RUF CTR 3
Car comparison
RUF CTR 3 3.7 · Stage 3vsRUF CTR 3 3.7 · Stage 2vsRUF CTR 3 3.7 · Stage 1vsRUF CTR 3 3.7
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRUF CTR 3
3.7 (Stage 2)
RUF CTR 3
3.7 (Stage 1)
RUF CTR 3
3.7
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
RUF CTR 3 3.7 (Stage 3) 1050 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.5 s
- Fastest top speed439 km/h273 mph
- Most powerful1,050 hp783 kW
- Highest torque1,380 Nm1,017 lb-ft
- Lightest1,400 kg3,086 lb
- Best power-to-weight750 hp/t559 kW/t1.3 kg/hp
- Best overall score77/100
- Best performance score96/100
- Best economy score0/100
- Best practicality score38/100
Specification comparison
| Model | RUFCTR 33.7 (Stage 3)1050 hp | RUFCTR 33.7 (Stage 2)910 hp | RUFCTR 33.7 (Stage 1)826 hp | RUFCTR 33.7700 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 1,050hp783kW+350 hp | 910hp679kW+210 hp | 826hp616kW+126 hp | 700hp522kW |
| Torque | 1,380Nm1,017lb-ft+490 Nm | 1,202Nm886lb-ft+312 Nm | 1,086Nm801lb-ft+196 Nm | 890Nm656lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,400kg3,086lb | 1,400kg3,086lb | 1,400kg3,086lb | 1,400kg3,086lb |
| Top speed | 439 km/h 273 mph | 421 km/h 262 mph | 409 km/h 254 mph | 375 km/h 233 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 43.4s99% target: 435 km/h / 270 mph-3.3 s Calculated | 45.4s99% target: 417 km/h / 259 mph-1.3 s Calculated | 46.7s99% target: 405 km/h / 252 mph-0.1 s Calculated | 46.8s99% target: 371 km/h / 231 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 2.5s-0.7 s | 2.7s-0.5 s | 2.9s-0.3 s | 3.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 5.8s-2.0 s Calculated | 6.4s-1.4 s Calculated | 6.9s-0.9 s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 2.4s-0.7 s Calculated | 2.6s-0.5 s Calculated | 2.8s-0.3 s Calculated | 3.1s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 9.2s-1.2 s Calculated | 9.6s-0.8 s Calculated | 9.9s-0.5 s Calculated | 10.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 750hp/t559kW/t340hp/1000 lb Calculated | 650hp/t485kW/t295hp/1000 lb Calculated | 590hp/t440kW/t268hp/1000 lb Calculated | 500hp/t373kW/t227hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 985Nm/t659lb-ft/ton Calculated | 858Nm/t574lb-ft/ton Calculated | 776Nm/t519lb-ft/ton Calculated | 636Nm/t425lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,746cc229cu in | 3,746cc229cu in | 3,746cc229cu in | 3,746cc229cu in |
| Length | 4,445mm175in | 4,445mm175in | 4,445mm175in | 4,445mm175in |
| Width | 1,944mm77in | 1,944mm77in | 1,944mm77in | 1,944mm77in |
| Height | 1,200mm47in | 1,200mm47in | 1,200mm47in | 1,200mm47in |
| Wheelbase | 2,625mm103in | 2,625mm103in | 2,625mm103in | 2,625mm103in |
| Front track | 1,506mm59in | 1,506mm59in | 1,506mm59in | 1,506mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,585mm62in | 1,585mm62in | 1,585mm62in | 1,585mm62in |
| Doors | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- RUF CTR 3 3.7 (Stage 3) 1050 hp: Power / Torque
- RUF CTR 3 3.7 (Stage 2) 910 hp: Power / Torque
- RUF CTR 3 3.7 (Stage 1) 826 hp: Power / Torque
- RUF CTR 3 3.7 700 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RUFCTR 33.7 (Stage 3)1050 hp | 7,000 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
| RUFCTR 33.7 (Stage 2)910 hp | 7,000 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
| RUFCTR 33.7 (Stage 1)826 hp | 7,000 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
| RUFCTR 33.7700 hp | 7,000 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | RUFCTR 33.7 (Stage 3)1050 hp | RUFCTR 33.7 (Stage 2)910 hp | RUFCTR 33.7 (Stage 1)826 hp | RUFCTR 33.7700 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.4 s | 2.6 s | 2.8 s | 3.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 2.5 s | 2.7 s | 2.9 s | 3.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 5.8 s | 6.4 s | 6.9 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 12.5 s | 14.4 s | 15.8 s | 19.9 s |
| Top speed | 439 km/h 273 mph | 421 km/h 262 mph | 409 km/h 254 mph | 375 km/h 233 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 1.7 s | 1.8 s | 1.9 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.3 s | 4.5 s | 4.6 s | 4.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 6.2 s | 6.5 s | 6.7 s | 7.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 7.9 s | 8.2 s | 8.4 s | 8.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 9.2 s | 9.6 s | 9.9 s | 10.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 272 km/h 169 mph | 261 km/h 162 mph | 253 km/h 157 mph | 239 km/h 149 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RUFCTR 33.7 (Stage 3)1050 hp | 1,050 hp 783 kW |
| RUFCTR 33.7 (Stage 2)910 hp | 910 hp 679 kW |
| RUFCTR 33.7 (Stage 1)826 hp | 826 hp 616 kW |
| RUFCTR 33.7700 hp | 700 hp 522 kW |
RUF CTR 3 3.7 (Stage 3) 1050 hp has 350 hp more than RUF CTR 3 3.7 700 hp.
The biggest power difference is between RUF CTR 3 3.7 700 hp and RUF CTR 3 3.7 (Stage 3) 1050 hp: 350 hp (261 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RUFCTR 33.7 (Stage 3)1050 hp | 1,380 Nm 1,017 lb-ft |
| RUFCTR 33.7 (Stage 2)910 hp | 1,202 Nm 886 lb-ft |
| RUFCTR 33.7 (Stage 1)826 hp | 1,086 Nm 801 lb-ft |
| RUFCTR 33.7700 hp | 890 Nm 656 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RUFCTR 33.7 (Stage 3)1050 hp | 1,400 kg 3,086 lb |
| RUFCTR 33.7 (Stage 2)910 hp | 1,400 kg 3,086 lb |
| RUFCTR 33.7 (Stage 1)826 hp | 1,400 kg 3,086 lb |
| RUFCTR 33.7700 hp | 1,400 kg 3,086 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RUFCTR 33.7 (Stage 3)1050 hp | 439 km/h 273 mph |
| RUFCTR 33.7 (Stage 2)910 hp | 421 km/h 262 mph |
| RUFCTR 33.7 (Stage 1)826 hp | 409 km/h 254 mph |
| RUFCTR 33.7700 hp | 375 km/h 233 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RUFCTR 33.7 (Stage 3)1050 hp | 2.5 s |
| RUFCTR 33.7 (Stage 2)910 hp | 2.7 s |
| RUFCTR 33.7 (Stage 1)826 hp | 2.9 s |
| RUFCTR 33.7700 hp | 3.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between RUF CTR 3 3.7 (Stage 3) 1050 hp and RUF CTR 3 3.7 700 hp: 0.7 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are RUF CTR 3 3.7 (Stage 2) 910 hp and RUF CTR 3 3.7 (Stage 1) 826 hp, separated by only 0.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RUFCTR 33.7 (Stage 3)1050 hp | 750 hp/t 559 kW/t 1.3 kg/hp |
| RUFCTR 33.7 (Stage 2)910 hp | 650 hp/t 485 kW/t 1.5 kg/hp |
| RUFCTR 33.7 (Stage 1)826 hp | 590 hp/t 440 kW/t 1.7 kg/hp |
| RUFCTR 33.7700 hp | 500 hp/t 373 kW/t 2.0 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RUFCTR 33.7 (Stage 3)1050 hp | 1,050 hp 783 kW | 2.5 s | 439 km/h 273 mph |
| RUFCTR 33.7 (Stage 2)910 hp | 910 hp 679 kW | 2.7 s | 421 km/h 262 mph |
| RUFCTR 33.7 (Stage 1)826 hp | 826 hp 616 kW | 2.9 s | 409 km/h 254 mph |
| RUFCTR 33.7700 hp | 700 hp 522 kW | 3.2 s | 375 km/h 233 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RUFCTR 33.7 (Stage 3)1050 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RUFCTR 33.7 (Stage 2)910 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RUFCTR 33.7 (Stage 1)826 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RUFCTR 33.7700 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | RUFCTR 33.7 (Stage 3)1050 hp | RUFCTR 33.7 (Stage 2)910 hp | RUFCTR 33.7 (Stage 1)826 hp | RUFCTR 33.7700 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 1,050 hp 783 kW | 910 hp 679 kW | 826 hp 616 kW | 700 hp 522 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 1,380 Nm 1,017 lb-ft | 1,202 Nm 886 lb-ft | 1,086 Nm 801 lb-ft | 890 Nm 656 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 2.5 s | 2.7 s | 2.9 s | 3.2 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 439 km/h 273 mph | 421 km/h 262 mph | 409 km/h 254 mph | 375 km/h 233 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,400 kg 3,086 lb | 1,400 kg 3,086 lb | 1,400 kg 3,086 lb | 1,400 kg 3,086 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 750 hp/t 559 kW/t 1.3 kg/hp | 650 hp/t 485 kW/t 1.5 kg/hp | 590 hp/t 440 kW/t 1.7 kg/hp | 500 hp/t 373 kW/t 2.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
RUF CTR 3 3.7 (Stage 3) 1050 hp
- Has 140 hp more
- Has 178 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 18 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
- Has 100 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
RUF CTR 3 3.7 (Stage 2) 910 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























