Mercedes-Benz E-class (W214)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W214) E 200vsMercedes-Benz E-class (W212) · Facelift 2013 E 250 CDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz E-class (W212) · Facelift 2013
E 250 CDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 250 CDI
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lightest1,700 kg3,748 lb
- Best power-to-weight120 hp/t89 kW/t8.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,157 km719 mi
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score56/100
- Best economy score93/100
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W214) E 200
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.5 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best practicality score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200 | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 CDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 204hp152kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 500Nm369lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,825kg4,023lb | 1,700kg3,748lb |
| Gross weight | 2,450kg5,401lb | 2,330kg5,137lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 74.9s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 72.5s99% target: 240 km/h / 149 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 24.9s Calculated | 26.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 112hp/t83kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated | 120hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 175Nm/t117lb-ft/ton Calculated | 294Nm/t197lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 904km562mi Calculated | 1,157km719mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in | 2,143cc131cu in |
| Length | 4,949mm195in | 4,879mm192in |
| Width | 1,880mm74in | 1,854mm73in |
| Height | 1,468mm58in | 1,474mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,961mm117in | 2,874mm113in |
| Front track | 1,634mm64in | 1,598mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,648mm65in | 1,614mm64in |
| Trunk volume | 540L | 540L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 59L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz E-class (W214) E 200: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 250 CDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200 | 5,800 rpm | 1,600-4,000 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 CDI | 3,800 rpm | 1,600-1,800 rpm | 4,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200 | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 CDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 24.9 s | 26.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 159 km/h 99 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200 | 204 hp 152 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 CDI | 204 hp 152 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 CDI | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200 | 1,825 kg 4,023 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 CDI | 1,700 kg 3,748 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200 | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 CDI | 242 km/h 150 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200 | 7.5 s |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 CDI | 7.5 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200 | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 CDI | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 250 CDI and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W214) E 200: 2.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200 | 112 hp/t 83 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 CDI | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200 | 904 km 562 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 CDI | 1,157 km 719 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200 | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.5 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 CDI | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.5 s | 242 km/h 150 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 CDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200 |
| 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 CDI |
| 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 250 CDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200 | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 CDI | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200 | 112 hp/t 83 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 CDI | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 200 | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 250 CDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 204 hp 152 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | 242 km/h 150 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,825 kg 4,023 lb | 1,700 kg 3,748 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 904 km 562 mi | 1,157 km 719 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 112 hp/t 83 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz E-class (W214) E 200 | Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 250 CDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.78 LC100 km | 8.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.56 LC100 mi | 14.36 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal | 765 L202 US gal168 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,916 LC/year | 1,339 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W214) E 200
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 250 CDI
- Has 180 Nm more
- Is 125 kg lighter
- Uses 2.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 253 km (157 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























