Lamborghini Aventador LP 700-4 Coupe
Car comparison
Lamborghini Aventador LP 700-4 Coupe 6.5 V12vsRUF RtR 3.8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRUF RtR
3.8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
RUF RtR 3.8
- Most powerful802 hp598 kW
- Highest torque990 Nm730 lb-ft
- Lightest1,490 kg3,285 lb
- Best power-to-weight538 hp/t401 kW/t1.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption13.5 L/100 km17.4 mpg US20.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption20.2 L/100 km11.6 mpg US14.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions320 g/km
- Best overall score81/100
- Best performance score95/100
- Best economy score71/100
- Best practicality score51/100
Lamborghini Aventador LP 700-4 Coupe 6.5 V12
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.9 s
- Fastest top speed350 km/h217 mph
Specification comparison
| Model | LamborghiniAventador LP 700-4 Coupe6.5 V12 | RUFRtR3.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 700hp522kW | 802hp598kW |
| Torque | 690Nm509lb-ft | 990Nm730lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,575kg3,472lb | 1,490kg3,285lb |
| Top speed | 350 km/h 217 mph | 350 km/h 217 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 39.9s99% target: 347 km/h / 215 mph Calculated | 43.6s99% target: 347 km/h / 215 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 2.9s | 3.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 7.3s Calculated | 7.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 2.8s Calculated | 3.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 17.2L/100 km13.7mpg US16.4mpg UK | 13.5L/100 km17.4mpg US20.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 27.3L/100 km8.6mpg US10.3mpg UK | 20.2L/100 km11.6mpg US14.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 10.1s Calculated | 10.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 444hp/t331kW/t202hp/1000 lb Calculated | 538hp/t401kW/t244hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 438Nm/t293lb-ft/ton Calculated | 664Nm/t445lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 523km325mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 6,498cc397cu in | 3,746cc229cu in |
| Length | 4,780mm188in | 4,491mm177in |
| Width | 2,030mm80in | 2,012mm79in |
| Height | 1,136mm45in | 1,295mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,700mm106in | 2,450mm96in |
| Front track | 1,720mm68in | - |
| Rear track | 1,700mm67in | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | - |
| CO2 emissions | 398g/km | 320g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lamborghini Aventador LP 700-4 Coupe 6.5 V12: Power / Torque
- RUF RtR 3.8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador LP 700-4 Coupe6.5 V12 | 8,250 rpm | 5,500 rpm | 8,500 rpm |
| RUFRtR3.8 | 7,300 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 7,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | LamborghiniAventador LP 700-4 Coupe6.5 V12 | RUFRtR3.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.8 s | 3.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 2.9 s | 3.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 7.3 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 21.8 s | 23.7 s |
| Top speed | 350 km/h 217 mph | 350 km/h 217 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.9 s | 1.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.6 s | 4.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 6.7 s | 7.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 8.6 s | 8.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.1 s | 10.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 241 km/h 150 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador LP 700-4 Coupe6.5 V12 | 700 hp 522 kW |
| RUFRtR3.8 | 802 hp 598 kW |
RUF RtR 3.8 has 102 hp more than Lamborghini Aventador LP 700-4 Coupe 6.5 V12.
The biggest power difference is between Lamborghini Aventador LP 700-4 Coupe 6.5 V12 and RUF RtR 3.8: 102 hp (76 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador LP 700-4 Coupe6.5 V12 | 690 Nm 509 lb-ft |
| RUFRtR3.8 | 990 Nm 730 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador LP 700-4 Coupe6.5 V12 | 1,575 kg 3,472 lb |
| RUFRtR3.8 | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador LP 700-4 Coupe6.5 V12 | 350 km/h 217 mph |
| RUFRtR3.8 | 350 km/h 217 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador LP 700-4 Coupe6.5 V12 | 2.9 s |
| RUFRtR3.8 | 3.1 s |
Although RUF RtR 3.8 has more power, Lamborghini Aventador LP 700-4 Coupe 6.5 V12 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lamborghini Aventador LP 700-4 Coupe 6.5 V12 and RUF RtR 3.8: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador LP 700-4 Coupe6.5 V12 | 17.2 L/100 km 13.7 mpg US 16.4 mpg UK |
| RUFRtR3.8 | 13.5 L/100 km 17.4 mpg US 20.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between RUF RtR 3.8 and Lamborghini Aventador LP 700-4 Coupe 6.5 V12: 3.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador LP 700-4 Coupe6.5 V12 | 444 hp/t 331 kW/t 2.2 kg/hp |
| RUFRtR3.8 | 538 hp/t 401 kW/t 1.9 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador LP 700-4 Coupe6.5 V12 | 700 hp 522 kW | 2.9 s | 350 km/h 217 mph |
| RUFRtR3.8 | 802 hp 598 kW | 3.1 s | 350 km/h 217 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador LP 700-4 Coupe6.5 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RUFRtR3.8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador LP 700-4 Coupe6.5 V12 |
| 17.2 L/100 km 13.7 mpg US 16.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| RUFRtR3.8 |
| 13.5 L/100 km 17.4 mpg US 20.9 mpg UK | ||||||
RUF RtR 3.8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador LP 700-4 Coupe6.5 V12 | 17.2 L/100 km 13.7 mpg US 16.4 mpg UK | 2.9 s |
| RUFRtR3.8 | 13.5 L/100 km 17.4 mpg US 20.9 mpg UK | 3.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador LP 700-4 Coupe6.5 V12 | 444 hp/t 331 kW/t 2.3 kg/hp | 17.2 L/100 km 13.7 mpg US 16.4 mpg UK |
| RUFRtR3.8 | 538 hp/t 401 kW/t 1.9 kg/hp | 13.5 L/100 km 17.4 mpg US 20.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | LamborghiniAventador LP 700-4 Coupe6.5 V12 | RUFRtR3.8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 700 hp 522 kW | 802 hp 598 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 690 Nm 509 lb-ft | 990 Nm 730 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 2.9 s | 3.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 350 km/h 217 mph | 350 km/h 217 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,575 kg 3,472 lb | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 17.2 L/100 km 13.7 mpg US 16.4 mpg UK | 13.5 L/100 km 17.4 mpg US 20.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 523 km 325 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 398 g/km | 320 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 444 hp/t 331 kW/t 2.3 kg/hp | 538 hp/t 401 kW/t 1.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lamborghini Aventador LP 700-4 Coupe 6.5 V12 | RUF RtR 3.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 17.2 L/100 km13.7 mpg US16.4 mpg UK | 13.5 L/100 km17.4 mpg US20.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 30.10 LC100 km | 23.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 48.44 LC100 mi | 38.02 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,580 L682 US gal568 UK gal | 2,025 L535 US gal445 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,515 LC/year | 3,544 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lamborghini Aventador LP 700-4 Coupe 6.5 V12
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
RUF RtR 3.8
- Has 102 hp more
- Has 300 Nm more
- Is 85 kg lighter
- Uses 3.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 94 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 78 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























