Car comparison

RUF CTR 2017 3.6vsMcLaren P1 P1 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

RUF CTR 2017

3.6

710 hp3600 ccGasolineRWDManualTwin-turboCoupe2017-present
VS

McLaren P1

P1 V8

737 hp3799 ccHybridAWDAutomaticTwin-turboCoupe2013-2015

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

McLaren P1 P1 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    2.8 s
  • Most powerful
    737 hp
    550 kW
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.3 L/100 km
    28.3 mpg US
    34.0 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    194 g/km
  • Best economy score
    85/100
  • Best practicality score
    39/100

RUF CTR 2017 3.6

  • Fastest top speed
    360 km/h
    224 mph
  • Highest torque
    880 Nm
    649 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,200 kg
    2,646 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    592 hp/t
    441 kW/t
    1.7 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    77/100
  • Best performance score
    96/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelRUFCTR 20173.6McLarenP1P1 V8
Power
710hp529kW
737hp550kW
Torque
880Nm649lb-ft
720Nm531lb-ft
Curb weight
1,200kg2,646lb
1,395kg3,075lb
Top speed
360 km/h
224 mph
350 km/h
217 mph
To 99% top speed
54.2s99% target: 356 km/h / 221 mph
Calculated
34.6s99% target: 347 km/h / 215 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.5s
2.8s
0-200 km/h
9.0s
6.8s
0-60 mph
3.4s
Calculated
2.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
12.8L/100 km18.4mpg US22.1mpg UK
8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK
Quarter mile
10.9s
Calculated
9.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
592hp/t441kW/t268hp/1000 lb
Calculated
528hp/t394kW/t240hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
733Nm/t491lb-ft/ton
Calculated
516Nm/t345lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Displacement
3,600cc220cu in
3,799cc232cu in
Length
4,210mm166in
4,588mm181in
Width
1,820mm72in
1,946mm77in
Height-
1,188mm47in
Wheelbase-
2,670mm105in
Front track-
1,658mm65in
Rear track-
1,604mm63in
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
2
CO2 emissions
306g/km
194g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

RUF CTR 2017 3.6McLaren P1 P1 V8PowerTorque
  • RUF CTR 2017 3.6: Power / Torque
  • McLaren P1 P1 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
RUFCTR 20173.66,750 rpm2,750-4,000 rpm7,000 rpm
McLarenP1P1 V87,300 rpm4,000 rpm7,550 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricRUFCTR 20173.6McLarenP1P1 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.4 s
2.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.5 s
2.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
9.0 s
6.8 s
0-200 mph
0-322 km/h
25.8 s
19.4 s
Top speed
360 km/h
224 mph
350 km/h
217 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.0 s
1.9 s
330 ft
101 m
5.0 s
4.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.3 s
6.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.3 s
8.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
10.9 s
9.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
225 km/h
140 mph
249 km/h
155 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RUFCTR 20173.6
710 hp
529 kW
McLarenP1P1 V8
737 hp
550 kW

McLaren P1 P1 V8 has 27 hp more than RUF CTR 2017 3.6.

The biggest power difference is between RUF CTR 2017 3.6 and McLaren P1 P1 V8: 27 hp (20 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RUFCTR 20173.6
880 Nm
649 lb-ft
McLarenP1P1 V8
720 Nm
531 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RUFCTR 20173.6
1,200 kg
2,646 lb
McLarenP1P1 V8
1,395 kg
3,075 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RUFCTR 20173.6
360 km/h
224 mph
McLarenP1P1 V8
350 km/h
217 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RUFCTR 20173.63.5 s
McLarenP1P1 V82.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between McLaren P1 P1 V8 and RUF CTR 2017 3.6: 0.7 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RUFCTR 20173.6
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK
McLarenP1P1 V8
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between McLaren P1 P1 V8 and RUF CTR 2017 3.6: 4.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RUFCTR 20173.6
592 hp/t
441 kW/t
1.7 kg/hp
McLarenP1P1 V8
528 hp/t
394 kW/t
1.9 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
RUFCTR 20173.6
710 hp
529 kW
3.5 s
360 km/h
224 mph
McLarenP1P1 V8
737 hp
550 kW
2.8 s
350 km/h
217 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
RUFCTR 20173.6
Power
710 hp
529 kW
0-100 km/h3.5 s
Top speed
360 km/h
224 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,210 mm
165.7 in
Height-
McLarenP1P1 V8
Power
737 hp
550 kW
0-100 km/h2.8 s
Top speed
350 km/h
217 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,588 mm
180.6 in
Height
1,188 mm
46.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
RUFCTR 20173.6
Power
710 hp
529 kW
0-100 km/h3.5 s
Top speed
360 km/h
224 mph
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK
McLarenP1P1 V8
Power
737 hp
550 kW
0-100 km/h2.8 s
Top speed
350 km/h
217 mph
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK

McLaren P1 P1 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
RUFCTR 20173.6
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK
3.5 s
McLarenP1P1 V8
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
2.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
RUFCTR 20173.6
592 hp/t
441 kW/t
1.7 kg/hp
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK
McLarenP1P1 V8
528 hp/t
394 kW/t
1.9 kg/hp
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleRUFCTR 20173.6McLarenP1P1 V8
Power
710 hp
529 kW
737 hp
550 kW
Torque
880 Nm
649 lb-ft
720 Nm
531 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.5 s
2.8 s
Top speed
360 km/h
224 mph
350 km/h
217 mph
Lightness
1,200 kg
2,646 lb
1,395 kg
3,075 lb
Fuel consumption
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,210 mm
165.7 in
Height-
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,588 mm
180.6 in
Height
1,188 mm
46.8 in
CO2 score
306 g/km
194 g/km
Power-to-weight score
592 hp/t
441 kW/t
1.7 kg/hp
528 hp/t
394 kW/t
1.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleRUF CTR 2017 3.6McLaren P1 P1 V8
Consumption12.8 L/100 km18.4 mpg US22.1 mpg UK8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km22.40 LC100 km14.53 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi36.05 LC100 mi23.38 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,920 L507 US gal422 UK gal1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,360 LC/year2,179 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

RUF CTR 2017 3.6

  • Has 160 Nm more
  • Is 195 kg lighter
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 63 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Highest CO2 emissions

McLaren P1 P1 V8

  • Has 27 hp more
  • Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 4.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Emits 112 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
RUF CTR 2017 3.6
McLaren P1 P1 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.6
3.9 V8
VS
RUFCTR 20173.6vsFerrari488 Pista3.9 V8
P1 V8
3.8 V8
VS
McLarenP1P1 V8vsMcLaren675LT Coupe3.8 V8
3.6
3.9 V8
VS
RUFCTR 20173.6vsFerrari488 Pista Spider3.9 V8
P1 V8
4.0 V8
VS
McLarenP1P1 V8vsMcLaren720S4.0 V8
3.6
6.3 V12
VS
RUFCTR 20173.6vsFerrariF12tdf6.3 V12
P1 V8
3.8 V8
VS
McLarenP1P1 V8vsMcLaren650S Coupe3.8 V8
3.6
6.5 V12
VS
RUFCTR 20173.6vsLamborghiniAventador Miura Homage6.5 V12
P1 V8
3.8 V8
VS
McLarenP1P1 V8vsMcLarenMP4-12C Coupe3.8 V8
3.6
GT2 RS 3.8
VS
RUFCTR 20173.6vsPorsche911 (991 II)GT2 RS 3.8
P1 V8
6.3 V12
VS
McLarenP1P1 V8vsFerrariF12 Berlinetta6.3 V12
3.6
6.5 V12
VS
RUFCTR 20173.6vsLamborghiniAventador LP 750-4 Superveloce6.5 V12
P1 V8
4.0 V8
VS
McLarenP1P1 V8vsMcLaren765LT4.0 V8
RUF CTR 2017 3.6 vs McLaren P1 P1 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster