Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) · Facelift 2013
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) · Facelift 2013 E 250 CDIvsSeat Exeo · Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSeat Exeo · Facelift 2011
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 250 CDI
- Fastest top speed242 km/h150 mph
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,157 km719 mi
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score56/100
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Lightest1,455 kg3,208 lb
- Best power-to-weight137 hp/t103 kW/t7.3 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 CDI | SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,700kg3,748lb | 1,455kg3,208lb |
| Gross weight | 2,330kg5,137lb | 2,015kg4,442lb |
| Top speed | 242 km/h 150 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 72.5s99% target: 240 km/h / 149 mph Calculated | 65.0s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.2s Calculated | 26.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 120hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated | 137hp/t103kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 294Nm/t197lb-ft/ton Calculated | 192Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,157km719mi Calculated | 909km565mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,143cc131cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,879mm192in | 4,661mm184in |
| Width | 1,854mm73in | 1,772mm70in |
| Height | 1,474mm58in | 1,430mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,874mm113in | 2,642mm104in |
| Front track | 1,598mm63in | 1,522mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,614mm64in | 1,523mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 540L | 460L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 833L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 59L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 179g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 250 CDI: Power / Torque
- Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 CDI | 3,800 rpm | 1,600-1,800 rpm | 4,050 rpm |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 5,100 rpm | 1,800 rpm | 5,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 CDI | SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.2 s | 26.1 s |
| Top speed | 242 km/h 150 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 159 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 CDI | 204 hp 152 kW |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 250 CDI has 4 hp more than Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 250 CDI: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 CDI | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 CDI | 1,700 kg 3,748 lb |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 CDI | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 CDI | 7.5 s |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 7.3 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 250 CDI has more power, Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 250 CDI: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 CDI | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 250 CDI and Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI: 2.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 CDI | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 137 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 CDI | 1,157 km 719 mi |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 909 km 565 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 CDI | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.5 s | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.3 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 CDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 CDI |
| 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 250 CDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 CDI | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 CDI | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 137 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 CDI | SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 242 km/h 150 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,700 kg 3,748 lb | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,157 km 719 mi | 909 km 565 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 179 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 137 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 250 CDI | Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.92 LC100 km | 13.48 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.36 LC100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 765 L202 US gal168 UK gal | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,339 LC/year | 2,021 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 250 CDI
- Has 4 hp more
- Has 220 Nm more
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 248 km (154 mi) more estimated range
- Has 80 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI
- Is 245 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























