RUF CTR 3
Car comparison
RUF CTR 3 3.7vsMcLaren P1 P1 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMcLaren P1
P1 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
McLaren P1 P1 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.8 s
- Most powerful737 hp550 kW
- Lightest1,395 kg3,075 lb
- Best power-to-weight528 hp/t394 kW/t1.9 kg/hp
- Best economy score85/100
- Best practicality score39/100
RUF CTR 3 3.7
- Fastest top speed375 km/h233 mph
- Highest torque890 Nm656 lb-ft
- Best overall score77/100
- Best performance score95/100
Specification comparison
| Model | RUFCTR 33.7 | McLarenP1P1 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 700hp522kW | 737hp550kW |
| Torque | 890Nm656lb-ft | 720Nm531lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,400kg3,086lb | 1,395kg3,075lb |
| Top speed | 375 km/h 233 mph | 350 km/h 217 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 46.8s99% target: 371 km/h / 231 mph Calculated | 34.6s99% target: 347 km/h / 215 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.2s | 2.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 7.8s Calculated | 6.8s |
| 0-60 mph | 3.1s Calculated | 2.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 10.4s Calculated | 9.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 500hp/t373kW/t227hp/1000 lb Calculated | 528hp/t394kW/t240hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 636Nm/t425lb-ft/ton Calculated | 516Nm/t345lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,746cc229cu in | 3,799cc232cu in |
| Length | 4,445mm175in | 4,588mm181in |
| Width | 1,944mm77in | 1,946mm77in |
| Height | 1,200mm47in | 1,188mm47in |
| Wheelbase | 2,625mm103in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | 1,506mm59in | 1,658mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,585mm62in | 1,604mm63in |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| CO2 emissions | - | 194g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- RUF CTR 3 3.7: Power / Torque
- McLaren P1 P1 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RUFCTR 33.7 | 7,000 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
| McLarenP1P1 V8 | 7,300 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 7,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | RUFCTR 33.7 | McLarenP1P1 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.1 s | 2.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.2 s | 2.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 7.8 s | 6.8 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 19.9 s | 19.4 s |
| Top speed | 375 km/h 233 mph | 350 km/h 217 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 1.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.8 s | 4.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.0 s | 6.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 8.9 s | 8.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.4 s | 9.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 239 km/h 149 mph | 249 km/h 155 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RUFCTR 33.7 | 700 hp 522 kW |
| McLarenP1P1 V8 | 737 hp 550 kW |
McLaren P1 P1 V8 has 37 hp more than RUF CTR 3 3.7.
The biggest power difference is between RUF CTR 3 3.7 and McLaren P1 P1 V8: 37 hp (28 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RUFCTR 33.7 | 890 Nm 656 lb-ft |
| McLarenP1P1 V8 | 720 Nm 531 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RUFCTR 33.7 | 1,400 kg 3,086 lb |
| McLarenP1P1 V8 | 1,395 kg 3,075 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RUFCTR 33.7 | 375 km/h 233 mph |
| McLarenP1P1 V8 | 350 km/h 217 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RUFCTR 33.7 | 3.2 s |
| McLarenP1P1 V8 | 2.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between McLaren P1 P1 V8 and RUF CTR 3 3.7: 0.4 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RUFCTR 33.7 | 500 hp/t 373 kW/t 2.0 kg/hp |
| McLarenP1P1 V8 | 528 hp/t 394 kW/t 1.9 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RUFCTR 33.7 | 700 hp 522 kW | 3.2 s | 375 km/h 233 mph |
| McLarenP1P1 V8 | 737 hp 550 kW | 2.8 s | 350 km/h 217 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RUFCTR 33.7 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| McLarenP1P1 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | RUFCTR 33.7 | McLarenP1P1 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 700 hp 522 kW | 737 hp 550 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 890 Nm 656 lb-ft | 720 Nm 531 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.2 s | 2.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 375 km/h 233 mph | 350 km/h 217 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,400 kg 3,086 lb | 1,395 kg 3,075 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 194 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 500 hp/t 373 kW/t 2.0 kg/hp | 528 hp/t 394 kW/t 1.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | McLaren P1 P1 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.53 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.38 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,179 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
RUF CTR 3 3.7
- Has 170 Nm more
- Has 25 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
McLaren P1 P1 V8
- Has 37 hp more
- Is 5 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 28 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























