Car comparison

Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagen Passat Alltrack (B8) 2.0 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Octavia III Combi

RS 2.0 TSI

230 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedWagon / estate2015-2017
VS

Volkswagen Passat Alltrack (B8)

2.0 TSI

220 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedWagon / estate2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    247 km/h
    153 mph
  • Most powerful
    230 hp
    172 kW
  • Highest torque
    350 Nm
    258 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,392 kg
    3,069 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    165 hp/t
    123 kW/t
    6.1 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.2 L/100 km
    37.9 mpg US
    45.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    7.7 L/100 km
    30.5 mpg US
    36.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.3 L/100 km
    44.4 mpg US
    53.3 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    67/100
  • Best performance score
    57/100
  • Best economy score
    90/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSIVolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 TSI
Power
230hp172kW
220hp164kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,392kg3,069lb
1,602kg3,532lb
Gross weight
1,958kg4,317lb
2,270kg5,004lb
Top speed
247 km/h
153 mph
231 km/h
144 mph
To 99% top speed
66.9s99% target: 245 km/h / 152 mph
Calculated
61.6s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.8s
6.8s
0-200 km/h
23.0s
Calculated
25.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.5s
Calculated
6.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.7s
Calculated
14.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
165hp/t123kW/t75hp/1000 lb
Calculated
137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
251Nm/t168lb-ft/ton
Calculated
218Nm/t146lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
806km501mi
Calculated
957km594mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,685mm184in
4,777mm188in
Width
1,814mm71in
1,832mm72in
Height
1,452mm57in
1,506mm59in
Wheelbase
2,680mm106in
2,789mm110in
Front track
1,535mm60in
1,586mm62in
Rear track
1,506mm59in
1,569mm62in
Ground clearance
127mm5in
174mm7in
Trunk volume
610L
639L
Max trunk volume
1,740L
1,769L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
50L
66L
CO2 emissions
142g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSIVolkswagen Passat Alltrack (B8) 2.0 TSIPowerTorque
  • Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Volkswagen Passat Alltrack (B8) 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI4,700-6,200 rpm1,500-4,600 rpm6,450 rpm
VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 TSI4,420-6,250 rpm1,500-4,400 rpm6,500 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSIVolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.5 s
6.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.8 s
6.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
23.0 s
25.7 s
Top speed
247 km/h
153 mph
231 km/h
144 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.8 s
9.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.5 s
12.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.7 s
14.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
164 km/h
102 mph
161 km/h
100 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI
230 hp
172 kW
VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 TSI
220 hp
164 kW

Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI has 10 hp more than Volkswagen Passat Alltrack (B8) 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Passat Alltrack (B8) 2.0 TSI and Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 TSI
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI
1,392 kg
3,069 lb
VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 TSI
1,602 kg
3,532 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI
247 km/h
153 mph
VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 TSI
231 km/h
144 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI6.8 s
VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 TSI6.8 s

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 TSI
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Passat Alltrack (B8) 2.0 TSI: 0.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI
165 hp/t
123 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp
VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 TSI
137 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI
806 km
501 mi
VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 TSI
957 km
594 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI
230 hp
172 kW
6.8 s
247 km/h
153 mph
VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 TSI
220 hp
164 kW
6.8 s
231 km/h
144 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI
Power
230 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
247 km/h
153 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
610 L
21.5 cu ft
Length
4,685 mm
184.4 in
Height
1,452 mm
57.2 in
VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 TSI
Power
220 hp
164 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
231 km/h
144 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
639 L
22.6 cu ft
Length
4,777 mm
188.1 in
Height
1,506 mm
59.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI
Power
230 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
247 km/h
153 mph
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 TSI
Power
220 hp
164 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
231 km/h
144 mph
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK

Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
6.8 s
VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 TSI
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
6.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI
165 hp/t
123 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 TSI
137 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSIVolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 TSI
Power
230 hp
172 kW
220 hp
164 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.8 s
6.8 s
Top speed
247 km/h
153 mph
231 km/h
144 mph
Lightness
1,392 kg
3,069 lb
1,602 kg
3,532 lb
Fuel consumption
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
610 L
21.5 cu ft
Length
4,685 mm
184.4 in
Height
1,452 mm
57.2 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
639 L
22.6 cu ft
Length
4,777 mm
188.1 in
Height
1,506 mm
59.3 in
Range score
806 km
501 mi
957 km
594 mi
CO2 score
142 g/km
-
Trunk score
610 L
21.5 cu ft
639 L
22.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
165 hp/t
123 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp
137 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSkoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSIVolkswagen Passat Alltrack (B8) 2.0 TSI
Consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.85 LC100 km12.08 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi17.46 LC100 mi19.43 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used930 L246 US gal205 UK gal1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,628 LC/year1,811 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Is 210 kg lighter
  • Has 16 km/h (10 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 28 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Smallest trunk

Volkswagen Passat Alltrack (B8) 2.0 TSI

  • Has 150 km (93 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 29 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI
Volkswagen Passat Alltrack (B8) 2.0 TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

RS 2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TSI
RS 2.0 TSI
JCW 2.0
VS
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSIvsMiniClubman (F54)JCW 2.0
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TDI
RS 2.0 TSI
2.0d
VS
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSIvsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TDI
RS 2.0 TSI
2.0 BiTDI
VS
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 BiTDI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B7)2.0 TSI
RS 2.0 TSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSIvsAUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenPassat Variant (B9)2.0 TSI
RS 2.0 TSI
525d
VS
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSIvsBMW5 Series Touring (G31)525d
2.0 TSI
3.2 i V6 24V FSI 4WD
VS
VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenPassat Variant (B6)3.2 i V6 24V FSI 4WD
RS 2.0 TSI
CLS 350d V6
VS
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSIvsMercedes-BenzCLS Shooting Brake (X218)Facelift 2014CLS 350d V6
Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI vs Volkswagen Passat Alltrack (B8) 2.0 TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster