Seat Altea Freetrack
Car comparison
Seat Altea Freetrack 2.0 FSIvsVolkswagen Tiguan I · Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Tiguan I · Facelift 2011
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Tiguan I Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Most powerful211 hp157 kW
- Best power-to-weight131 hp/t97 kW/t7.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range744 km462 mi
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score84/100
Seat Altea Freetrack 2.0 FSI
- Fastest top speed214 km/h133 mph
- Highest torque280 Nm207 lb-ft
- Lightest1,571 kg3,463 lb
- Largest trunk490 L
- Best practicality score83/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI | VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 211hp157kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,571kg3,463lb | 1,614kg3,558lb |
| Gross weight | 2,191kg4,830lb | 2,230kg4,916lb |
| Top speed | 214 km/h 133 mph | 213 km/h 132 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 78.4s99% target: 212 km/h / 132 mph Calculated | 69.4s99% target: 211 km/h / 131 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 42.3s Calculated | 39.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.8L/100 km18.4mpg US22.1mpg UK | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 127hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated | 131hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 178Nm/t119lb-ft/ton Calculated | 173Nm/t116lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 638km397mi Calculated | 744km462mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,493mm177in | 4,426mm174in |
| Width | 1,788mm70in | 1,809mm71in |
| Height | 1,622mm64in | 1,703mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,576mm101in | 2,604mm103in |
| Front track | 1,542mm61in | 1,569mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,527mm60in | 1,571mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 200mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 490L | 470L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,510L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 64L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Seat Altea Freetrack 2.0 FSI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Tiguan I Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI | 5,700 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 5,950 rpm |
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 5,300-6,200 rpm | 1,700-5,200 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI | VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.1 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 42.3 s | 39.4 s |
| Top speed | 214 km/h 133 mph | 213 km/h 132 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 147 km/h 91 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 211 hp 157 kW |
Volkswagen Tiguan I Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI has 11 hp more than Seat Altea Freetrack 2.0 FSI.
The biggest power difference is between Seat Altea Freetrack 2.0 FSI and Volkswagen Tiguan I Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI: 11 hp (8 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI | 1,571 kg 3,463 lb |
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 1,614 kg 3,558 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI | 214 km/h 133 mph |
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 213 km/h 132 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI | 7.5 s |
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 7.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan I Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI and Seat Altea Freetrack 2.0 FSI: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan I Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI and Seat Altea Freetrack 2.0 FSI: 0.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 131 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI | 638 km 397 mi |
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 744 km 462 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.5 s | 214 km/h 133 mph |
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 211 hp 157 kW | 7.3 s | 213 km/h 132 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI |
| 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Tiguan I Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 131 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI | VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 211 hp 157 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 214 km/h 133 mph | 213 km/h 132 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,571 kg 3,463 lb | 1,614 kg 3,558 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 638 km 397 mi | 744 km 462 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 490 L 17.3 cu ft | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 131 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Seat Altea Freetrack 2.0 FSI | Volkswagen Tiguan I Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK | 8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.45 LC100 km | 15.05 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi | 24.22 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal | 1,290 L341 US gal284 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,468 LC/year | 2,258 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Seat Altea Freetrack 2.0 FSI
- Is 43 kg lighter
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 20 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Volkswagen Tiguan I Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI
- Has 11 hp more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 106 km (66 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























