Car comparison

RUF CTR 2017 3.6 · Stage 3vsRUF CTR 2017 3.6 · Stage 2vsRUF CTR 2017 3.6 · Stage 1vsRUF CTR 2017 3.6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

RUF CTR 2017

3.6 (Stage 3)

1065 hp3600 ccGasolineRWDManualTwin-turboCoupe2017-present
VS

RUF CTR 2017

3.6 (Stage 2)

923 hp3600 ccGasolineRWDManualTwin-turboCoupe2017-present
VS

RUF CTR 2017

3.6 (Stage 1)

838 hp3600 ccGasolineRWDManualTwin-turboCoupe2017-present
VS

RUF CTR 2017

3.6

710 hp3600 ccGasolineRWDManualTwin-turboCoupe2017-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

RUF CTR 2017 3.6 (Stage 3) 1065 hp

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    2.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    421 km/h
    262 mph
  • Most powerful
    1,065 hp
    794 kW
  • Highest torque
    1,364 Nm
    1,006 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,200 kg
    2,646 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    888 hp/t
    662 kW/t
    1.1 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    12.8 L/100 km
    18.4 mpg US
    22.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    306 g/km
  • Best overall score
    78/100
  • Best performance score
    97/100
  • Best economy score
    73/100
  • Best practicality score
    37/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelRUFCTR 20173.6 (Stage 3)1065 hpRUFCTR 20173.6 (Stage 2)923 hpRUFCTR 20173.6 (Stage 1)838 hpRUFCTR 20173.6710 hp
Power
1,065hp794kW+355 hp
923hp688kW+213 hp
838hp625kW+128 hp
710hp529kW
Torque
1,364Nm1,006lb-ft+484 Nm
1,188Nm876lb-ft+308 Nm
1,074Nm792lb-ft+194 Nm
880Nm649lb-ft
Curb weight
1,200kg2,646lb
1,200kg2,646lb
1,200kg2,646lb
1,200kg2,646lb
Top speed
421 km/h
262 mph
+61 km/h
404 km/h
251 mph
+44 km/h
393 km/h
244 mph
+33 km/h
360 km/h
224 mph
To 99% top speed
44.3s99% target: 417 km/h / 259 mph-10.0 s
Calculated
49.3s99% target: 400 km/h / 249 mph-5.0 s
Calculated
52.6s99% target: 389 km/h / 242 mph-1.7 s
Calculated
54.2s99% target: 356 km/h / 221 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
2.7s-0.8 s
3.0s-0.5 s
3.2s-0.3 s
3.5s
0-200 km/h
6.4s-2.6 s
7.2s-1.8 s
7.8s-1.2 s
9.0s
0-60 mph
2.6s-0.7 s
Calculated
2.9s-0.5 s
Calculated
3.0s-0.3 s
Calculated
3.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
12.8L/100 km18.4mpg US22.1mpg UK
12.8L/100 km18.4mpg US22.1mpg UK
12.8L/100 km18.4mpg US22.1mpg UK
12.8L/100 km18.4mpg US22.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
9.6s-1.3 s
Calculated
10.0s-0.9 s
Calculated
10.4s-0.6 s
Calculated
10.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
888hp/t662kW/t403hp/1000 lb
Calculated
769hp/t574kW/t349hp/1000 lb
Calculated
698hp/t521kW/t317hp/1000 lb
Calculated
592hp/t441kW/t268hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
1,137Nm/t761lb-ft/ton
Calculated
990Nm/t662lb-ft/ton
Calculated
895Nm/t599lb-ft/ton
Calculated
733Nm/t491lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Displacement
3,600cc220cu in
3,600cc220cu in
3,600cc220cu in
3,600cc220cu in
Length
4,210mm166in
4,210mm166in
4,210mm166in
4,210mm166in
Width
1,820mm72in
1,820mm72in
1,820mm72in
1,820mm72in
Doors
2
2
2
2
Seats
2
2
2
2
CO2 emissions
306g/km
306g/km
306g/km
306g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

RUF CTR 2017 3.6 (Stage 3) 1065 hpRUF CTR 2017 3.6 (Stage 2) 923 hpRUF CTR 2017 3.6 (Stage 1) 838 hpRUF CTR 2017 3.6 710 hpPowerTorque
  • RUF CTR 2017 3.6 (Stage 3) 1065 hp: Power / Torque
  • RUF CTR 2017 3.6 (Stage 2) 923 hp: Power / Torque
  • RUF CTR 2017 3.6 (Stage 1) 838 hp: Power / Torque
  • RUF CTR 2017 3.6 710 hp: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
RUFCTR 20173.6 (Stage 3)1065 hp6,750 rpm2,750-4,000 rpm7,000 rpm
RUFCTR 20173.6 (Stage 2)923 hp6,750 rpm2,750-4,000 rpm7,000 rpm
RUFCTR 20173.6 (Stage 1)838 hp6,750 rpm2,750-4,000 rpm7,000 rpm
RUFCTR 20173.6710 hp6,750 rpm2,750-4,000 rpm7,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricRUFCTR 20173.6 (Stage 3)1065 hpRUFCTR 20173.6 (Stage 2)923 hpRUFCTR 20173.6 (Stage 1)838 hpRUFCTR 20173.6710 hp
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
2.6 s
2.9 s
3.0 s
3.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
2.7 s
3.0 s
3.2 s
3.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
6.4 s
7.2 s
7.8 s
9.0 s
0-200 mph
0-322 km/h
14.1 s
16.9 s
19.1 s
25.8 s
Top speed
421 km/h
262 mph
404 km/h
251 mph
393 km/h
244 mph
360 km/h
224 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.8 s
1.9 s
1.9 s
2.0 s
330 ft
101 m
4.5 s
4.7 s
4.8 s
5.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
6.5 s
6.8 s
7.0 s
7.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
8.2 s
8.6 s
8.8 s
9.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
9.6 s
10.0 s
10.4 s
10.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
262 km/h
163 mph
248 km/h
154 mph
240 km/h
149 mph
225 km/h
140 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RUFCTR 20173.6 (Stage 3)1065 hp
1,065 hp
794 kW
RUFCTR 20173.6 (Stage 2)923 hp
923 hp
688 kW
RUFCTR 20173.6 (Stage 1)838 hp
838 hp
625 kW
RUFCTR 20173.6710 hp
710 hp
529 kW

RUF CTR 2017 3.6 (Stage 3) 1065 hp has 355 hp more than RUF CTR 2017 3.6 710 hp.

The biggest power difference is between RUF CTR 2017 3.6 710 hp and RUF CTR 2017 3.6 (Stage 3) 1065 hp: 355 hp (265 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RUFCTR 20173.6 (Stage 3)1065 hp
1,364 Nm
1,006 lb-ft
RUFCTR 20173.6 (Stage 2)923 hp
1,188 Nm
876 lb-ft
RUFCTR 20173.6 (Stage 1)838 hp
1,074 Nm
792 lb-ft
RUFCTR 20173.6710 hp
880 Nm
649 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RUFCTR 20173.6 (Stage 3)1065 hp
1,200 kg
2,646 lb
RUFCTR 20173.6 (Stage 2)923 hp
1,200 kg
2,646 lb
RUFCTR 20173.6 (Stage 1)838 hp
1,200 kg
2,646 lb
RUFCTR 20173.6710 hp
1,200 kg
2,646 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RUFCTR 20173.6 (Stage 3)1065 hp
421 km/h
262 mph
RUFCTR 20173.6 (Stage 2)923 hp
404 km/h
251 mph
RUFCTR 20173.6 (Stage 1)838 hp
393 km/h
244 mph
RUFCTR 20173.6710 hp
360 km/h
224 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RUFCTR 20173.6 (Stage 3)1065 hp2.7 s
RUFCTR 20173.6 (Stage 2)923 hp3.0 s
RUFCTR 20173.6 (Stage 1)838 hp3.2 s
RUFCTR 20173.6710 hp3.5 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between RUF CTR 2017 3.6 (Stage 3) 1065 hp and RUF CTR 2017 3.6 710 hp: 0.8 s.

The closest cars by acceleration are RUF CTR 2017 3.6 (Stage 2) 923 hp and RUF CTR 2017 3.6 (Stage 1) 838 hp, separated by only 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RUFCTR 20173.6 (Stage 3)1065 hp
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK
RUFCTR 20173.6 (Stage 2)923 hp
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK
RUFCTR 20173.6 (Stage 1)838 hp
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK
RUFCTR 20173.6710 hp
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RUFCTR 20173.6 (Stage 3)1065 hp
888 hp/t
662 kW/t
1.1 kg/hp
RUFCTR 20173.6 (Stage 2)923 hp
769 hp/t
574 kW/t
1.3 kg/hp
RUFCTR 20173.6 (Stage 1)838 hp
698 hp/t
521 kW/t
1.4 kg/hp
RUFCTR 20173.6710 hp
592 hp/t
441 kW/t
1.7 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
RUFCTR 20173.6 (Stage 3)1065 hp
1,065 hp
794 kW
2.7 s
421 km/h
262 mph
RUFCTR 20173.6 (Stage 2)923 hp
923 hp
688 kW
3.0 s
404 km/h
251 mph
RUFCTR 20173.6 (Stage 1)838 hp
838 hp
625 kW
3.2 s
393 km/h
244 mph
RUFCTR 20173.6710 hp
710 hp
529 kW
3.5 s
360 km/h
224 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
RUFCTR 20173.6 (Stage 3)1065 hp
Power
1,065 hp
794 kW
0-100 km/h2.7 s
Top speed
421 km/h
262 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,210 mm
165.7 in
Height-
RUFCTR 20173.6 (Stage 2)923 hp
Power
923 hp
688 kW
0-100 km/h3.0 s
Top speed
404 km/h
251 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,210 mm
165.7 in
Height-
RUFCTR 20173.6 (Stage 1)838 hp
Power
838 hp
625 kW
0-100 km/h3.2 s
Top speed
393 km/h
244 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,210 mm
165.7 in
Height-
RUFCTR 20173.6710 hp
Power
710 hp
529 kW
0-100 km/h3.5 s
Top speed
360 km/h
224 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,210 mm
165.7 in
Height-

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
RUFCTR 20173.6 (Stage 3)1065 hp
Power
1,065 hp
794 kW
0-100 km/h2.7 s
Top speed
421 km/h
262 mph
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK
RUFCTR 20173.6 (Stage 2)923 hp
Power
923 hp
688 kW
0-100 km/h3.0 s
Top speed
404 km/h
251 mph
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK
RUFCTR 20173.6 (Stage 1)838 hp
Power
838 hp
625 kW
0-100 km/h3.2 s
Top speed
393 km/h
244 mph
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK
RUFCTR 20173.6710 hp
Power
710 hp
529 kW
0-100 km/h3.5 s
Top speed
360 km/h
224 mph
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK

RUF CTR 2017 3.6 (Stage 3) 1065 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
RUFCTR 20173.6 (Stage 3)1065 hp
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK
2.7 s
RUFCTR 20173.6 (Stage 2)923 hp
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK
3.0 s
RUFCTR 20173.6 (Stage 1)838 hp
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK
3.2 s
RUFCTR 20173.6710 hp
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK
3.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
RUFCTR 20173.6 (Stage 3)1065 hp
888 hp/t
662 kW/t
1.1 kg/hp
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK
RUFCTR 20173.6 (Stage 2)923 hp
769 hp/t
574 kW/t
1.3 kg/hp
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK
RUFCTR 20173.6 (Stage 1)838 hp
698 hp/t
521 kW/t
1.4 kg/hp
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK
RUFCTR 20173.6710 hp
592 hp/t
441 kW/t
1.7 kg/hp
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleRUFCTR 20173.6 (Stage 3)1065 hpRUFCTR 20173.6 (Stage 2)923 hpRUFCTR 20173.6 (Stage 1)838 hpRUFCTR 20173.6710 hp
Power
1,065 hp
794 kW
923 hp
688 kW
838 hp
625 kW
710 hp
529 kW
Torque
1,364 Nm
1,006 lb-ft
1,188 Nm
876 lb-ft
1,074 Nm
792 lb-ft
880 Nm
649 lb-ft
Acceleration
2.7 s
3.0 s
3.2 s
3.5 s
Top speed
421 km/h
262 mph
404 km/h
251 mph
393 km/h
244 mph
360 km/h
224 mph
Lightness
1,200 kg
2,646 lb
1,200 kg
2,646 lb
1,200 kg
2,646 lb
1,200 kg
2,646 lb
Fuel consumption
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,210 mm
165.7 in
Height-
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,210 mm
165.7 in
Height-
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,210 mm
165.7 in
Height-
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,210 mm
165.7 in
Height-
CO2 score
306 g/km
306 g/km
306 g/km
306 g/km
Power-to-weight score
888 hp/t
662 kW/t
1.1 kg/hp
769 hp/t
574 kW/t
1.3 kg/hp
698 hp/t
521 kW/t
1.4 kg/hp
592 hp/t
441 kW/t
1.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleRUF CTR 2017 3.6 (Stage 3) 1065 hpRUF CTR 2017 3.6 (Stage 2) 923 hpRUF CTR 2017 3.6 (Stage 1) 838 hpRUF CTR 2017 3.6 710 hp
Consumption12.8 L/100 km18.4 mpg US22.1 mpg UK12.8 L/100 km18.4 mpg US22.1 mpg UK12.8 L/100 km18.4 mpg US22.1 mpg UK12.8 L/100 km18.4 mpg US22.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km22.40 LC100 km22.40 LC100 km22.40 LC100 km22.40 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi36.05 LC100 mi36.05 LC100 mi36.05 LC100 mi36.05 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,920 L507 US gal422 UK gal1,920 L507 US gal422 UK gal1,920 L507 US gal422 UK gal1,920 L507 US gal422 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,360 LC/year3,360 LC/year3,360 LC/year3,360 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

RUF CTR 2017 3.6 (Stage 3) 1065 hp

  • Has 142 hp more
  • Has 176 Nm more
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 17 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 118 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
RUF CTR 2017 3.6
Compare selected cars
1 vehicle selected

Popular comparisons

3.6
3.9 V8
VS
RUFCTR 20173.6vsFerrari488 Pista3.9 V8
3.6
3.9 V8
VS
RUFCTR 20173.6vsFerrari488 Pista Spider3.9 V8
3.6
6.3 V12
VS
RUFCTR 20173.6vsFerrariF12tdf6.3 V12
3.6
6.5 V12
VS
RUFCTR 20173.6vsLamborghiniAventador Miura Homage6.5 V12
3.6
GT2 RS 3.8
VS
RUFCTR 20173.6vsPorsche911 (991 II)GT2 RS 3.8
3.6
6.5 V12
VS
RUFCTR 20173.6vsLamborghiniAventador LP 750-4 Superveloce6.5 V12
3.6
3.8 V8
VS
RUFCTR 20173.6vsMcLaren675LT Coupe3.8 V8
3.6
3.9 V8
VS
RUFCTR 20173.6vsFerrari488 GTB3.9 V8
3.6
3.9 V8
VS
RUFCTR 20173.6vsFerrari488 Spider3.9 V8
3.6
P1 V8
VS
RUFCTR 20173.6vsMcLarenP1P1 V8
3.6
5.2 V12
VS
RUFCTR 20173.6vsAston MartinDBS Superleggera5.2 V12
3.6
4.0 V8
VS
RUFCTR 20173.6vsMcLaren720S4.0 V8
RUF CTR 2017 3.6 · Stage 3 vs RUF CTR 2017 3.6 · Stage 2 vs RUF CTR 2017 3.6 · Stage 1 vs RUF CTR 2017 3.6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster