Car comparison

RUF RtR 3.8vsFerrari F12tdf 6.3 V12

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

RUF RtR

3.8

802 hp3746 ccGasolineRWDManualTwin-turboCoupe2013-present
VS

Ferrari F12tdf

6.3 V12

780 hp6262 ccGasolineRWDDual-clutchNaturally aspiratedCoupe2015-2017

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

RUF RtR 3.8

  • Fastest top speed
    350 km/h
    217 mph
  • Most powerful
    802 hp
    598 kW
  • Highest torque
    990 Nm
    730 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    13.5 L/100 km
    17.4 mpg US
    20.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    320 g/km
  • Best overall score
    81/100
  • Best performance score
    95/100
  • Best economy score
    71/100
  • Best practicality score
    51/100

Ferrari F12tdf 6.3 V12

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    2.9 s
  • Lightest
    1,415 kg
    3,120 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    551 hp/t
    411 kW/t
    1.8 kg/hp

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelRUFRtR3.8FerrariF12tdf6.3 V12
Power
802hp598kW
780hp582kW
Torque
990Nm730lb-ft
705Nm520lb-ft
Curb weight
1,490kg3,285lb
1,415kg3,120lb
Top speed
350 km/h
217 mph
340 km/h
211 mph
To 99% top speed
43.6s99% target: 347 km/h / 215 mph
Calculated
38.5s99% target: 337 km/h / 209 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.1s
2.9s
0-200 km/h
7.9s
Calculated
7.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.0s
Calculated
2.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
13.5L/100 km17.4mpg US20.9mpg UK
15.4L/100 km15.3mpg US18.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
20.2L/100 km11.6mpg US14.0mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
10.4s
Calculated
10.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
538hp/t401kW/t244hp/1000 lb
Calculated
551hp/t411kW/t250hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
664Nm/t445lb-ft/ton
Calculated
498Nm/t333lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range-
597km371mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,746cc229cu in
6,262cc382cu in
Length
4,491mm177in
4,656mm183in
Width
2,012mm79in
1,961mm77in
Height
1,295mm51in
1,273mm50in
Wheelbase
2,450mm96in
2,720mm107in
Front track-
1,673mm66in
Rear track-
1,648mm65in
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
2
Fuel tank-
92L
CO2 emissions
320g/km
360g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

RUF RtR 3.8Ferrari F12tdf 6.3 V12PowerTorque
  • RUF RtR 3.8: Power / Torque
  • Ferrari F12tdf 6.3 V12: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
RUFRtR3.87,300 rpm4,500 rpm7,550 rpm
FerrariF12tdf6.3 V128,500 rpm6,250 rpm8,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricRUFRtR3.8FerrariF12tdf6.3 V12
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.0 s
2.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.1 s
2.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
7.9 s
7.4 s
0-200 mph
0-322 km/h
23.7 s
24.5 s
Top speed
350 km/h
217 mph
340 km/h
211 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.9 s
1.9 s
330 ft
101 m
4.7 s
4.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.0 s
6.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
8.8 s
8.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
10.4 s
10.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
235 km/h
146 mph
239 km/h
148 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RUFRtR3.8
802 hp
598 kW
FerrariF12tdf6.3 V12
780 hp
582 kW

RUF RtR 3.8 has 22 hp more than Ferrari F12tdf 6.3 V12.

The biggest power difference is between Ferrari F12tdf 6.3 V12 and RUF RtR 3.8: 22 hp (16 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RUFRtR3.8
990 Nm
730 lb-ft
FerrariF12tdf6.3 V12
705 Nm
520 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RUFRtR3.8
1,490 kg
3,285 lb
FerrariF12tdf6.3 V12
1,415 kg
3,120 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RUFRtR3.8
350 km/h
217 mph
FerrariF12tdf6.3 V12
340 km/h
211 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RUFRtR3.83.1 s
FerrariF12tdf6.3 V122.9 s

Although RUF RtR 3.8 has more power, Ferrari F12tdf 6.3 V12 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ferrari F12tdf 6.3 V12 and RUF RtR 3.8: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RUFRtR3.8
13.5 L/100 km
17.4 mpg US
20.9 mpg UK
FerrariF12tdf6.3 V12
15.4 L/100 km
15.3 mpg US
18.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between RUF RtR 3.8 and Ferrari F12tdf 6.3 V12: 1.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RUFRtR3.8
538 hp/t
401 kW/t
1.9 kg/hp
FerrariF12tdf6.3 V12
551 hp/t
411 kW/t
1.8 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
RUFRtR3.8
802 hp
598 kW
3.1 s
350 km/h
217 mph
FerrariF12tdf6.3 V12
780 hp
582 kW
2.9 s
340 km/h
211 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
RUFRtR3.8
Power
802 hp
598 kW
0-100 km/h3.1 s
Top speed
350 km/h
217 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,491 mm
176.8 in
Height
1,295 mm
51.0 in
FerrariF12tdf6.3 V12
Power
780 hp
582 kW
0-100 km/h2.9 s
Top speed
340 km/h
211 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,656 mm
183.3 in
Height
1,273 mm
50.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
RUFRtR3.8
Power
802 hp
598 kW
0-100 km/h3.1 s
Top speed
350 km/h
217 mph
13.5 L/100 km
17.4 mpg US
20.9 mpg UK
FerrariF12tdf6.3 V12
Power
780 hp
582 kW
0-100 km/h2.9 s
Top speed
340 km/h
211 mph
15.4 L/100 km
15.3 mpg US
18.3 mpg UK

RUF RtR 3.8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
RUFRtR3.8
13.5 L/100 km
17.4 mpg US
20.9 mpg UK
3.1 s
FerrariF12tdf6.3 V12
15.4 L/100 km
15.3 mpg US
18.3 mpg UK
2.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
RUFRtR3.8
538 hp/t
401 kW/t
1.9 kg/hp
13.5 L/100 km
17.4 mpg US
20.9 mpg UK
FerrariF12tdf6.3 V12
551 hp/t
411 kW/t
1.8 kg/hp
15.4 L/100 km
15.3 mpg US
18.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleRUFRtR3.8FerrariF12tdf6.3 V12
Power
802 hp
598 kW
780 hp
582 kW
Torque
990 Nm
730 lb-ft
705 Nm
520 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.1 s
2.9 s
Top speed
350 km/h
217 mph
340 km/h
211 mph
Lightness
1,490 kg
3,285 lb
1,415 kg
3,120 lb
Fuel consumption
13.5 L/100 km
17.4 mpg US
20.9 mpg UK
15.4 L/100 km
15.3 mpg US
18.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,491 mm
176.8 in
Height
1,295 mm
51.0 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,656 mm
183.3 in
Height
1,273 mm
50.1 in
Range score
-
597 km
371 mi
CO2 score
320 g/km
360 g/km
Power-to-weight score
538 hp/t
401 kW/t
1.9 kg/hp
551 hp/t
411 kW/t
1.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleRUF RtR 3.8Ferrari F12tdf 6.3 V12
Consumption13.5 L/100 km17.4 mpg US20.9 mpg UK15.4 L/100 km15.3 mpg US18.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km23.63 LC100 km26.95 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi38.02 LC100 mi43.37 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used2,025 L535 US gal445 UK gal2,310 L610 US gal508 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,544 LC/year4,043 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

RUF RtR 3.8

  • Has 22 hp more
  • Has 285 Nm more
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Emits 40 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest

Ferrari F12tdf 6.3 V12

  • Is 75 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
RUF RtR 3.8
Ferrari F12tdf 6.3 V12
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.8
6.3 V12
VS
RUFRtR3.8vsFerrariLaFerrari6.3 V12
6.3 V12
6.3 V12
VS
FerrariF12tdf6.3 V12vsFerrariF12 Berlinetta6.3 V12
3.8
P1 V8
VS
RUFRtR3.8vsMcLarenP1P1 V8
6.3 V12
3.9 V8
VS
FerrariF12tdf6.3 V12vsFerrari488 Pista3.9 V8
3.8
6.5 V12
VS
RUFRtR3.8vsLamborghiniAventador LP 750-4 Superveloce6.5 V12
6.3 V12
3.9 V8
VS
FerrariF12tdf6.3 V12vsFerrari488 Pista Spider3.9 V8
3.8
7.3 V12
VS
RUFRtR3.8vsAston MartinOne-777.3 V12
6.3 V12
6.5 V12
VS
FerrariF12tdf6.3 V12vsFerrari812 Superfast6.5 V12
3.8
6.5 V12
VS
RUFRtR3.8vsLamborghiniAventador LP 700-4 Coupe6.5 V12
6.3 V12
3.9 V8
VS
FerrariF12tdf6.3 V12vsFerrariF8 Tributo3.9 V8
3.8
3.8 V8
VS
RUFRtR3.8vsMcLaren675LT Coupe3.8 V8
6.3 V12
SP1 6.5 V12
VS
FerrariF12tdf6.3 V12vsFerrariMonza SPSP1 6.5 V12
RUF RtR 3.8 vs Ferrari F12tdf 6.3 V12 - car comparison - FastVsFaster