Seat Exeo
Car comparison
Seat Exeo 2.0 TSIvsSeat Exeo · Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSeat Exeo · Facelift 2011
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI Manual
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Fastest top speed244 km/h152 mph
- Most powerful211 hp157 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight140 hp/t105 kW/t7.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,014 km630 mi
- Largest trunk460 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best economy score88/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI Automatic
- Lightest1,455 kg3,208 lb
Specification comparison
| Model | SeatExeo2.0 TSIManual | SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSIAutomatic |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 211hp157kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,505kg3,318lb | 1,455kg3,208lb |
| Gross weight | 1,990kg4,387lb | 2,015kg4,442lb |
| Top speed | 244 km/h 152 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 66.6s99% target: 242 km/h / 150 mph Calculated | 65.0s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.1s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 24.0s Calculated | 26.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.0s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 140hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated | 137hp/t103kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 213Nm/t142lb-ft/ton Calculated | 192Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,014km630mi Calculated | 909km565mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,661mm184in | 4,661mm184in |
| Width | 1,772mm70in | 1,772mm70in |
| Height | 1,430mm56in | 1,430mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,642mm104in | 2,642mm104in |
| Front track | 1,522mm60in | 1,522mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,523mm60in | 1,523mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 460L | 460L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 833L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 179g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI Manual: Power / Torque
- Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI Automatic: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSIManual | 4,600-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,600 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSIAutomatic | 5,100 rpm | 1,800 rpm | 5,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SeatExeo2.0 TSIManual | SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSIAutomatic |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.1 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 24.0 s | 26.1 s |
| Top speed | 244 km/h 152 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.0 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 162 km/h 100 mph | 159 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSIManual | 211 hp 157 kW |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSIAutomatic | 200 hp 149 kW |
Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI Manual has 11 hp more than Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI Automatic.
The biggest power difference is between Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI Automatic and Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI Manual: 11 hp (8 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSIManual | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSIAutomatic | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSIManual | 1,505 kg 3,318 lb |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSIAutomatic | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSIManual | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSIAutomatic | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSIManual | 7.1 s |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSIAutomatic | 7.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI Manual and Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI Automatic: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSIManual | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSIAutomatic | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI Manual and Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI Automatic: 0.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSIManual | 140 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSIAutomatic | 137 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSIManual | 1,014 km 630 mi |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSIAutomatic | 909 km 565 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSIManual | 211 hp 157 kW | 7.1 s | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSIAutomatic | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.3 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSIManual |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSIAutomatic |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSIManual |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSIAutomatic |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI Manual is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSIManual | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSIAutomatic | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSIManual | 140 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSIAutomatic | 137 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SeatExeo2.0 TSIManual | SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSIAutomatic | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 211 hp 157 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.1 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 244 km/h 152 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,505 kg 3,318 lb | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,014 km 630 mi | 909 km 565 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 179 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 140 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 137 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI Manual | Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI Automatic |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.08 LC100 km | 13.48 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,811 LC/year | 2,021 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI Manual
- Has 11 hp more
- Has 40 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 105 km (65 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI Automatic
- Is 50 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























