Car comparison

RUF RtR 3.8vsMcLaren 675LT Coupe 3.8 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

RUF RtR

3.8

802 hp3746 ccGasolineRWDManualTwin-turboCoupe2013-present
VS

McLaren 675LT Coupe

3.8 V8

675 hp3799 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTwin-turboCoupe2015-2017

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

McLaren 675LT Coupe 3.8 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    2.9 s
  • Lightest
    1,328 kg
    2,928 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    11.7 L/100 km
    20.1 mpg US
    24.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    17.8 L/100 km
    13.2 mpg US
    15.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    8.2 L/100 km
    28.7 mpg US
    34.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    275 g/km
  • Best economy score
    75/100

RUF RtR 3.8

  • Fastest top speed
    350 km/h
    217 mph
  • Most powerful
    802 hp
    598 kW
  • Highest torque
    990 Nm
    730 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    538 hp/t
    401 kW/t
    1.9 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    81/100
  • Best performance score
    95/100
  • Best practicality score
    51/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelRUFRtR3.8McLaren675LT Coupe3.8 V8
Power
802hp598kW
675hp503kW
Torque
990Nm730lb-ft
700Nm516lb-ft
Curb weight
1,490kg3,285lb
1,328kg2,928lb
Top speed
350 km/h
217 mph
330 km/h
205 mph
To 99% top speed
43.6s99% target: 347 km/h / 215 mph
Calculated
42.8s99% target: 327 km/h / 203 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.1s
2.9s
0-200 km/h
7.9s
Calculated
7.9s
0-60 mph
3.0s
Calculated
2.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
13.5L/100 km17.4mpg US20.9mpg UK
11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
20.2L/100 km11.6mpg US14.0mpg UK
17.8L/100 km13.2mpg US15.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK
8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
10.4s
Calculated
10.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
538hp/t401kW/t244hp/1000 lb
Calculated
508hp/t379kW/t231hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
664Nm/t445lb-ft/ton
Calculated
527Nm/t353lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Displacement
3,746cc229cu in
3,799cc232cu in
Length
4,491mm177in
4,546mm179in
Width
2,012mm79in
2,095mm82in
Height
1,295mm51in
-
Wheelbase
2,450mm96in
-
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
2
CO2 emissions
320g/km
275g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

RUF RtR 3.8McLaren 675LT Coupe 3.8 V8PowerTorque
  • RUF RtR 3.8: Power / Torque
  • McLaren 675LT Coupe 3.8 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
RUFRtR3.87,300 rpm4,500 rpm7,550 rpm
McLaren675LT Coupe3.8 V87,100 rpm5,000-6,500 rpm7,350 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricRUFRtR3.8McLaren675LT Coupe3.8 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.0 s
2.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.1 s
2.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
7.9 s
7.9 s
0-200 mph
0-322 km/h
23.7 s
34.0 s
Top speed
350 km/h
217 mph
330 km/h
205 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.9 s
1.8 s
330 ft
101 m
4.7 s
4.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.0 s
6.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
8.8 s
8.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
10.4 s
10.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
235 km/h
146 mph
230 km/h
143 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RUFRtR3.8
802 hp
598 kW
McLaren675LT Coupe3.8 V8
675 hp
503 kW

RUF RtR 3.8 has 127 hp more than McLaren 675LT Coupe 3.8 V8.

The biggest power difference is between McLaren 675LT Coupe 3.8 V8 and RUF RtR 3.8: 127 hp (95 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RUFRtR3.8
990 Nm
730 lb-ft
McLaren675LT Coupe3.8 V8
700 Nm
516 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RUFRtR3.8
1,490 kg
3,285 lb
McLaren675LT Coupe3.8 V8
1,328 kg
2,928 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RUFRtR3.8
350 km/h
217 mph
McLaren675LT Coupe3.8 V8
330 km/h
205 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RUFRtR3.83.1 s
McLaren675LT Coupe3.8 V82.9 s

Although RUF RtR 3.8 has more power, McLaren 675LT Coupe 3.8 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between McLaren 675LT Coupe 3.8 V8 and RUF RtR 3.8: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RUFRtR3.8
13.5 L/100 km
17.4 mpg US
20.9 mpg UK
McLaren675LT Coupe3.8 V8
11.7 L/100 km
20.1 mpg US
24.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between McLaren 675LT Coupe 3.8 V8 and RUF RtR 3.8: 1.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RUFRtR3.8
538 hp/t
401 kW/t
1.9 kg/hp
McLaren675LT Coupe3.8 V8
508 hp/t
379 kW/t
2.0 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
RUFRtR3.8
802 hp
598 kW
3.1 s
350 km/h
217 mph
McLaren675LT Coupe3.8 V8
675 hp
503 kW
2.9 s
330 km/h
205 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
RUFRtR3.8
Power
802 hp
598 kW
0-100 km/h3.1 s
Top speed
350 km/h
217 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,491 mm
176.8 in
Height
1,295 mm
51.0 in
McLaren675LT Coupe3.8 V8
Power
675 hp
503 kW
0-100 km/h2.9 s
Top speed
330 km/h
205 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,546 mm
179.0 in
Height-

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
RUFRtR3.8
Power
802 hp
598 kW
0-100 km/h3.1 s
Top speed
350 km/h
217 mph
13.5 L/100 km
17.4 mpg US
20.9 mpg UK
McLaren675LT Coupe3.8 V8
Power
675 hp
503 kW
0-100 km/h2.9 s
Top speed
330 km/h
205 mph
11.7 L/100 km
20.1 mpg US
24.1 mpg UK

McLaren 675LT Coupe 3.8 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
RUFRtR3.8
13.5 L/100 km
17.4 mpg US
20.9 mpg UK
3.1 s
McLaren675LT Coupe3.8 V8
11.7 L/100 km
20.1 mpg US
24.1 mpg UK
2.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
RUFRtR3.8
538 hp/t
401 kW/t
1.9 kg/hp
13.5 L/100 km
17.4 mpg US
20.9 mpg UK
McLaren675LT Coupe3.8 V8
508 hp/t
379 kW/t
2.0 kg/hp
11.7 L/100 km
20.1 mpg US
24.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleRUFRtR3.8McLaren675LT Coupe3.8 V8
Power
802 hp
598 kW
675 hp
503 kW
Torque
990 Nm
730 lb-ft
700 Nm
516 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.1 s
2.9 s
Top speed
350 km/h
217 mph
330 km/h
205 mph
Lightness
1,490 kg
3,285 lb
1,328 kg
2,928 lb
Fuel consumption
13.5 L/100 km
17.4 mpg US
20.9 mpg UK
11.7 L/100 km
20.1 mpg US
24.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,491 mm
176.8 in
Height
1,295 mm
51.0 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,546 mm
179.0 in
Height-
CO2 score
320 g/km
275 g/km
Power-to-weight score
538 hp/t
401 kW/t
1.9 kg/hp
508 hp/t
379 kW/t
2.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleRUF RtR 3.8McLaren 675LT Coupe 3.8 V8
Consumption13.5 L/100 km17.4 mpg US20.9 mpg UK11.7 L/100 km20.1 mpg US24.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km23.63 LC100 km20.47 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi38.02 LC100 mi32.95 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used2,025 L535 US gal445 UK gal1,755 L464 US gal386 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,544 LC/year3,071 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

RUF RtR 3.8

  • Has 127 hp more
  • Has 290 Nm more
  • Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 30 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Highest CO2 emissions

McLaren 675LT Coupe 3.8 V8

  • Is 162 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Emits 45 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
RUF RtR 3.8
McLaren 675LT Coupe 3.8 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.8
6.3 V12
VS
RUFRtR3.8vsFerrariLaFerrari6.3 V12
3.8 V8
3.8 V8
VS
McLaren675LT Coupe3.8 V8vsMcLaren675LT Spider3.8 V8
3.8
P1 V8
VS
RUFRtR3.8vsMcLarenP1P1 V8
3.8 V8
3.8 V8
VS
McLaren675LT Coupe3.8 V8vsMcLaren650S Coupe3.8 V8
3.8
6.3 V12
VS
RUFRtR3.8vsFerrariF12tdf6.3 V12
3.8
6.3 V12
VS
RUFRtR3.8vsFerrariF12 Berlinetta6.3 V12
3.8 V8
4.0 V8
VS
McLaren675LT Coupe3.8 V8vsMcLaren720S4.0 V8
3.8
6.5 V12
VS
RUFRtR3.8vsLamborghiniAventador LP 750-4 Superveloce6.5 V12
3.8 V8
3.8 V8
VS
McLaren675LT Coupe3.8 V8vsMcLarenMP4-12C Coupe3.8 V8
3.8
7.3 V12
VS
RUFRtR3.8vsAston MartinOne-777.3 V12
3.8 V8
3.8 V8
VS
McLaren675LT Coupe3.8 V8vsMcLaren620R3.8 V8
3.8
6.5 V12
VS
RUFRtR3.8vsLamborghiniAventador LP 700-4 Coupe6.5 V12
RUF RtR 3.8 vs McLaren 675LT Coupe 3.8 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster