Renault Talisman Estate · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
Renault Talisman Estate · Facelift 2020 2.0 Blue dCivsVolvo V90 2.0 T4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo V90
2.0 T4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Talisman Estate Facelift 2020 2.0 Blue dCi
- Fastest top speed224 km/h139 mph
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,689 kg3,724 lb
- Best power-to-weight118 hp/t88 kW/t8.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Largest trunk572 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score47/100
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Volvo V90 2.0 T4
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.9 s
- Best estimated range797 km495 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | RenaultTalisman EstateFacelift 20202.0 Blue dCi | VolvoV902.0 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,689kg3,724lb | 1,860kg4,101lb |
| Gross weight | 2,241kg4,941lb | - |
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 85.1s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 86.5s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 9.0s | 8.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 38.6s Calculated | 41.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.6s Calculated | 8.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.5s Calculated | 16.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 118hp/t88kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated | 102hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 237Nm/t158lb-ft/ton Calculated | 161Nm/t108lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 783km487mi Calculated | 797km495mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,865mm192in | 4,936mm194in |
| Width | 1,869mm74in | 1,879mm74in |
| Height | 1,468mm58in | 1,475mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,809mm111in | 2,941mm116in |
| Front track | 1,614mm64in | 1,928mm76in |
| Rear track | 1,609mm63in | 1,629mm64in |
| Ground clearance | - | 153mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 572L | 560L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,526L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 47L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 160g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Renault Talisman Estate Facelift 2020 2.0 Blue dCi: Power / Torque
- Volvo V90 2.0 T4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultTalisman EstateFacelift 20202.0 Blue dCi | 3,500 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 5,000 rpm | 1,620-4,020 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | RenaultTalisman EstateFacelift 20202.0 Blue dCi | VolvoV902.0 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.6 s | 8.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 9.0 s | 8.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 38.6 s | 41.6 s |
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.9 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.4 s | 7.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 11.0 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 14.0 s | 13.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.5 s | 16.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 144 km/h 90 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultTalisman EstateFacelift 20202.0 Blue dCi | 200 hp 149 kW |
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Renault Talisman Estate Facelift 2020 2.0 Blue dCi has 10 hp more than Volvo V90 2.0 T4.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo V90 2.0 T4 and Renault Talisman Estate Facelift 2020 2.0 Blue dCi: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultTalisman EstateFacelift 20202.0 Blue dCi | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultTalisman EstateFacelift 20202.0 Blue dCi | 1,689 kg 3,724 lb |
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 1,860 kg 4,101 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultTalisman EstateFacelift 20202.0 Blue dCi | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultTalisman EstateFacelift 20202.0 Blue dCi | 9.0 s |
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 8.9 s |
Although Renault Talisman Estate Facelift 2020 2.0 Blue dCi has more power, Volvo V90 2.0 T4 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo V90 2.0 T4 and Renault Talisman Estate Facelift 2020 2.0 Blue dCi: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultTalisman EstateFacelift 20202.0 Blue dCi | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Renault Talisman Estate Facelift 2020 2.0 Blue dCi and Volvo V90 2.0 T4: 0.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultTalisman EstateFacelift 20202.0 Blue dCi | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultTalisman EstateFacelift 20202.0 Blue dCi | 783 km 487 mi |
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 797 km 495 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultTalisman EstateFacelift 20202.0 Blue dCi | 200 hp 149 kW | 9.0 s | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.9 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultTalisman EstateFacelift 20202.0 Blue dCi |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoV902.0 T4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultTalisman EstateFacelift 20202.0 Blue dCi |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoV902.0 T4 |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Renault Talisman Estate Facelift 2020 2.0 Blue dCi is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultTalisman EstateFacelift 20202.0 Blue dCi | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 9.0 s |
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultTalisman EstateFacelift 20202.0 Blue dCi | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | RenaultTalisman EstateFacelift 20202.0 Blue dCi | VolvoV902.0 T4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 9.0 s | 8.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,689 kg 3,724 lb | 1,860 kg 4,101 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 783 km 487 mi | 797 km 495 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 160 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 572 L 20.2 cu ft | 560 L 19.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Renault Talisman Estate Facelift 2020 2.0 Blue dCi | Volvo V90 2.0 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.50 LC100 km | 12.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,575 LC/year | 1,811 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Renault Talisman Estate Facelift 2020 2.0 Blue dCi
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 171 kg lighter
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 12 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
Volvo V90 2.0 T4
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 14 km (9 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























