Rimac Concept One
Car comparison
Rimac Concept One 90 kWhvsTechrules Ren 28.4 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonTechrules Ren
28.4 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Techrules Ren 28.4 kWh
- Most powerful1,305 hp973 kW
- Lightest1,630 kg3,594 lb
- Best power-to-weight801 hp/t597 kW/t1.2 kg/hp
- Best overall score77/100
- Best performance score94/100
- Best economy score87/100
- Best practicality score40/100
Rimac Concept One 90 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.5 s
- Fastest top speed355 km/h221 mph
Specification comparison
| Model | RimacConcept One90 kWh | TechrulesRen28.4 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 1,224hp913kW | 1,305hp973kW |
| Curb weight | 1,900kg4,189lb | 1,630kg3,594lb |
| Top speed | 355 km/h 221 mph | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 33.7s99% target: 351 km/h / 218 mph Calculated | 36.6s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 2.5s | 3.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 6.2s Calculated | 8.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 2.4s Calculated | 2.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 9.4s Calculated | 10.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 644hp/t480kW/t292hp/1000 lb Calculated | 801hp/t597kW/t363hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 1,067km663mi Calculated |
| Length | 4,146mm163in | 4,694mm185in |
| Width | 1,854mm73in | 2,048mm81in |
| Height | 1,070mm42in | 1,200mm47in |
| Wheelbase | 2,563mm101in | 2,724mm107in |
| Front track | - | 1,818mm72in |
| Rear track | - | 1,808mm71in |
| Ground clearance | 115mm5in | - |
| Doors | 2 | 1 |
| Seats | 2 | 3 |
| Fuel tank | - | 80L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | RimacConcept One90 kWh | TechrulesRen28.4 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.4 s | 2.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 2.5 s | 3.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 6.2 s | 8.0 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 17.5 s | - |
| Top speed | 355 km/h 221 mph | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.7 s | 1.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.3 s | 4.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 6.3 s | 6.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 8.0 s | 8.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 9.4 s | 10.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 255 km/h 159 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RimacConcept One90 kWh | 1,224 hp 913 kW |
| TechrulesRen28.4 kWh | 1,305 hp 973 kW |
Techrules Ren 28.4 kWh has 81 hp more than Rimac Concept One 90 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between Rimac Concept One 90 kWh and Techrules Ren 28.4 kWh: 81 hp (60 kW).
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RimacConcept One90 kWh | 1,900 kg 4,189 lb |
| TechrulesRen28.4 kWh | 1,630 kg 3,594 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RimacConcept One90 kWh | 355 km/h 221 mph |
| TechrulesRen28.4 kWh | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RimacConcept One90 kWh | 2.5 s |
| TechrulesRen28.4 kWh | 3.0 s |
Although Techrules Ren 28.4 kWh has more power, Rimac Concept One 90 kWh is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Rimac Concept One 90 kWh and Techrules Ren 28.4 kWh: 0.5 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RimacConcept One90 kWh | 644 hp/t 480 kW/t 1.6 kg/hp |
| TechrulesRen28.4 kWh | 801 hp/t 597 kW/t 1.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RimacConcept One90 kWh | 1,224 hp 913 kW | 2.5 s | 355 km/h 221 mph |
| TechrulesRen28.4 kWh | 1,305 hp 973 kW | 3.0 s | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RimacConcept One90 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| TechrulesRen28.4 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | RimacConcept One90 kWh | TechrulesRen28.4 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 1,224 hp 913 kW | 1,305 hp 973 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 2.5 s | 3.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 355 km/h 221 mph | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,900 kg 4,189 lb | 1,630 kg 3,594 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 1,067 km 663 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 644 hp/t 480 kW/t 1.6 kg/hp | 801 hp/t 597 kW/t 1.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Techrules Ren 28.4 kWh |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,969 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Rimac Concept One 90 kWh
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 40 km/h (25 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Techrules Ren 28.4 kWh
- Has 81 hp more
- Is 270 kg lighter
- Has 156 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























