Seat Exeo
Car comparison
Seat Exeo 2.0 TSIvsSeat Exeo · Facelift 2011 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSeat Exeo · Facelift 2011
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Fastest top speed241 km/h150 mph
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Lightest1,430 kg3,153 lb
- Best power-to-weight140 hp/t104 kW/t7.2 kg/hp
- Largest trunk460 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TDI
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,296 km805 mi
- Best economy score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SeatExeo2.0 TSI | SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 170hp127kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,430kg3,153lb | 1,455kg3,208lb |
| Gross weight | 1,990kg4,387lb | 2,015kg4,442lb |
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 67.1s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 74.3s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 8.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.1s Calculated | 32.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 8.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 140hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated | 117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated | 241Nm/t161lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 909km565mi Calculated | 1,296km805mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,661mm184in | 4,661mm184in |
| Width | 1,772mm70in | 1,772mm70in |
| Height | 1,430mm56in | 1,430mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,642mm104in | 2,642mm104in |
| Front track | 1,522mm60in | 1,522mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,523mm60in | 1,523mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 460L | 460L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 833L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 142g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 5,700 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 5,950 rpm |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 4,200 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SeatExeo2.0 TSI | SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 8.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 8.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.1 s | 32.1 s |
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 16.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 160 km/h 99 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 170 hp 127 kW |
Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI has 30 hp more than Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TDI and Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI: 30 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 229 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 7.3 s |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 8.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI and Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TDI: 1.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TDI and Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI: 2.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 909 km 565 mi |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 1,296 km 805 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.3 s | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 170 hp 127 kW | 8.4 s | 229 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI |
| 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SeatExeo2.0 TSI | SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 170 hp 127 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 8.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 909 km 565 mi | 1,296 km 805 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 142 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI | Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK | 5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.48 LC100 km | 9.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi | 15.21 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal | 810 L214 US gal178 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,021 LC/year | 1,418 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI
- Has 30 hp more
- Is 25 kg lighter
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 23 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TDI
- Has 70 Nm more
- Uses 2.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 387 km (241 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























