
201g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSIHonda Accord VIII Facelift 2011 2.4 i-VTECPowerTorque
  • Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Honda Accord VIII Facelift 2011 2.4 i-VTEC: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI5,700 rpm3,500 rpm5,950 rpm
HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC7,000 rpm4,300-4,400 rpm7,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSeatExeo ST2.0 TSIHondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.2 s
7.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.6 s
8.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
28.5 s
36.5 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
222 km/h
138 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
7.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.3 s
10.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.1 s
13.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.4 s
16.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
155 km/h
96 mph
147 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI
200 hp
149 kW
HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC
201 hp
150 kW

Honda Accord VIII Facelift 2011 2.4 i-VTEC has 1 hp more than Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI and Honda Accord VIII Facelift 2011 2.4 i-VTEC: 1 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC
234 Nm
173 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI
1,490 kg
3,285 lb
HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC
1,636 kg
3,607 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI
235 km/h
146 mph
HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC
222 km/h
138 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI7.6 s
HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC8.3 s

Although Honda Accord VIII Facelift 2011 2.4 i-VTEC has more power, Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI and Honda Accord VIII Facelift 2011 2.4 i-VTEC: 0.7 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI and Honda Accord VIII Facelift 2011 2.4 i-VTEC: 0.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI
134 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC
123 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI
886 km
551 mi
HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC
747 km
464 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI
200 hp
149 kW
7.6 s
235 km/h
146 mph
HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC
201 hp
150 kW
8.3 s
222 km/h
138 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
442 L
15.6 cu ft
Length
4,670 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,430 mm
56.3 in
HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC
Power
201 hp
150 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
406 L
14.3 cu ft
Length
4,750 mm
187.0 in
Height
1,470 mm
57.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC
Power
201 hp
150 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK

Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
7.6 s
HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK
8.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI
134 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC
123 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSeatExeo ST2.0 TSIHondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC
Power
200 hp
149 kW
201 hp
150 kW
Torque
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
234 Nm
173 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.6 s
8.3 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
222 km/h
138 mph
Lightness
1,490 kg
3,285 lb
1,636 kg
3,607 lb
Fuel consumption
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
442 L
15.6 cu ft
Length
4,670 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,430 mm
56.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
406 L
14.3 cu ft
Length
4,750 mm
187.0 in
Height
1,470 mm
57.9 in
Range score
886 km
551 mi
747 km
464 mi
CO2 score
-
201 g/km
Trunk score
442 L
15.6 cu ft
406 L
14.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
134 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
123 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSeat Exeo ST 2.0 TSIHonda Accord VIII Facelift 2011 2.4 i-VTEC
Consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK8.7 L/100 km27 mpg US32.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.83 LC100 km15.22 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.25 LC100 mi24.50 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal1,305 L345 US gal287 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,074 LC/year2,284 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI

  • Has 46 Nm more
  • Is 146 kg lighter
  • Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 139 km (86 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 36 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI
Honda Accord VIII 2.4 i-VTEC
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SeatExeo ST2.0 TSIvsSeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
2.4 i-VTEC
2.2 i-DTEC Type S
VS
HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTECvsHondaAccord VIII2.2 i-DTEC Type S
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SeatExeo ST2.0 TSIvsSeatExeo2.0 TSI
2.4 i-VTEC
2.4 i-VTEC 16V
VS
HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTECvsHondaAccord VII2.4 i-VTEC 16V
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SeatExeo ST2.0 TSIvsSeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
SeatExeo ST2.0 TSIvsSeatLeon III ST2.0 TDI
2.4 i-VTEC
2.0 TSI
VS
HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTECvsVolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B7)2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
SeatExeo ST2.0 TSIvsSeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI
2.4 i-VTEC
2.0 TSI
VS
HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTECvsSeatExeo ST2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
1.8 TSI
VS
SeatExeo ST2.0 TSIvsSeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI
2.4 i-VTEC
GT 2.0 TCe
VS
HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTECvsRenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe
2.0 TSI
2.0 T
VS
SeatExeo ST2.0 TSIvsCadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI vs Honda Accord VIII · Facelift 2011 2.4 i-VTEC - car comparison - FastVsFaster