Seat Exeo · Facelift 2011
Car comparison
Seat Exeo · Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI · Stage 3vsSeat Exeo · Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI · Stage 2vsSeat Exeo · Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI · Stage 1vsSeat Exeo · Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSeat Exeo · Facelift 2011
2.0 TSI (Stage 2)
Seat Exeo · Facelift 2011
2.0 TSI (Stage 1)
Seat Exeo · Facelift 2011
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI (Stage 3) 300 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.7 s
- Fastest top speed285 km/h177 mph Unrestricted275 km/h171 mph Restricted
- Most powerful300 hp224 kW
- Highest torque434 Nm320 lb-ft
- Lightest1,455 kg3,208 lb
- Best power-to-weight206 hp/t154 kW/t4.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions179 g/km
- Best estimated range909 km565 mi
- Largest trunk460 L
- Best overall score71/100
- Best performance score69/100
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI (Stage 3)300 hp | SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI (Stage 2)260 hp | SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI (Stage 1)236 hp | SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI200 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300hp224kW+100 hp | 260hp194kW+60 hp | 236hp176kW+36 hp | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 434Nm320lb-ft+154 Nm | 378Nm279lb-ft+98 Nm | 342Nm252lb-ft+62 Nm | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,455kg3,208lb | 1,455kg3,208lb | 1,455kg3,208lb | 1,455kg3,208lb |
| Gross weight | 2,015kg4,442lb | 2,015kg4,442lb | 2,015kg4,442lb | 2,015kg4,442lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph Calculated | 264 km/h 164 mph | 256 km/h 159 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 58.8s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph-6.2 s Calculated | 60.8s99% target: 261 km/h / 162 mph-4.2 s Calculated | 63.5s99% target: 253 km/h / 157 mph-1.5 s Calculated | 65.0s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.7s-1.6 s | 6.2s-1.1 s | 6.6s-0.7 s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.7s-10.4 s Calculated | 18.6s-7.5 s Calculated | 20.6s-5.5 s Calculated | 26.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.4s-1.5 s Calculated | 5.9s-1.0 s Calculated | 6.3s-0.7 s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.5s-1.7 s Calculated | 14.1s-1.1 s Calculated | 14.5s-0.7 s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 206hp/t154kW/t94hp/1000 lb Calculated | 179hp/t133kW/t81hp/1000 lb Calculated | 162hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated | 137hp/t103kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 298Nm/t200lb-ft/ton Calculated | 260Nm/t174lb-ft/ton Calculated | 235Nm/t157lb-ft/ton Calculated | 192Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 909km565mi Calculated | 909km565mi Calculated | 909km565mi Calculated | 909km565mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,661mm184in | 4,661mm184in | 4,661mm184in | 4,661mm184in |
| Width | 1,772mm70in | 1,772mm70in | 1,772mm70in | 1,772mm70in |
| Height | 1,430mm56in | 1,430mm56in | 1,430mm56in | 1,430mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,642mm104in | 2,642mm104in | 2,642mm104in | 2,642mm104in |
| Front track | 1,522mm60in | 1,522mm60in | 1,522mm60in | 1,522mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,523mm60in | 1,523mm60in | 1,523mm60in | 1,523mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 460L | 460L | 460L | 460L |
| Max trunk volume | 833L | 833L | 833L | 833L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 70L | 70L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 179g/km | 179g/km | 179g/km | 179g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI (Stage 3) 300 hp: Power / Torque
- Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI (Stage 2) 260 hp: Power / Torque
- Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI (Stage 1) 236 hp: Power / Torque
- Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI 200 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI (Stage 3)300 hp | 5,100 rpm | 1,800 rpm | 5,350 rpm |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI (Stage 2)260 hp | 5,100 rpm | 1,800 rpm | 5,350 rpm |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI (Stage 1)236 hp | 5,100 rpm | 1,800 rpm | 5,350 rpm |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI200 hp | 5,100 rpm | 1,800 rpm | 5,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI (Stage 3)300 hp | SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI (Stage 2)260 hp | SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI (Stage 1)236 hp | SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI200 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.4 s | 5.9 s | 6.3 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.7 s | 6.2 s | 6.6 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.7 s | 18.6 s | 20.6 s | 26.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph Likely limited | 264 km/h 164 mph | 256 km/h 159 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.5 s | 6.6 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 9.5 s | 9.7 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.5 s | 12.0 s | 12.3 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.5 s | 14.1 s | 14.5 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 184 km/h 115 mph | 174 km/h 108 mph | 169 km/h 105 mph | 159 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI (Stage 3)300 hp | 300 hp 224 kW |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI (Stage 2)260 hp | 260 hp 194 kW |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI (Stage 1)236 hp | 236 hp 176 kW |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI200 hp | 200 hp 149 kW |
Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI (Stage 3) 300 hp has 100 hp more than Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI 200 hp.
The biggest power difference is between Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI 200 hp and Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI (Stage 3) 300 hp: 100 hp (75 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI (Stage 3)300 hp | 434 Nm 320 lb-ft |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI (Stage 2)260 hp | 378 Nm 279 lb-ft |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI (Stage 1)236 hp | 342 Nm 252 lb-ft |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI200 hp | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI (Stage 3)300 hp | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI (Stage 2)260 hp | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI (Stage 1)236 hp | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI200 hp | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI (Stage 3)300 hp | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI (Stage 2)260 hp | 264 km/h 164 mph |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI (Stage 1)236 hp | 256 km/h 159 mph |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI200 hp | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI (Stage 3)300 hp | 5.7 s |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI (Stage 2)260 hp | 6.2 s |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI (Stage 1)236 hp | 6.6 s |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI200 hp | 7.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI (Stage 3) 300 hp and Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI 200 hp: 1.6 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI (Stage 2) 260 hp and Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI (Stage 1) 236 hp, separated by only 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI (Stage 3)300 hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI (Stage 2)260 hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI (Stage 1)236 hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI200 hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI (Stage 3)300 hp | 206 hp/t 154 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI (Stage 2)260 hp | 179 hp/t 133 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI (Stage 1)236 hp | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI200 hp | 137 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI (Stage 3)300 hp | 909 km 565 mi |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI (Stage 2)260 hp | 909 km 565 mi |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI (Stage 1)236 hp | 909 km 565 mi |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI200 hp | 909 km 565 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI (Stage 3)300 hp | 300 hp 224 kW | 5.7 s | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI (Stage 2)260 hp | 260 hp 194 kW | 6.2 s | 264 km/h 164 mph |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI (Stage 1)236 hp | 236 hp 176 kW | 6.6 s | 256 km/h 159 mph |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI200 hp | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.3 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI (Stage 3)300 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI (Stage 2)260 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI (Stage 1)236 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI200 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI (Stage 3)300 hp |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI (Stage 2)260 hp |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI (Stage 1)236 hp |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI200 hp |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI (Stage 3) 300 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI (Stage 3)300 hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI (Stage 2)260 hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 6.2 s |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI (Stage 1)236 hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI200 hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI (Stage 3)300 hp | 206 hp/t 154 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI (Stage 2)260 hp | 179 hp/t 133 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI (Stage 1)236 hp | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI200 hp | 137 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI (Stage 3)300 hp | SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI (Stage 2)260 hp | SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI (Stage 1)236 hp | SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI200 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp 224 kW | 260 hp 194 kW | 236 hp 176 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 434 Nm 320 lb-ft | 378 Nm 279 lb-ft | 342 Nm 252 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.7 s | 6.2 s | 6.6 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph | 264 km/h 164 mph | 256 km/h 159 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 909 km 565 mi | 909 km 565 mi | 909 km 565 mi | 909 km 565 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 179 g/km | 179 g/km | 179 g/km | 179 g/km | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 206 hp/t 154 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | 179 hp/t 133 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 137 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI (Stage 3) 300 hp | Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI (Stage 2) 260 hp | Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI (Stage 1) 236 hp | Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI 200 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.48 LC100 km | 13.48 LC100 km | 13.48 LC100 km | 13.48 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,021 LC/year | 2,021 LC/year | 2,021 LC/year | 2,021 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI (Stage 3) 300 hp
- Has 40 hp more
- Has 56 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 21 km/h (13 mph) higher top speed
- Has 27 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest CO2 emissions
Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI (Stage 2) 260 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























