Car comparison

RUF CTR 2017 3.6vsLamborghini Aventador LP 750-4 Superveloce 6.5 V12

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

RUF CTR 2017

3.6

710 hp3600 ccGasolineRWDManualTwin-turboCoupe2017-present
VS

Lamborghini Aventador LP 750-4 Superveloce

6.5 V12

750 hp6498 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedCoupe2015-2017

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

RUF CTR 2017 3.6

  • Fastest top speed
    360 km/h
    224 mph
  • Highest torque
    880 Nm
    649 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,200 kg
    2,646 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    592 hp/t
    441 kW/t
    1.7 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    12.8 L/100 km
    18.4 mpg US
    22.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    306 g/km
  • Best overall score
    77/100
  • Best performance score
    96/100
  • Best economy score
    73/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelRUFCTR 20173.6LamborghiniAventador LP 750-4 Superveloce6.5 V12
Power
710hp529kW
750hp559kW
Torque
880Nm649lb-ft
690Nm509lb-ft
Curb weight
1,200kg2,646lb
1,525kg3,362lb
Top speed
360 km/h
224 mph
350 km/h
217 mph
To 99% top speed
54.2s99% target: 356 km/h / 221 mph
Calculated
37.7s99% target: 347 km/h / 215 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.5s
2.8s
0-200 km/h
9.0s
7.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.4s
Calculated
2.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
12.8L/100 km18.4mpg US22.1mpg UK
16L/100 km14.7mpg US17.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
24.7L/100 km9.5mpg US11.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
10.9s
Calculated
9.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
592hp/t441kW/t268hp/1000 lb
Calculated
492hp/t367kW/t223hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
733Nm/t491lb-ft/ton
Calculated
452Nm/t303lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range-
563km350mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,600cc220cu in
6,498cc397cu in
Length
4,210mm166in
4,835mm190in
Width
1,820mm72in
2,030mm80in
Height-
1,136mm45in
Wheelbase-
2,700mm106in
Front track-
1,720mm68in
Rear track-
1,680mm66in
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
2
Fuel tank-
90L
CO2 emissions
306g/km
370g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

RUF CTR 2017 3.6Lamborghini Aventador LP 750-4 Superveloce 6.5 V12PowerTorque
  • RUF CTR 2017 3.6: Power / Torque
  • Lamborghini Aventador LP 750-4 Superveloce 6.5 V12: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
RUFCTR 20173.66,750 rpm2,750-4,000 rpm7,000 rpm
LamborghiniAventador LP 750-4 Superveloce6.5 V128,400 rpm5,500 rpm8,650 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricRUFCTR 20173.6LamborghiniAventador LP 750-4 Superveloce6.5 V12
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.4 s
2.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.5 s
2.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
9.0 s
7.0 s
0-200 mph
0-322 km/h
25.8 s
20.7 s
Top speed
360 km/h
224 mph
350 km/h
217 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.0 s
1.8 s
330 ft
101 m
5.0 s
4.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.3 s
6.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.3 s
8.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
10.9 s
9.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
225 km/h
140 mph
245 km/h
152 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RUFCTR 20173.6
710 hp
529 kW
LamborghiniAventador LP 750-4 Superveloce6.5 V12
750 hp
559 kW

Lamborghini Aventador LP 750-4 Superveloce 6.5 V12 has 40 hp more than RUF CTR 2017 3.6.

The biggest power difference is between RUF CTR 2017 3.6 and Lamborghini Aventador LP 750-4 Superveloce 6.5 V12: 40 hp (30 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RUFCTR 20173.6
880 Nm
649 lb-ft
LamborghiniAventador LP 750-4 Superveloce6.5 V12
690 Nm
509 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RUFCTR 20173.6
1,200 kg
2,646 lb
LamborghiniAventador LP 750-4 Superveloce6.5 V12
1,525 kg
3,362 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RUFCTR 20173.6
360 km/h
224 mph
LamborghiniAventador LP 750-4 Superveloce6.5 V12
350 km/h
217 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lamborghini Aventador LP 750-4 Superveloce 6.5 V12 and RUF CTR 2017 3.6: 0.7 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RUFCTR 20173.6
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK
LamborghiniAventador LP 750-4 Superveloce6.5 V12
16.0 L/100 km
14.7 mpg US
17.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between RUF CTR 2017 3.6 and Lamborghini Aventador LP 750-4 Superveloce 6.5 V12: 3.2 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RUFCTR 20173.6
592 hp/t
441 kW/t
1.7 kg/hp
LamborghiniAventador LP 750-4 Superveloce6.5 V12
492 hp/t
367 kW/t
2.0 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
RUFCTR 20173.6
710 hp
529 kW
3.5 s
360 km/h
224 mph
LamborghiniAventador LP 750-4 Superveloce6.5 V12
750 hp
559 kW
2.8 s
350 km/h
217 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
RUFCTR 20173.6
Power
710 hp
529 kW
0-100 km/h3.5 s
Top speed
360 km/h
224 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,210 mm
165.7 in
Height-
LamborghiniAventador LP 750-4 Superveloce6.5 V12
Power
750 hp
559 kW
0-100 km/h2.8 s
Top speed
350 km/h
217 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,835 mm
190.4 in
Height
1,136 mm
44.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
RUFCTR 20173.6
Power
710 hp
529 kW
0-100 km/h3.5 s
Top speed
360 km/h
224 mph
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK
LamborghiniAventador LP 750-4 Superveloce6.5 V12
Power
750 hp
559 kW
0-100 km/h2.8 s
Top speed
350 km/h
217 mph
16.0 L/100 km
14.7 mpg US
17.7 mpg UK

RUF CTR 2017 3.6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
RUFCTR 20173.6
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK
3.5 s
LamborghiniAventador LP 750-4 Superveloce6.5 V12
16.0 L/100 km
14.7 mpg US
17.7 mpg UK
2.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
RUFCTR 20173.6
592 hp/t
441 kW/t
1.7 kg/hp
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK
LamborghiniAventador LP 750-4 Superveloce6.5 V12
492 hp/t
367 kW/t
2.0 kg/hp
16.0 L/100 km
14.7 mpg US
17.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleRUFCTR 20173.6LamborghiniAventador LP 750-4 Superveloce6.5 V12
Power
710 hp
529 kW
750 hp
559 kW
Torque
880 Nm
649 lb-ft
690 Nm
509 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.5 s
2.8 s
Top speed
360 km/h
224 mph
350 km/h
217 mph
Lightness
1,200 kg
2,646 lb
1,525 kg
3,362 lb
Fuel consumption
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK
16.0 L/100 km
14.7 mpg US
17.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,210 mm
165.7 in
Height-
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,835 mm
190.4 in
Height
1,136 mm
44.7 in
Range score
-
563 km
350 mi
CO2 score
306 g/km
370 g/km
Power-to-weight score
592 hp/t
441 kW/t
1.7 kg/hp
492 hp/t
367 kW/t
2.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleRUF CTR 2017 3.6Lamborghini Aventador LP 750-4 Superveloce 6.5 V12
Consumption12.8 L/100 km18.4 mpg US22.1 mpg UK16 L/100 km14.7 mpg US17.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km22.40 LC100 km28.00 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi36.05 LC100 mi45.06 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,920 L507 US gal422 UK gal2,400 L634 US gal528 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,360 LC/year4,200 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

RUF CTR 2017 3.6

  • Has 190 Nm more
  • Is 325 kg lighter
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 3.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 100 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Emits 64 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
RUF CTR 2017 3.6
Lamborghini Aventador LP 750-4 Superveloce 6.5 V12
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

RUF CTR 2017 3.6 vs Lamborghini Aventador LP 750-4 Superveloce 6.5 V12 - car comparison - FastVsFaster