Volvo V90
Car comparison
Volvo V90 2.0 T4vsRenault Megane IV Grandtour 1.3 TCe
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Megane IV Grandtour
1.3 TCe
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Megane IV Grandtour 1.3 TCe
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.8 s
- Lightest1,444 kg3,183 lb
- Best power-to-weight111 hp/t83 kW/t9.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range862 km536 mi
- Best economy score91/100
Volvo V90 2.0 T4
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Largest trunk560 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score44/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoV902.0 T4 | RenaultMegane IV Grandtour1.3 TCe |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 160hp119kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 270Nm199lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,860kg4,101lb | 1,444kg3,183lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,906kg4,202lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 86.5s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 77.5s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.9s | 8.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 41.6s Calculated | 46.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.4s Calculated | 8.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.5s Calculated | 16.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 102hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated | 111hp/t83kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 161Nm/t108lb-ft/ton Calculated | 187Nm/t125lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 797km495mi Calculated | 862km536mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,333cc81cu in |
| Length | 4,936mm194in | 4,626mm182in |
| Width | 1,879mm74in | 1,814mm71in |
| Height | 1,475mm58in | 1,449mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,941mm116in | 2,712mm107in |
| Front track | 1,928mm76in | 1,591mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,629mm64in | 1,586mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 153mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 560L | 507L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,526L | 1,504L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 160g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo V90 2.0 T4: Power / Torque
- Renault Megane IV Grandtour 1.3 TCe: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 5,000 rpm | 1,620-4,020 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| RenaultMegane IV Grandtour1.3 TCe | 5,500 rpm | 1,800 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoV902.0 T4 | RenaultMegane IV Grandtour1.3 TCe |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.4 s | 8.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.9 s | 8.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 41.6 s | 46.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.3 s | 7.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.8 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.9 s | 13.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.5 s | 16.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 143 km/h 89 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
| RenaultMegane IV Grandtour1.3 TCe | 160 hp 119 kW |
Volvo V90 2.0 T4 has 30 hp more than Renault Megane IV Grandtour 1.3 TCe.
The biggest power difference is between Renault Megane IV Grandtour 1.3 TCe and Volvo V90 2.0 T4: 30 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| RenaultMegane IV Grandtour1.3 TCe | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 1,860 kg 4,101 lb |
| RenaultMegane IV Grandtour1.3 TCe | 1,444 kg 3,183 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| RenaultMegane IV Grandtour1.3 TCe | 212 km/h 132 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 8.9 s |
| RenaultMegane IV Grandtour1.3 TCe | 8.8 s |
Although Volvo V90 2.0 T4 has more power, Renault Megane IV Grandtour 1.3 TCe is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Megane IV Grandtour 1.3 TCe and Volvo V90 2.0 T4: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| RenaultMegane IV Grandtour1.3 TCe | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Renault Megane IV Grandtour 1.3 TCe and Volvo V90 2.0 T4: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp |
| RenaultMegane IV Grandtour1.3 TCe | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 797 km 495 mi |
| RenaultMegane IV Grandtour1.3 TCe | 862 km 536 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.9 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| RenaultMegane IV Grandtour1.3 TCe | 160 hp 119 kW | 8.8 s | 212 km/h 132 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 T4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultMegane IV Grandtour1.3 TCe |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 T4 |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| RenaultMegane IV Grandtour1.3 TCe |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo V90 2.0 T4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
| RenaultMegane IV Grandtour1.3 TCe | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 8.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| RenaultMegane IV Grandtour1.3 TCe | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoV902.0 T4 | RenaultMegane IV Grandtour1.3 TCe | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 160 hp 119 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.9 s | 8.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,860 kg 4,101 lb | 1,444 kg 3,183 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 797 km 495 mi | 862 km 536 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 160 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 560 L 19.8 cu ft | 507 L 17.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo V90 2.0 T4 | Renault Megane IV Grandtour 1.3 TCe |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.08 LC100 km | 10.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,811 LC/year | 1,523 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo V90 2.0 T4
- Has 30 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Has 53 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Renault Megane IV Grandtour 1.3 TCe
- Is 416 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 65 km (40 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























