Car comparison

RUF CTR 2017 3.6vsFerrari F12tdf 6.3 V12

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

RUF CTR 2017

3.6

710 hp3600 ccGasolineRWDManualTwin-turboCoupe2017-present
VS

Ferrari F12tdf

6.3 V12

780 hp6262 ccGasolineRWDDual-clutchNaturally aspiratedCoupe2015-2017

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

RUF CTR 2017 3.6

  • Fastest top speed
    360 km/h
    224 mph
  • Highest torque
    880 Nm
    649 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,200 kg
    2,646 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    592 hp/t
    441 kW/t
    1.7 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    12.8 L/100 km
    18.4 mpg US
    22.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    306 g/km
  • Best overall score
    77/100
  • Best performance score
    96/100
  • Best economy score
    73/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelRUFCTR 20173.6FerrariF12tdf6.3 V12
Power
710hp529kW
780hp582kW
Torque
880Nm649lb-ft
705Nm520lb-ft
Curb weight
1,200kg2,646lb
1,415kg3,120lb
Top speed
360 km/h
224 mph
340 km/h
211 mph
To 99% top speed
54.2s99% target: 356 km/h / 221 mph
Calculated
38.5s99% target: 337 km/h / 209 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.5s
2.9s
0-200 km/h
9.0s
7.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.4s
Calculated
2.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
12.8L/100 km18.4mpg US22.1mpg UK
15.4L/100 km15.3mpg US18.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
10.9s
Calculated
10.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
592hp/t441kW/t268hp/1000 lb
Calculated
551hp/t411kW/t250hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
733Nm/t491lb-ft/ton
Calculated
498Nm/t333lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range-
597km371mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,600cc220cu in
6,262cc382cu in
Length
4,210mm166in
4,656mm183in
Width
1,820mm72in
1,961mm77in
Height-
1,273mm50in
Wheelbase-
2,720mm107in
Front track-
1,673mm66in
Rear track-
1,648mm65in
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
2
Fuel tank-
92L
CO2 emissions
306g/km
360g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

RUF CTR 2017 3.6Ferrari F12tdf 6.3 V12PowerTorque
  • RUF CTR 2017 3.6: Power / Torque
  • Ferrari F12tdf 6.3 V12: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
RUFCTR 20173.66,750 rpm2,750-4,000 rpm7,000 rpm
FerrariF12tdf6.3 V128,500 rpm6,250 rpm8,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricRUFCTR 20173.6FerrariF12tdf6.3 V12
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.4 s
2.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.5 s
2.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
9.0 s
7.4 s
0-200 mph
0-322 km/h
25.8 s
24.5 s
Top speed
360 km/h
224 mph
340 km/h
211 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.0 s
1.9 s
330 ft
101 m
5.0 s
4.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.3 s
6.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.3 s
8.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
10.9 s
10.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
225 km/h
140 mph
239 km/h
148 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RUFCTR 20173.6
710 hp
529 kW
FerrariF12tdf6.3 V12
780 hp
582 kW

Ferrari F12tdf 6.3 V12 has 70 hp more than RUF CTR 2017 3.6.

The biggest power difference is between RUF CTR 2017 3.6 and Ferrari F12tdf 6.3 V12: 70 hp (52 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RUFCTR 20173.6
880 Nm
649 lb-ft
FerrariF12tdf6.3 V12
705 Nm
520 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RUFCTR 20173.6
1,200 kg
2,646 lb
FerrariF12tdf6.3 V12
1,415 kg
3,120 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RUFCTR 20173.6
360 km/h
224 mph
FerrariF12tdf6.3 V12
340 km/h
211 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RUFCTR 20173.63.5 s
FerrariF12tdf6.3 V122.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ferrari F12tdf 6.3 V12 and RUF CTR 2017 3.6: 0.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RUFCTR 20173.6
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK
FerrariF12tdf6.3 V12
15.4 L/100 km
15.3 mpg US
18.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between RUF CTR 2017 3.6 and Ferrari F12tdf 6.3 V12: 2.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RUFCTR 20173.6
592 hp/t
441 kW/t
1.7 kg/hp
FerrariF12tdf6.3 V12
551 hp/t
411 kW/t
1.8 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
RUFCTR 20173.6
710 hp
529 kW
3.5 s
360 km/h
224 mph
FerrariF12tdf6.3 V12
780 hp
582 kW
2.9 s
340 km/h
211 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
RUFCTR 20173.6
Power
710 hp
529 kW
0-100 km/h3.5 s
Top speed
360 km/h
224 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,210 mm
165.7 in
Height-
FerrariF12tdf6.3 V12
Power
780 hp
582 kW
0-100 km/h2.9 s
Top speed
340 km/h
211 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,656 mm
183.3 in
Height
1,273 mm
50.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
RUFCTR 20173.6
Power
710 hp
529 kW
0-100 km/h3.5 s
Top speed
360 km/h
224 mph
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK
FerrariF12tdf6.3 V12
Power
780 hp
582 kW
0-100 km/h2.9 s
Top speed
340 km/h
211 mph
15.4 L/100 km
15.3 mpg US
18.3 mpg UK

RUF CTR 2017 3.6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
RUFCTR 20173.6
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK
3.5 s
FerrariF12tdf6.3 V12
15.4 L/100 km
15.3 mpg US
18.3 mpg UK
2.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
RUFCTR 20173.6
592 hp/t
441 kW/t
1.7 kg/hp
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK
FerrariF12tdf6.3 V12
551 hp/t
411 kW/t
1.8 kg/hp
15.4 L/100 km
15.3 mpg US
18.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleRUFCTR 20173.6FerrariF12tdf6.3 V12
Power
710 hp
529 kW
780 hp
582 kW
Torque
880 Nm
649 lb-ft
705 Nm
520 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.5 s
2.9 s
Top speed
360 km/h
224 mph
340 km/h
211 mph
Lightness
1,200 kg
2,646 lb
1,415 kg
3,120 lb
Fuel consumption
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK
15.4 L/100 km
15.3 mpg US
18.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,210 mm
165.7 in
Height-
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,656 mm
183.3 in
Height
1,273 mm
50.1 in
Range score
-
597 km
371 mi
CO2 score
306 g/km
360 g/km
Power-to-weight score
592 hp/t
441 kW/t
1.7 kg/hp
551 hp/t
411 kW/t
1.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleRUF CTR 2017 3.6Ferrari F12tdf 6.3 V12
Consumption12.8 L/100 km18.4 mpg US22.1 mpg UK15.4 L/100 km15.3 mpg US18.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km22.40 LC100 km26.95 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi36.05 LC100 mi43.37 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,920 L507 US gal422 UK gal2,310 L610 US gal508 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,360 LC/year4,043 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

RUF CTR 2017 3.6

  • Has 175 Nm more
  • Is 215 kg lighter
  • Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 2.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 40 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Emits 54 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power

Ferrari F12tdf 6.3 V12

  • Has 70 hp more
  • Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
RUF CTR 2017 3.6
Ferrari F12tdf 6.3 V12
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.6
3.9 V8
VS
RUFCTR 20173.6vsFerrari488 Pista3.9 V8
6.3 V12
6.3 V12
VS
FerrariF12tdf6.3 V12vsFerrariF12 Berlinetta6.3 V12
3.6
3.9 V8
VS
RUFCTR 20173.6vsFerrari488 Pista Spider3.9 V8
6.3 V12
6.3 V12
VS
FerrariF12tdf6.3 V12vsFerrariLaFerrari6.3 V12
3.6
6.5 V12
VS
RUFCTR 20173.6vsLamborghiniAventador Miura Homage6.5 V12
3.6
GT2 RS 3.8
VS
RUFCTR 20173.6vsPorsche911 (991 II)GT2 RS 3.8
3.6
6.5 V12
VS
RUFCTR 20173.6vsLamborghiniAventador LP 750-4 Superveloce6.5 V12
6.3 V12
6.5 V12
VS
FerrariF12tdf6.3 V12vsFerrari812 Superfast6.5 V12
3.6
3.8 V8
VS
RUFCTR 20173.6vsMcLaren675LT Coupe3.8 V8
6.3 V12
3.9 V8
VS
FerrariF12tdf6.3 V12vsFerrariF8 Tributo3.9 V8
3.6
3.9 V8
VS
RUFCTR 20173.6vsFerrari488 GTB3.9 V8
6.3 V12
SP1 6.5 V12
VS
FerrariF12tdf6.3 V12vsFerrariMonza SPSP1 6.5 V12
RUF CTR 2017 3.6 vs Ferrari F12tdf 6.3 V12 - car comparison - FastVsFaster