Car comparison

RUF RtR 3.8 · Stage 3vsRUF RtR 3.8 · Stage 2vsRUF RtR 3.8 · Stage 1vsRUF RtR 3.8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

RUF RtR

3.8 (Stage 3)

1203 hp3746 ccGasolineRWDManualTwin-turboCoupe2013-present
VS

RUF RtR

3.8 (Stage 2)

1043 hp3746 ccGasolineRWDManualTwin-turboCoupe2013-present
VS

RUF RtR

3.8 (Stage 1)

946 hp3746 ccGasolineRWDManualTwin-turboCoupe2013-present
VS

RUF RtR

3.8

802 hp3746 ccGasolineRWDManualTwin-turboCoupe2013-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

RUF RtR 3.8 (Stage 3) 1203 hp

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    2.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    409 km/h
    254 mph
  • Most powerful
    1,203 hp
    897 kW
  • Highest torque
    1,535 Nm
    1,132 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,490 kg
    3,285 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    807 hp/t
    602 kW/t
    1.2 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    13.5 L/100 km
    17.4 mpg US
    20.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    20.2 L/100 km
    11.6 mpg US
    14.0 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    9.9 L/100 km
    23.8 mpg US
    28.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    320 g/km
  • Best overall score
    82/100
  • Best performance score
    96/100
  • Best economy score
    71/100
  • Best practicality score
    51/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelRUFRtR3.8 (Stage 3)1203 hpRUFRtR3.8 (Stage 2)1043 hpRUFRtR3.8 (Stage 1)946 hpRUFRtR3.8802 hp
Power
1,203hp897kW+401 hp
1,043hp777kW+241 hp
946hp706kW+144 hp
802hp598kW
Torque
1,535Nm1,132lb-ft+545 Nm
1,337Nm986lb-ft+347 Nm
1,208Nm891lb-ft+218 Nm
990Nm730lb-ft
Curb weight
1,490kg3,285lb
1,490kg3,285lb
1,490kg3,285lb
1,490kg3,285lb
Top speed
409 km/h
254 mph
+59 km/h
393 km/h
244 mph
+43 km/h
382 km/h
237 mph
+32 km/h
350 km/h
217 mph
To 99% top speed
40.8s99% target: 405 km/h / 252 mph-2.8 s
Calculated
42.5s99% target: 389 km/h / 242 mph-1.1 s
Calculated
43.7s99% target: 378 km/h / 235 mph+0.1 s
Calculated
43.6s99% target: 347 km/h / 215 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
2.4s-0.7 s
2.6s-0.5 s
2.8s-0.3 s
3.1s
0-200 km/h
5.8s-2.1 s
Calculated
6.4s-1.5 s
Calculated
6.9s-1.0 s
Calculated
7.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
2.3s-0.7 s
Calculated
2.5s-0.4 s
Calculated
2.7s-0.3 s
Calculated
3.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
13.5L/100 km17.4mpg US20.9mpg UK
13.5L/100 km17.4mpg US20.9mpg UK
13.5L/100 km17.4mpg US20.9mpg UK
13.5L/100 km17.4mpg US20.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
20.2L/100 km11.6mpg US14.0mpg UK
20.2L/100 km11.6mpg US14.0mpg UK
20.2L/100 km11.6mpg US14.0mpg UK
20.2L/100 km11.6mpg US14.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK
9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK
9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK
9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
9.2s-1.2 s
Calculated
9.6s-0.8 s
Calculated
9.9s-0.5 s
Calculated
10.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
807hp/t602kW/t366hp/1000 lb
Calculated
700hp/t522kW/t317hp/1000 lb
Calculated
635hp/t474kW/t288hp/1000 lb
Calculated
538hp/t401kW/t244hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
1,030Nm/t689lb-ft/ton
Calculated
897Nm/t600lb-ft/ton
Calculated
811Nm/t542lb-ft/ton
Calculated
664Nm/t445lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Displacement
3,746cc229cu in
3,746cc229cu in
3,746cc229cu in
3,746cc229cu in
Length
4,491mm177in
4,491mm177in
4,491mm177in
4,491mm177in
Width
2,012mm79in
2,012mm79in
2,012mm79in
2,012mm79in
Height
1,295mm51in
1,295mm51in
1,295mm51in
1,295mm51in
Wheelbase
2,450mm96in
2,450mm96in
2,450mm96in
2,450mm96in
Doors
2
2
2
2
Seats
4
4
4
4
CO2 emissions
320g/km
320g/km
320g/km
320g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

RUF RtR 3.8 (Stage 3) 1203 hpRUF RtR 3.8 (Stage 2) 1043 hpRUF RtR 3.8 (Stage 1) 946 hpRUF RtR 3.8 802 hpPowerTorque
  • RUF RtR 3.8 (Stage 3) 1203 hp: Power / Torque
  • RUF RtR 3.8 (Stage 2) 1043 hp: Power / Torque
  • RUF RtR 3.8 (Stage 1) 946 hp: Power / Torque
  • RUF RtR 3.8 802 hp: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
RUFRtR3.8 (Stage 3)1203 hp7,300 rpm4,500 rpm7,550 rpm
RUFRtR3.8 (Stage 2)1043 hp7,300 rpm4,500 rpm7,550 rpm
RUFRtR3.8 (Stage 1)946 hp7,300 rpm4,500 rpm7,550 rpm
RUFRtR3.8802 hp7,300 rpm4,500 rpm7,550 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricRUFRtR3.8 (Stage 3)1203 hpRUFRtR3.8 (Stage 2)1043 hpRUFRtR3.8 (Stage 1)946 hpRUFRtR3.8802 hp
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
2.3 s
2.5 s
2.7 s
3.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
2.4 s
2.6 s
2.8 s
3.1 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
5.8 s
6.4 s
6.9 s
7.9 s
0-200 mph
0-322 km/h
13.5 s
15.6 s
17.4 s
23.7 s
Top speed
409 km/h
254 mph
393 km/h
244 mph
382 km/h
237 mph
350 km/h
217 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.7 s
1.8 s
1.8 s
1.9 s
330 ft
101 m
4.2 s
4.4 s
4.5 s
4.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
6.2 s
6.4 s
6.6 s
7.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
7.8 s
8.2 s
8.4 s
8.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
9.2 s
9.6 s
9.9 s
10.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
267 km/h
166 mph
256 km/h
159 mph
249 km/h
155 mph
235 km/h
146 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RUFRtR3.8 (Stage 3)1203 hp
1,203 hp
897 kW
RUFRtR3.8 (Stage 2)1043 hp
1,043 hp
777 kW
RUFRtR3.8 (Stage 1)946 hp
946 hp
706 kW
RUFRtR3.8802 hp
802 hp
598 kW

RUF RtR 3.8 (Stage 3) 1203 hp has 401 hp more than RUF RtR 3.8 802 hp.

The biggest power difference is between RUF RtR 3.8 802 hp and RUF RtR 3.8 (Stage 3) 1203 hp: 401 hp (299 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RUFRtR3.8 (Stage 3)1203 hp
1,535 Nm
1,132 lb-ft
RUFRtR3.8 (Stage 2)1043 hp
1,337 Nm
986 lb-ft
RUFRtR3.8 (Stage 1)946 hp
1,208 Nm
891 lb-ft
RUFRtR3.8802 hp
990 Nm
730 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RUFRtR3.8 (Stage 3)1203 hp
1,490 kg
3,285 lb
RUFRtR3.8 (Stage 2)1043 hp
1,490 kg
3,285 lb
RUFRtR3.8 (Stage 1)946 hp
1,490 kg
3,285 lb
RUFRtR3.8802 hp
1,490 kg
3,285 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RUFRtR3.8 (Stage 3)1203 hp
409 km/h
254 mph
RUFRtR3.8 (Stage 2)1043 hp
393 km/h
244 mph
RUFRtR3.8 (Stage 1)946 hp
382 km/h
237 mph
RUFRtR3.8802 hp
350 km/h
217 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RUFRtR3.8 (Stage 3)1203 hp2.4 s
RUFRtR3.8 (Stage 2)1043 hp2.6 s
RUFRtR3.8 (Stage 1)946 hp2.8 s
RUFRtR3.8802 hp3.1 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between RUF RtR 3.8 (Stage 3) 1203 hp and RUF RtR 3.8 802 hp: 0.7 s.

The closest cars by acceleration are RUF RtR 3.8 (Stage 2) 1043 hp and RUF RtR 3.8 (Stage 1) 946 hp, separated by only 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RUFRtR3.8 (Stage 3)1203 hp
13.5 L/100 km
17.4 mpg US
20.9 mpg UK
RUFRtR3.8 (Stage 2)1043 hp
13.5 L/100 km
17.4 mpg US
20.9 mpg UK
RUFRtR3.8 (Stage 1)946 hp
13.5 L/100 km
17.4 mpg US
20.9 mpg UK
RUFRtR3.8802 hp
13.5 L/100 km
17.4 mpg US
20.9 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RUFRtR3.8 (Stage 3)1203 hp
807 hp/t
602 kW/t
1.2 kg/hp
RUFRtR3.8 (Stage 2)1043 hp
700 hp/t
522 kW/t
1.4 kg/hp
RUFRtR3.8 (Stage 1)946 hp
635 hp/t
474 kW/t
1.6 kg/hp
RUFRtR3.8802 hp
538 hp/t
401 kW/t
1.9 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
RUFRtR3.8 (Stage 3)1203 hp
1,203 hp
897 kW
2.4 s
409 km/h
254 mph
RUFRtR3.8 (Stage 2)1043 hp
1,043 hp
777 kW
2.6 s
393 km/h
244 mph
RUFRtR3.8 (Stage 1)946 hp
946 hp
706 kW
2.8 s
382 km/h
237 mph
RUFRtR3.8802 hp
802 hp
598 kW
3.1 s
350 km/h
217 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
RUFRtR3.8 (Stage 3)1203 hp
Power
1,203 hp
897 kW
0-100 km/h2.4 s
Top speed
409 km/h
254 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,491 mm
176.8 in
Height
1,295 mm
51.0 in
RUFRtR3.8 (Stage 2)1043 hp
Power
1,043 hp
777 kW
0-100 km/h2.6 s
Top speed
393 km/h
244 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,491 mm
176.8 in
Height
1,295 mm
51.0 in
RUFRtR3.8 (Stage 1)946 hp
Power
946 hp
706 kW
0-100 km/h2.8 s
Top speed
382 km/h
237 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,491 mm
176.8 in
Height
1,295 mm
51.0 in
RUFRtR3.8802 hp
Power
802 hp
598 kW
0-100 km/h3.1 s
Top speed
350 km/h
217 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,491 mm
176.8 in
Height
1,295 mm
51.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
RUFRtR3.8 (Stage 3)1203 hp
Power
1,203 hp
897 kW
0-100 km/h2.4 s
Top speed
409 km/h
254 mph
13.5 L/100 km
17.4 mpg US
20.9 mpg UK
RUFRtR3.8 (Stage 2)1043 hp
Power
1,043 hp
777 kW
0-100 km/h2.6 s
Top speed
393 km/h
244 mph
13.5 L/100 km
17.4 mpg US
20.9 mpg UK
RUFRtR3.8 (Stage 1)946 hp
Power
946 hp
706 kW
0-100 km/h2.8 s
Top speed
382 km/h
237 mph
13.5 L/100 km
17.4 mpg US
20.9 mpg UK
RUFRtR3.8802 hp
Power
802 hp
598 kW
0-100 km/h3.1 s
Top speed
350 km/h
217 mph
13.5 L/100 km
17.4 mpg US
20.9 mpg UK

RUF RtR 3.8 (Stage 3) 1203 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
RUFRtR3.8 (Stage 3)1203 hp
13.5 L/100 km
17.4 mpg US
20.9 mpg UK
2.4 s
RUFRtR3.8 (Stage 2)1043 hp
13.5 L/100 km
17.4 mpg US
20.9 mpg UK
2.6 s
RUFRtR3.8 (Stage 1)946 hp
13.5 L/100 km
17.4 mpg US
20.9 mpg UK
2.8 s
RUFRtR3.8802 hp
13.5 L/100 km
17.4 mpg US
20.9 mpg UK
3.1 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
RUFRtR3.8 (Stage 3)1203 hp
807 hp/t
602 kW/t
1.2 kg/hp
13.5 L/100 km
17.4 mpg US
20.9 mpg UK
RUFRtR3.8 (Stage 2)1043 hp
700 hp/t
522 kW/t
1.4 kg/hp
13.5 L/100 km
17.4 mpg US
20.9 mpg UK
RUFRtR3.8 (Stage 1)946 hp
635 hp/t
474 kW/t
1.6 kg/hp
13.5 L/100 km
17.4 mpg US
20.9 mpg UK
RUFRtR3.8802 hp
538 hp/t
401 kW/t
1.9 kg/hp
13.5 L/100 km
17.4 mpg US
20.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleRUFRtR3.8 (Stage 3)1203 hpRUFRtR3.8 (Stage 2)1043 hpRUFRtR3.8 (Stage 1)946 hpRUFRtR3.8802 hp
Power
1,203 hp
897 kW
1,043 hp
777 kW
946 hp
706 kW
802 hp
598 kW
Torque
1,535 Nm
1,132 lb-ft
1,337 Nm
986 lb-ft
1,208 Nm
891 lb-ft
990 Nm
730 lb-ft
Acceleration
2.4 s
2.6 s
2.8 s
3.1 s
Top speed
409 km/h
254 mph
393 km/h
244 mph
382 km/h
237 mph
350 km/h
217 mph
Lightness
1,490 kg
3,285 lb
1,490 kg
3,285 lb
1,490 kg
3,285 lb
1,490 kg
3,285 lb
Fuel consumption
13.5 L/100 km
17.4 mpg US
20.9 mpg UK
13.5 L/100 km
17.4 mpg US
20.9 mpg UK
13.5 L/100 km
17.4 mpg US
20.9 mpg UK
13.5 L/100 km
17.4 mpg US
20.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,491 mm
176.8 in
Height
1,295 mm
51.0 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,491 mm
176.8 in
Height
1,295 mm
51.0 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,491 mm
176.8 in
Height
1,295 mm
51.0 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,491 mm
176.8 in
Height
1,295 mm
51.0 in
CO2 score
320 g/km
320 g/km
320 g/km
320 g/km
Power-to-weight score
807 hp/t
602 kW/t
1.2 kg/hp
700 hp/t
522 kW/t
1.4 kg/hp
635 hp/t
474 kW/t
1.6 kg/hp
538 hp/t
401 kW/t
1.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleRUF RtR 3.8 (Stage 3) 1203 hpRUF RtR 3.8 (Stage 2) 1043 hpRUF RtR 3.8 (Stage 1) 946 hpRUF RtR 3.8 802 hp
Consumption13.5 L/100 km17.4 mpg US20.9 mpg UK13.5 L/100 km17.4 mpg US20.9 mpg UK13.5 L/100 km17.4 mpg US20.9 mpg UK13.5 L/100 km17.4 mpg US20.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km23.63 LC100 km23.63 LC100 km23.63 LC100 km23.63 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi38.02 LC100 mi38.02 LC100 mi38.02 LC100 mi38.02 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used2,025 L535 US gal445 UK gal2,025 L535 US gal445 UK gal2,025 L535 US gal445 UK gal2,025 L535 US gal445 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,544 LC/year3,544 LC/year3,544 LC/year3,544 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

RUF RtR 3.8 (Stage 3) 1203 hp

  • Has 160 hp more
  • Has 198 Nm more
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 16 km/h (10 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 108 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
RUF RtR 3.8
Compare selected cars
1 vehicle selected

Popular comparisons

3.8
6.3 V12
VS
RUFRtR3.8vsFerrariLaFerrari6.3 V12
3.8
P1 V8
VS
RUFRtR3.8vsMcLarenP1P1 V8
3.8
6.3 V12
VS
RUFRtR3.8vsFerrariF12tdf6.3 V12
3.8
6.3 V12
VS
RUFRtR3.8vsFerrariF12 Berlinetta6.3 V12
3.8
6.5 V12
VS
RUFRtR3.8vsLamborghiniAventador LP 750-4 Superveloce6.5 V12
3.8
7.3 V12
VS
RUFRtR3.8vsAston MartinOne-777.3 V12
3.8
6.5 V12
VS
RUFRtR3.8vsLamborghiniAventador LP 700-4 Coupe6.5 V12
3.8
3.8 V8
VS
RUFRtR3.8vsMcLaren675LT Coupe3.8 V8
3.8
3.9 V8
VS
RUFRtR3.8vsFerrari488 Pista Spider3.9 V8
3.8
3.9 V8
VS
RUFRtR3.8vsFerrari488 Pista3.9 V8
3.8
6.5 V12
VS
RUFRtR3.8vsLamborghiniAventador Miura Homage6.5 V12
3.8
6.5 V12
VS
RUFRtR3.8vsFerrari812 Superfast6.5 V12
RUF RtR 3.8 · Stage 3 vs RUF RtR 3.8 · Stage 2 vs RUF RtR 3.8 · Stage 1 vs RUF RtR 3.8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster