RUF CTR 3
Car comparison
RUF CTR 3 3.7vsMercedes-Benz SL Coupe (R230) · Facelift 2008 AMG SL 65 Black Series V12
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz SL Coupe (R230) · Facelift 2008
AMG SL 65 Black Series V12
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
RUF CTR 3 3.7
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.2 s
- Fastest top speed375 km/h233 mph
- Most powerful700 hp522 kW
- Lightest1,400 kg3,086 lb
- Best power-to-weight500 hp/t373 kW/t2.0 kg/hp
- Best overall score77/100
- Best performance score95/100
- Best practicality score38/100
Mercedes-Benz SL Coupe (R230) Facelift 2008 AMG SL 65 Black Series V12
- Highest torque1,000 Nm738 lb-ft
- Best economy score68/100
Specification comparison
| Model | RUFCTR 33.7 | Mercedes-BenzSL Coupe (R230)Facelift 2008AMG SL 65 Black Series V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 700hp522kW | 670hp500kW |
| Torque | 890Nm656lb-ft | 1,000Nm738lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,400kg3,086lb | 1,870kg4,123lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,100kg4,630lb |
| Top speed | 375 km/h 233 mph | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 47.1s99% target: 371 km/h / 231 mph Calculated | 62.3s99% target: 332 km/h / 206 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.2s | 3.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 7.8s Calculated | 10.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.1s Calculated | 3.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 14.4L/100 km16.3mpg US19.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 10.4s Calculated | 11.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 500hp/t373kW/t227hp/1000 lb Calculated | 358hp/t267kW/t163hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 636Nm/t425lb-ft/ton Calculated | 535Nm/t358lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 556km345mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,746cc229cu in | 5,980cc365cu in |
| Length | 4,445mm175in | 4,589mm181in |
| Width | 1,944mm77in | 1,960mm77in |
| Height | 1,200mm47in | 1,310mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,625mm103in | 2,560mm101in |
| Front track | 1,506mm59in | 1,684mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,585mm62in | 1,658mm65in |
| Trunk volume | - | 235L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 339L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | - | 80L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- RUF CTR 3 3.7: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz SL Coupe (R230) Facelift 2008 AMG SL 65 Black Series V12: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RUFCTR 33.7 | 7,000 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzSL Coupe (R230)Facelift 2008AMG SL 65 Black Series V12 | 5,400 rpm | 2,200-4,200 rpm | 5,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | RUFCTR 33.7 | Mercedes-BenzSL Coupe (R230)Facelift 2008AMG SL 65 Black Series V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.1 s | 3.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.2 s | 3.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 7.8 s | 10.8 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 20.0 s | 42.6 s |
| Top speed | 375 km/h 233 mph | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.8 s | 5.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.0 s | 7.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 8.9 s | 9.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.4 s | 11.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 239 km/h 148 mph | 208 km/h 129 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RUFCTR 33.7 | 700 hp 522 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzSL Coupe (R230)Facelift 2008AMG SL 65 Black Series V12 | 670 hp 500 kW |
RUF CTR 3 3.7 has 30 hp more than Mercedes-Benz SL Coupe (R230) Facelift 2008 AMG SL 65 Black Series V12.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz SL Coupe (R230) Facelift 2008 AMG SL 65 Black Series V12 and RUF CTR 3 3.7: 30 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RUFCTR 33.7 | 890 Nm 656 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzSL Coupe (R230)Facelift 2008AMG SL 65 Black Series V12 | 1,000 Nm 738 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RUFCTR 33.7 | 1,400 kg 3,086 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzSL Coupe (R230)Facelift 2008AMG SL 65 Black Series V12 | 1,870 kg 4,123 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RUFCTR 33.7 | 375 km/h 233 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzSL Coupe (R230)Facelift 2008AMG SL 65 Black Series V12 | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RUFCTR 33.7 | 3.2 s |
| Mercedes-BenzSL Coupe (R230)Facelift 2008AMG SL 65 Black Series V12 | 3.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between RUF CTR 3 3.7 and Mercedes-Benz SL Coupe (R230) Facelift 2008 AMG SL 65 Black Series V12: 0.7 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RUFCTR 33.7 | 500 hp/t 373 kW/t 2.0 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzSL Coupe (R230)Facelift 2008AMG SL 65 Black Series V12 | 358 hp/t 267 kW/t 2.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RUFCTR 33.7 | 700 hp 522 kW | 3.2 s | 375 km/h 233 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzSL Coupe (R230)Facelift 2008AMG SL 65 Black Series V12 | 670 hp 500 kW | 3.9 s | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RUFCTR 33.7 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzSL Coupe (R230)Facelift 2008AMG SL 65 Black Series V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | RUFCTR 33.7 | Mercedes-BenzSL Coupe (R230)Facelift 2008AMG SL 65 Black Series V12 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 700 hp 522 kW | 670 hp 500 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 890 Nm 656 lb-ft | 1,000 Nm 738 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.2 s | 3.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 375 km/h 233 mph | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,400 kg 3,086 lb | 1,870 kg 4,123 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 14.4 L/100 km 16.3 mpg US 19.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 556 km 345 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 235 L 8.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 500 hp/t 373 kW/t 2.0 kg/hp | 358 hp/t 267 kW/t 2.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz SL Coupe (R230) Facelift 2008 AMG SL 65 Black Series V12 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.4 L/100 km16.3 mpg US19.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 25.20 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 40.56 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,160 L571 US gal475 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,780 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
RUF CTR 3 3.7
- Has 30 hp more
- Is 470 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 40 km/h (25 mph) higher top speed
- Has 142 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Mercedes-Benz SL Coupe (R230) Facelift 2008 AMG SL 65 Black Series V12
- Has 110 Nm more
Pros
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























