Skoda Octavia III Combi
Car comparison
Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSIvsRenault Megane IV Grandtour GT 1.6 Energy TCe
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Megane IV Grandtour
GT 1.6 Energy TCe
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.8 s
- Fastest top speed247 km/h153 mph
- Most powerful230 hp172 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lightest1,392 kg3,069 lb
- Best power-to-weight165 hp/t123 kW/t6.1 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Largest trunk610 L
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score57/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Renault Megane IV Grandtour GT 1.6 Energy TCe
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions134 g/km
- Best estimated range833 km518 mi
- Best economy score91/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI | RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy TCe |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 230hp172kW | 205hp153kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,392kg3,069lb | 1,392kg3,069lb |
| Gross weight | 1,958kg4,317lb | 1,924kg4,242lb |
| Top speed | 247 km/h 153 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 66.9s99% target: 245 km/h / 152 mph Calculated | 69.0s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.8s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.0s Calculated | 28.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.7s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 165hp/t123kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated | 147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 251Nm/t168lb-ft/ton Calculated | 201Nm/t135lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 806km501mi Calculated | 833km518mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,618cc99cu in |
| Length | 4,685mm184in | 4,626mm182in |
| Width | 1,814mm71in | 1,814mm71in |
| Height | 1,452mm57in | 1,457mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,680mm106in | 2,712mm107in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | 1,591mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,506mm59in | 1,586mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 127mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 610L | 521L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,740L | 1,504L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 142g/km | 134g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Renault Megane IV Grandtour GT 1.6 Energy TCe: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI | 4,700-6,200 rpm | 1,500-4,600 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy TCe | 6,000 rpm | 2,400 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI | RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy TCe |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.8 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.0 s | 28.9 s |
| Top speed | 247 km/h 153 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.7 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 164 km/h 102 mph | 155 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI | 230 hp 172 kW |
| RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy TCe | 205 hp 153 kW |
Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI has 25 hp more than Renault Megane IV Grandtour GT 1.6 Energy TCe.
The biggest power difference is between Renault Megane IV Grandtour GT 1.6 Energy TCe and Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI: 25 hp (19 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy TCe | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI | 1,392 kg 3,069 lb |
| RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy TCe | 1,392 kg 3,069 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI | 247 km/h 153 mph |
| RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy TCe | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI | 6.8 s |
| RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy TCe | 7.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI and Renault Megane IV Grandtour GT 1.6 Energy TCe: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy TCe | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
| RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy TCe | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI | 806 km 501 mi |
| RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy TCe | 833 km 518 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI | 230 hp 172 kW | 6.8 s | 247 km/h 153 mph |
| RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy TCe | 205 hp 153 kW | 7.4 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy TCe |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy TCe |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
| RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy TCe | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy TCe | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI | RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy TCe | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 230 hp 172 kW | 205 hp 153 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.8 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 247 km/h 153 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,392 kg 3,069 lb | 1,392 kg 3,069 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 806 km 501 mi | 833 km 518 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 142 g/km | 134 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 610 L 21.5 cu ft | 521 L 18.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI | Renault Megane IV Grandtour GT 1.6 Energy TCe |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.85 LC100 km | 10.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,628 LC/year | 1,575 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI
- Has 25 hp more
- Has 70 Nm more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 17 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 89 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Renault Megane IV Grandtour GT 1.6 Energy TCe
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 27 km (17 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 8 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























