Car comparison

Seat Exeo · Facelift 2011 2.0 TSIvsVolvo S60 II 2.4 D5

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Seat Exeo · Facelift 2011

2.0 TSI

200 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2011-2012
VS

Volvo S60 II

2.4 D5

215 hp2400 ccDieselFWDManualTwin-turboSedan2011-2013

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5

  • Most powerful
    215 hp
    160 kW
  • Highest torque
    420 Nm
    310 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.7 L/100 km
    50.0 mpg US
    60.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.8 L/100 km
    40.6 mpg US
    48.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.1 L/100 km
    57.4 mpg US
    68.9 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,436 km
    892 mi
  • Best performance score
    54/100
  • Best economy score
    94/100

Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.3 s
  • Fastest top speed
    235 km/h
    146 mph
  • Lightest
    1,455 kg
    3,208 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    137 hp/t
    103 kW/t
    7.3 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    460 L
  • Best overall score
    59/100
  • Best practicality score
    74/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSIVolvoS60 II2.4 D5
Power
200hp149kW
215hp160kW
Torque
280Nm207lb-ft
420Nm310lb-ft
Curb weight
1,455kg3,208lb
1,583kg3,490lb
Gross weight
2,015kg4,442lb
2,090kg4,608lb
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
235 km/h
146 mph
To 99% top speed
65.0s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
68.4s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.3s
7.4s
0-200 km/h
26.1s
Calculated
27.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.0s
Calculated
7.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
4.1L/100 km57.4mpg US68.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.2s
Calculated
15.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
137hp/t103kW/t62hp/1000 lb
Calculated
136hp/t101kW/t62hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
192Nm/t129lb-ft/ton
Calculated
265Nm/t178lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
909km565mi
Calculated
1,436km892mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
2,400cc146cu in
Length
4,661mm184in
4,628mm182in
Width
1,772mm70in
1,865mm73in
Height
1,430mm56in
1,484mm58in
Wheelbase
2,642mm104in
2,776mm109in
Front track
1,522mm60in
1,588mm63in
Rear track
1,523mm60in
1,585mm62in
Ground clearance-
136mm5in
Trunk volume
460L
380L
Max trunk volume
833L
-
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
70L
68L
CO2 emissions
179g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSIVolvo S60 II 2.4 D5PowerTorque
  • Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI5,100 rpm1,800 rpm5,350 rpm
VolvoS60 II2.4 D54,000 rpm1,500-3,250 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSIVolvoS60 II2.4 D5
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.0 s
7.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.3 s
7.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
26.1 s
27.1 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
235 km/h
146 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.1 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.9 s
13.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.2 s
15.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
159 km/h
99 mph
157 km/h
98 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
200 hp
149 kW
VolvoS60 II2.4 D5
215 hp
160 kW

Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5 has 15 hp more than Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI and Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5: 15 hp (11 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
VolvoS60 II2.4 D5
420 Nm
310 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
1,455 kg
3,208 lb
VolvoS60 II2.4 D5
1,583 kg
3,490 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
235 km/h
146 mph
VolvoS60 II2.4 D5
235 km/h
146 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI7.3 s
VolvoS60 II2.4 D57.4 s

Although Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5 has more power, Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI and Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
VolvoS60 II2.4 D5
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5 and Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI: 3.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
137 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
VolvoS60 II2.4 D5
136 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
909 km
565 mi
VolvoS60 II2.4 D5
1,436 km
892 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
200 hp
149 kW
7.3 s
235 km/h
146 mph
VolvoS60 II2.4 D5
215 hp
160 kW
7.4 s
235 km/h
146 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
460 L
16.2 cu ft
Length
4,661 mm
183.5 in
Height
1,430 mm
56.3 in
VolvoS60 II2.4 D5
Power
215 hp
160 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,628 mm
182.2 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
VolvoS60 II2.4 D5
Power
215 hp
160 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK

Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
7.3 s
VolvoS60 II2.4 D5
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK
7.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
137 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
VolvoS60 II2.4 D5
136 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSIVolvoS60 II2.4 D5
Power
200 hp
149 kW
215 hp
160 kW
Torque
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
420 Nm
310 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.3 s
7.4 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
235 km/h
146 mph
Lightness
1,455 kg
3,208 lb
1,583 kg
3,490 lb
Fuel consumption
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
460 L
16.2 cu ft
Length
4,661 mm
183.5 in
Height
1,430 mm
56.3 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,628 mm
182.2 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in
Range score
909 km
565 mi
1,436 km
892 mi
CO2 score
179 g/km
-
Trunk score
460 L
16.2 cu ft
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
137 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
136 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSeat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSIVolvo S60 II 2.4 D5
Consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.48 LC100 km8.23 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.69 LC100 mi13.24 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal705 L186 US gal155 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,021 LC/year1,234 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI

  • Is 128 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 80 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5

  • Has 15 hp more
  • Has 140 Nm more
  • Uses 3.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 527 km (328 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI
Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsSeatExeo2.0 TSI
2.4 D5
2.4 D5
VS
VolvoS60 II2.4 D5vsVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsSeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
2.4 D5
2.4i T5 20V
VS
VolvoS60 II2.4 D5vsVolvoS602.4i T5 20V
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsSeatExeo ST2.0 TSI
2.4 D5
2.5 T5
VS
VolvoS60 II2.4 D5vsVolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsVolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI
2.4 D5
2.5
VS
VolvoS60 II2.4 D5vsVolvoS40 II2.5
2.0 TSI
2.4 i-VTEC
VS
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsHondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.4 i-VTEC
2.4 D5
2.5T 20V
VS
VolvoS60 II2.4 D5vsVolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V
2.0 TSI
2.4 D5
VS
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsVolvoS60 II2.4 D5
2.0 TSI
250 V6
VS
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsLexusIS II (XE20)Facelift 2010250 V6
Seat Exeo · Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI vs Volvo S60 II 2.4 D5 - car comparison - FastVsFaster