Seat Exeo · Facelift 2011
Car comparison
Seat Exeo · Facelift 2011 2.0 TSIvsHonda Accord VIII 2.4i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonHonda Accord VIII
2.4i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Highest torque280 Nm207 lb-ft
- Lightest1,455 kg3,208 lb
- Best power-to-weight137 hp/t103 kW/t7.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range909 km565 mi
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Honda Accord VIII 2.4i
- Most powerful201 hp150 kW
- Largest trunk464 L
Specification comparison
| Model | SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI | HondaAccord VIII2.4i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 201hp150kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 220Nm162lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,455kg3,208lb | 1,607kg3,543lb |
| Gross weight | 2,015kg4,442lb | 2,030kg4,475lb |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 65.0s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 70.2s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.1s Calculated | 31.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK | 11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 137hp/t103kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated | 125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 192Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated | 137Nm/t92lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 909km565mi Calculated | 739km459mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 2,354cc144cu in |
| Length | 4,661mm184in | 4,726mm186in |
| Width | 1,772mm70in | 1,840mm72in |
| Height | 1,430mm56in | 1,440mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,642mm104in | 2,705mm106in |
| Front track | 1,522mm60in | 1,580mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,523mm60in | 1,580mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 460L | 464L |
| Max trunk volume | 833L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 65L |
| CO2 emissions | 179g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Honda Accord VIII 2.4i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 5,100 rpm | 1,800 rpm | 5,350 rpm |
| HondaAccord VIII2.4i | 6,800 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI | HondaAccord VIII2.4i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.1 s | 31.1 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 159 km/h 99 mph | 152 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
| HondaAccord VIII2.4i | 201 hp 150 kW |
Honda Accord VIII 2.4i has 1 hp more than Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI and Honda Accord VIII 2.4i: 1 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| HondaAccord VIII2.4i | 220 Nm 162 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb |
| HondaAccord VIII2.4i | 1,607 kg 3,543 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| HondaAccord VIII2.4i | 227 km/h 141 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 7.3 s |
| HondaAccord VIII2.4i | 7.9 s |
Although Honda Accord VIII 2.4i has more power, Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI and Honda Accord VIII 2.4i: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| HondaAccord VIII2.4i | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI and Honda Accord VIII 2.4i: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 137 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
| HondaAccord VIII2.4i | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 909 km 565 mi |
| HondaAccord VIII2.4i | 739 km 459 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.3 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| HondaAccord VIII2.4i | 201 hp 150 kW | 7.9 s | 227 km/h 141 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| HondaAccord VIII2.4i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| HondaAccord VIII2.4i |
| 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
| HondaAccord VIII2.4i | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 137 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| HondaAccord VIII2.4i | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI | HondaAccord VIII2.4i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 201 hp 150 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 220 Nm 162 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb | 1,607 kg 3,543 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 909 km 565 mi | 739 km 459 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 179 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | 464 L 16.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 137 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI | Honda Accord VIII 2.4i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK | 8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.48 LC100 km | 15.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi | 24.78 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal | 1,320 L349 US gal290 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,021 LC/year | 2,310 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI
- Has 60 Nm more
- Is 152 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 170 km (106 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Honda Accord VIII 2.4i
- Has 1 hp more
- Has 4 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























