Car comparison

Rimac Concept One 90 kWhvsTechrules Ren RS 28.4 kWh

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Rimac Concept One

90 kWh

1224 hpElectricAWDCVTCoupe2016-present
VS

Techrules Ren

RS 28.4 kWh

1305 hpDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedCoupe2018-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Techrules Ren RS 28.4 kWh

  • Most powerful
    1,305 hp
    973 kW
  • Lightest
    1,854 kg
    4,087 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    704 hp/t
    525 kW/t
    1.4 kg/hp
  • Best performance score
    94/100
  • Best economy score
    87/100

Rimac Concept One 90 kWh

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    2.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    355 km/h
    221 mph
  • Best overall score
    75/100
  • Best practicality score
    37/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelRimacConcept One90 kWhTechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWh
Power
1,224hp913kW
1,305hp973kW
Torque-
2,340Nm1,726lb-ft
Curb weight
1,900kg4,189lb
1,854kg4,087lb
Top speed
355 km/h
221 mph
330 km/h
205 mph
To 99% top speed
33.7s99% target: 351 km/h / 218 mph
Calculated
40.2s99% target: 327 km/h / 203 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
2.5s
3.0s
0-200 km/h
6.2s
Calculated
7.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
2.4s
Calculated
2.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption-
7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
9.4s
Calculated
10.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
644hp/t480kW/t292hp/1000 lb
Calculated
704hp/t525kW/t319hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight-
1,262Nm/t845lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range-
1,067km663mi
Calculated
Length
4,146mm163in
5,072mm200in
Width
1,854mm73in
2,055mm81in
Height
1,070mm42in
1,260mm50in
Wheelbase
2,563mm101in
2,724mm107in
Front track-
1,786mm70in
Rear track-
1,775mm70in
Ground clearance
115mm5in
120mm5in
Doors
2
1
Seats
2
1
Fuel tank-
80L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricRimacConcept One90 kWhTechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWh
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
2.4 s
2.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
2.5 s
3.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
6.2 s
7.9 s
0-200 mph
0-322 km/h
17.5 s
32.2 s
Top speed
355 km/h
221 mph
330 km/h
205 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.7 s
1.9 s
330 ft
101 m
4.3 s
4.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
6.3 s
6.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
8.0 s
8.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
9.4 s
10.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
255 km/h
159 mph
232 km/h
144 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RimacConcept One90 kWh
1,224 hp
913 kW
TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWh
1,305 hp
973 kW

Techrules Ren RS 28.4 kWh has 81 hp more than Rimac Concept One 90 kWh.

The biggest power difference is between Rimac Concept One 90 kWh and Techrules Ren RS 28.4 kWh: 81 hp (60 kW).

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RimacConcept One90 kWh
1,900 kg
4,189 lb
TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWh
1,854 kg
4,087 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RimacConcept One90 kWh
355 km/h
221 mph
TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWh
330 km/h
205 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RimacConcept One90 kWh2.5 s
TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWh3.0 s

Although Techrules Ren RS 28.4 kWh has more power, Rimac Concept One 90 kWh is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Rimac Concept One 90 kWh and Techrules Ren RS 28.4 kWh: 0.5 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RimacConcept One90 kWh
644 hp/t
480 kW/t
1.6 kg/hp
TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWh
704 hp/t
525 kW/t
1.4 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
RimacConcept One90 kWh
1,224 hp
913 kW
2.5 s
355 km/h
221 mph
TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWh
1,305 hp
973 kW
3.0 s
330 km/h
205 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
RimacConcept One90 kWh
Power
1,224 hp
913 kW
0-100 km/h2.5 s
Top speed
355 km/h
221 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,146 mm
163.2 in
Height
1,070 mm
42.1 in
TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWh
Power
1,305 hp
973 kW
0-100 km/h3.0 s
Top speed
330 km/h
205 mph
Doors/seats
1 doors
1 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,072 mm
199.7 in
Height
1,260 mm
49.6 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleRimacConcept One90 kWhTechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWh
Power
1,224 hp
913 kW
1,305 hp
973 kW
Torque
-
2,340 Nm
1,726 lb-ft
Acceleration
2.5 s
3.0 s
Top speed
355 km/h
221 mph
330 km/h
205 mph
Lightness
1,900 kg
4,189 lb
1,854 kg
4,087 lb
Fuel consumption
-
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,146 mm
163.2 in
Height
1,070 mm
42.1 in
Doors/seats
1 doors
1 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,072 mm
199.7 in
Height
1,260 mm
49.6 in
Range score
-
1,067 km
663 mi
Power-to-weight score
644 hp/t
480 kW/t
1.6 kg/hp
704 hp/t
525 kW/t
1.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleTechrules Ren RS 28.4 kWh
Consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.13 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.12 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,969 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Rimac Concept One 90 kWh

  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 25 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest

Techrules Ren RS 28.4 kWh

  • Has 81 hp more
  • Is 46 kg lighter
  • Has 60 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Rimac Concept One 90 kWh
Techrules Ren RS 28.4 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

90 kWh
4.0 V8
VS
RimacConcept One90 kWhvsMcLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8
RS 28.4 kWh
8.0 W16
VS
TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWhvsBugattiDivo8.0 W16
90 kWh
8.0 W16
VS
RimacConcept One90 kWhvsBugattiChiron8.0 W16
90 kWh
6.3 V12
VS
RimacConcept One90 kWhvsFerrariF12tdf6.3 V12
RS 28.4 kWh
4.0 V8
VS
TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWhvsMcLarenSenna4.0 V8
RS 28.4 kWh
8.0 W16
VS
TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWhvsBugattiCentodieci8.0 W16
90 kWh
6.3 V12
VS
RimacConcept One90 kWhvsFerrariLaFerrari6.3 V12
RS 28.4 kWh
70 kWh
VS
TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWhvsLotusTheory 170 kWh
RS 28.4 kWh
3.9 V8
VS
TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWhvsFerrari488 Pista3.9 V8
90 kWh
5.0 V8
VS
RimacConcept One90 kWhvsKoenigseggOne:15.0 V8
90 kWh
6.5 V12
VS
RimacConcept One90 kWhvsLamborghiniAventador LP 750-4 Superveloce6.5 V12
RS 28.4 kWh
3.9 V8
VS
TechrulesRenRS 28.4 kWhvsFerrari488 Pista Spider3.9 V8
Rimac Concept One 90 kWh vs Techrules Ren RS 28.4 kWh - car comparison - FastVsFaster