Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) · Facelift 2013 E 250 CDIvsSeat Exeo · Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) · Facelift 2013

E 250 CDI

204 hp2143 ccDieselRWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2013-2014
VS

Seat Exeo · Facelift 2011

2.0 TSI

200 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2011-2012

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 250 CDI

  • Fastest top speed
    242 km/h
    150 mph
  • Most powerful
    204 hp
    152 kW
  • Highest torque
    500 Nm
    369 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.1 L/100 km
    46.1 mpg US
    55.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.2 L/100 km
    37.9 mpg US
    45.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.5 L/100 km
    52.3 mpg US
    62.8 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,157 km
    719 mi
  • Largest trunk
    540 L
  • Best overall score
    63/100
  • Best performance score
    56/100
  • Best economy score
    93/100
  • Best practicality score
    77/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 CDISeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
Power
204hp152kW
200hp149kW
Torque
500Nm369lb-ft
280Nm207lb-ft
Curb weight
1,700kg3,748lb
1,455kg3,208lb
Gross weight
2,330kg5,137lb
2,015kg4,442lb
Top speed
242 km/h
150 mph
235 km/h
146 mph
To 99% top speed
72.5s99% target: 240 km/h / 149 mph
Calculated
65.0s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.5s
7.3s
0-200 km/h
26.2s
Calculated
26.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.2s
Calculated
7.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.3s
Calculated
15.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
120hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
137hp/t103kW/t62hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
294Nm/t197lb-ft/ton
Calculated
192Nm/t129lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,157km719mi
Calculated
909km565mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,143cc131cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,879mm192in
4,661mm184in
Width
1,854mm73in
1,772mm70in
Height
1,474mm58in
1,430mm56in
Wheelbase
2,874mm113in
2,642mm104in
Front track
1,598mm63in
1,522mm60in
Rear track
1,614mm64in
1,523mm60in
Trunk volume
540L
460L
Max trunk volume-
833L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
59L
70L
CO2 emissions-
179g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 250 CDISeat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSIPowerTorque
  • Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 250 CDI: Power / Torque
  • Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 CDI3,800 rpm1,600-1,800 rpm4,050 rpm
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI5,100 rpm1,800 rpm5,350 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 CDISeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.2 s
7.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.5 s
7.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
26.2 s
26.1 s
Top speed
242 km/h
150 mph
235 km/h
146 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
10.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.0 s
12.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.3 s
15.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
158 km/h
98 mph
159 km/h
99 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 CDI
204 hp
152 kW
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
200 hp
149 kW

Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 250 CDI has 4 hp more than Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 250 CDI: 4 hp (3 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 CDI
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
280 Nm
207 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 CDI
1,700 kg
3,748 lb
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
1,455 kg
3,208 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 CDI
242 km/h
150 mph
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
235 km/h
146 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 250 CDI has more power, Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 250 CDI: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 CDI
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 250 CDI and Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI: 2.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 CDI
120 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
137 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 CDI
1,157 km
719 mi
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
909 km
565 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 CDI
204 hp
152 kW
7.5 s
242 km/h
150 mph
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
200 hp
149 kW
7.3 s
235 km/h
146 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 CDI
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
242 km/h
150 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,879 mm
192.1 in
Height
1,474 mm
58.0 in
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
460 L
16.2 cu ft
Length
4,661 mm
183.5 in
Height
1,430 mm
56.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 CDI
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
242 km/h
150 mph
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK

Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 250 CDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 CDI
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
7.5 s
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
7.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 CDI
120 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
137 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 CDISeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
Power
204 hp
152 kW
200 hp
149 kW
Torque
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.5 s
7.3 s
Top speed
242 km/h
150 mph
235 km/h
146 mph
Lightness
1,700 kg
3,748 lb
1,455 kg
3,208 lb
Fuel consumption
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,879 mm
192.1 in
Height
1,474 mm
58.0 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
460 L
16.2 cu ft
Length
4,661 mm
183.5 in
Height
1,430 mm
56.3 in
Range score
1,157 km
719 mi
909 km
565 mi
CO2 score
-
179 g/km
Trunk score
540 L
19.1 cu ft
460 L
16.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
120 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
137 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 250 CDISeat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI
Consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km8.92 LC100 km13.48 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi14.36 LC100 mi21.69 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used765 L202 US gal168 UK gal1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,339 LC/year2,021 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 250 CDI

  • Has 4 hp more
  • Has 220 Nm more
  • Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 2.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 248 km (154 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 80 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest

Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI

  • Is 245 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) E 250 CDI
Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) · Facelift 2013 E 250 CDI vs Seat Exeo · Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster