Skoda Octavia III Combi
Car comparison
Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagen Passat Variant (B8) 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Passat Variant (B8)
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.8 s
- Fastest top speed247 km/h153 mph
- Most powerful230 hp172 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lightest1,392 kg3,069 lb
- Best power-to-weight165 hp/t123 kW/t6.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Best performance score57/100
- Best economy score90/100
Volkswagen Passat Variant (B8) 2.0 TSI
- Best estimated range1,048 km651 mi
- Largest trunk650 L
- Best overall score68/100
- Best practicality score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI | VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 230hp172kW | 220hp164kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,392kg3,069lb | 1,475kg3,252lb |
| Gross weight | 1,958kg4,317lb | 2,130kg4,696lb |
| Top speed | 247 km/h 153 mph | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 66.9s99% target: 245 km/h / 152 mph Calculated | 65.2s99% target: 242 km/h / 150 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.8s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.0s Calculated | 23.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 6.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.7s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 165hp/t123kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated | 149hp/t111kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 251Nm/t168lb-ft/ton Calculated | 237Nm/t159lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 806km501mi Calculated | 1,048km651mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,685mm184in | 4,767mm188in |
| Width | 1,814mm71in | 1,832mm72in |
| Height | 1,452mm57in | 1,477mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,680mm106in | 2,791mm110in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | 1,584mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,506mm59in | 1,568mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 127mm5in | 145mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 610L | 650L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,740L | 1,780L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | 142g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Passat Variant (B8) 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI | 4,700-6,200 rpm | 1,500-4,600 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TSI | 4,500-6,200 rpm | 1,500-4,400 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI | VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 6.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.8 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.0 s | 23.4 s |
| Top speed | 247 km/h 153 mph | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.7 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 164 km/h 102 mph | 163 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI | 230 hp 172 kW |
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TSI | 220 hp 164 kW |
Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI has 10 hp more than Volkswagen Passat Variant (B8) 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Passat Variant (B8) 2.0 TSI and Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI | 1,392 kg 3,069 lb |
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TSI | 1,475 kg 3,252 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI | 247 km/h 153 mph |
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TSI | 244 km/h 152 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI | 6.8 s |
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TSI | 6.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Passat Variant (B8) 2.0 TSI: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TSI | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TSI | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI | 806 km 501 mi |
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TSI | 1,048 km 651 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI | 230 hp 172 kW | 6.8 s | 247 km/h 153 mph |
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TSI | 220 hp 164 kW | 6.9 s | 244 km/h 152 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TSI |
| 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TSI | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TSI | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI | VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 230 hp 172 kW | 220 hp 164 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.8 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 247 km/h 153 mph | 244 km/h 152 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,392 kg 3,069 lb | 1,475 kg 3,252 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 806 km 501 mi | 1,048 km 651 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 142 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 610 L 21.5 cu ft | 650 L 23.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI | Volkswagen Passat Variant (B8) 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK | 6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.85 LC100 km | 11.03 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi | 17.74 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal | 945 L250 US gal208 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,628 LC/year | 1,654 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 83 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen Passat Variant (B8) 2.0 TSI
- Has 241 km (150 mi) more estimated range
- Has 40 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























