Koenigsegg CCGT
Car comparison
Koenigsegg CCGT 5.0 V8vsRUF CTR 3 3.7
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRUF CTR 3
3.7
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Koenigsegg CCGT 5.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.2 s
- Fastest top speed395 km/h245 mph
- Highest torque920 Nm679 lb-ft
- Lightest1,100 kg2,425 lb
- Best power-to-weight545 hp/t407 kW/t1.8 kg/hp
- Best overall score78/100
- Best performance score97/100
- Best economy score0/100
RUF CTR 3 3.7
- Most powerful700 hp522 kW
- Best practicality score38/100
Specification comparison
| Model | KoenigseggCCGT5.0 V8 | RUFCTR 33.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 600hp447kW | 700hp522kW |
| Torque | 920Nm679lb-ft | 890Nm656lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,100kg2,425lb | 1,400kg3,086lb |
| Top speed | 395 km/h 245 mph | 375 km/h 233 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 105.6s99% target: 391 km/h / 243 mph Calculated | 46.8s99% target: 371 km/h / 231 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.2s | 3.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 9.8s | 7.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.0s Calculated | 3.1s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 10.9s Calculated | 10.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 545hp/t407kW/t247hp/1000 lb Calculated | 500hp/t373kW/t227hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 836Nm/t560lb-ft/ton Calculated | 636Nm/t425lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,000cc305cu in | 3,746cc229cu in |
| Length | 4,293mm169in | 4,445mm175in |
| Width | 1,996mm79in | 1,944mm77in |
| Height | 1,030mm41in | 1,200mm47in |
| Wheelbase | - | 2,625mm103in |
| Front track | - | 1,506mm59in |
| Rear track | - | 1,585mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 50mm2in | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 100L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Koenigsegg CCGT 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
- RUF CTR 3 3.7: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCGT5.0 V8 | - | 5,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| RUFCTR 33.7 | 7,000 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | KoenigseggCCGT5.0 V8 | RUFCTR 33.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.0 s | 3.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.2 s | 3.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 9.8 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 29.6 s | 19.9 s |
| Top speed | 395 km/h 245 mph | 375 km/h 233 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.7 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.7 s | 4.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.1 s | 7.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.2 s | 8.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.9 s | 10.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 212 km/h 132 mph | 239 km/h 149 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCGT5.0 V8 | 600 hp 447 kW |
| RUFCTR 33.7 | 700 hp 522 kW |
RUF CTR 3 3.7 has 100 hp more than Koenigsegg CCGT 5.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Koenigsegg CCGT 5.0 V8 and RUF CTR 3 3.7: 100 hp (75 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCGT5.0 V8 | 920 Nm 679 lb-ft |
| RUFCTR 33.7 | 890 Nm 656 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCGT5.0 V8 | 1,100 kg 2,425 lb |
| RUFCTR 33.7 | 1,400 kg 3,086 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCGT5.0 V8 | 395 km/h 245 mph |
| RUFCTR 33.7 | 375 km/h 233 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCGT5.0 V8 | 3.2 s |
| RUFCTR 33.7 | 3.2 s |
Although RUF CTR 3 3.7 has more power, Koenigsegg CCGT 5.0 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCGT5.0 V8 | 545 hp/t 407 kW/t 1.8 kg/hp |
| RUFCTR 33.7 | 500 hp/t 373 kW/t 2.0 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCGT5.0 V8 | 600 hp 447 kW | 3.2 s | 395 km/h 245 mph |
| RUFCTR 33.7 | 700 hp 522 kW | 3.2 s | 375 km/h 233 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCGT5.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RUFCTR 33.7 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | KoenigseggCCGT5.0 V8 | RUFCTR 33.7 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 600 hp 447 kW | 700 hp 522 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 920 Nm 679 lb-ft | 890 Nm 656 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.2 s | 3.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 395 km/h 245 mph | 375 km/h 233 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,100 kg 2,425 lb | 1,400 kg 3,086 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 545 hp/t 407 kW/t 1.8 kg/hp | 500 hp/t 373 kW/t 2.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
Koenigsegg CCGT 5.0 V8
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 300 kg lighter
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 45 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
RUF CTR 3 3.7
- Has 100 hp more
Pros
- Most powerful
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























