Renault Laguna III Grandtour
Car comparison
Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP · Stage 3vsRenault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP · Stage 2vsRenault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP · Stage 1vsRenault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Laguna III Grandtour
2.0 dCi FAP (Stage 2)
Renault Laguna III Grandtour
2.0 dCi FAP (Stage 1)
Renault Laguna III Grandtour
2.0 dCi FAP
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP (Stage 3) 276 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.6 s
- Fastest top speed251 km/h156 mph
- Most powerful276 hp206 kW
- Highest torque608 Nm448 lb-ft
- Lightest1,613 kg3,556 lb
- Best power-to-weight171 hp/t128 kW/t5.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range985 km612 mi
- Largest trunk508 L
- Best overall score71/100
- Best performance score65/100
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Specification comparison
| Model | RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP (Stage 3)276 hp | RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP (Stage 2)240 hp | RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP (Stage 1)214 hp | RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP178 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 276hp206kW+98 hp | 240hp179kW+62 hp | 214hp159kW+36 hp | 178hp133kW |
| Torque | 608Nm448lb-ft+228 Nm | 532Nm392lb-ft+152 Nm | 475Nm350lb-ft+95 Nm | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,613kg3,556lb | 1,613kg3,556lb | 1,613kg3,556lb | 1,613kg3,556lb |
| Gross weight | 2,055kg4,530lb | 2,055kg4,530lb | 2,055kg4,530lb | 2,055kg4,530lb |
| Top speed | 251 km/h 156 mph | 242 km/h 150 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph | 213 km/h 132 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 67.1s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph-10.2 s Calculated | 72.4s99% target: 240 km/h / 149 mph-4.9 s Calculated | 75.9s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph-1.4 s Calculated | 77.3s99% target: 211 km/h / 131 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.6s-2.1 s | 7.2s-1.5 s | 7.8s-0.9 s | 8.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.0s-22.6 s Calculated | 25.8s-18.9 s Calculated | 30.0s-14.6 s Calculated | 44.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.3s-1.9 s Calculated | 6.9s-1.4 s Calculated | 7.4s-0.9 s Calculated | 8.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s-1.8 s Calculated | 15.1s-1.2 s Calculated | 15.6s-0.8 s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 171hp/t128kW/t78hp/1000 lb Calculated | 149hp/t111kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated | 132hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated | 110hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 377Nm/t252lb-ft/ton Calculated | 330Nm/t221lb-ft/ton Calculated | 294Nm/t197lb-ft/ton Calculated | 236Nm/t158lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 985km612mi Calculated | 985km612mi Calculated | 985km612mi Calculated | 985km612mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,803mm189in | 4,803mm189in | 4,803mm189in | 4,803mm189in |
| Width | 1,811mm71in | 1,811mm71in | 1,811mm71in | 1,811mm71in |
| Height | 1,445mm57in | 1,445mm57in | 1,445mm57in | 1,445mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,756mm109in | 2,756mm109in | 2,756mm109in | 2,756mm109in |
| Trunk volume | 508L | 508L | 508L | 508L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 66L | 66L | 66L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP (Stage 3) 276 hp: Power / Torque
- Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP (Stage 2) 240 hp: Power / Torque
- Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP (Stage 1) 214 hp: Power / Torque
- Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP 178 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP (Stage 3)276 hp | 3,750 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 4,000 rpm |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP (Stage 2)240 hp | 3,750 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 4,000 rpm |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP (Stage 1)214 hp | 3,750 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 4,000 rpm |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP178 hp | 3,750 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 4,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP (Stage 3)276 hp | RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP (Stage 2)240 hp | RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP (Stage 1)214 hp | RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP178 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.3 s | 6.9 s | 7.4 s | 8.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.6 s | 7.2 s | 7.8 s | 8.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.0 s | 25.8 s | 30.0 s | 44.6 s |
| Top speed | 251 km/h 156 mph | 242 km/h 150 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph | 213 km/h 132 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s | 2.7 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.8 s | 7.0 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 10.0 s | 10.3 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.8 s | 13.2 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 15.1 s | 15.6 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 165 km/h 103 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph | 153 km/h 95 mph | 144 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP (Stage 3)276 hp | 276 hp 206 kW |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP (Stage 2)240 hp | 240 hp 179 kW |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP (Stage 1)214 hp | 214 hp 159 kW |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP178 hp | 178 hp 133 kW |
Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP (Stage 3) 276 hp has 98 hp more than Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP 178 hp.
The biggest power difference is between Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP 178 hp and Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP (Stage 3) 276 hp: 98 hp (73 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP (Stage 3)276 hp | 608 Nm 448 lb-ft |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP (Stage 2)240 hp | 532 Nm 392 lb-ft |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP (Stage 1)214 hp | 475 Nm 350 lb-ft |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP178 hp | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP (Stage 3)276 hp | 1,613 kg 3,556 lb |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP (Stage 2)240 hp | 1,613 kg 3,556 lb |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP (Stage 1)214 hp | 1,613 kg 3,556 lb |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP178 hp | 1,613 kg 3,556 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP (Stage 3)276 hp | 251 km/h 156 mph |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP (Stage 2)240 hp | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP (Stage 1)214 hp | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP178 hp | 213 km/h 132 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP (Stage 3) 276 hp and Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP 178 hp: 2.1 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP (Stage 2) 240 hp and Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP (Stage 1) 214 hp, separated by only 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP (Stage 3)276 hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP (Stage 2)240 hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP (Stage 1)214 hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP178 hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP (Stage 3)276 hp | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP (Stage 2)240 hp | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP (Stage 1)214 hp | 132 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP178 hp | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP (Stage 3)276 hp | 985 km 612 mi |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP (Stage 2)240 hp | 985 km 612 mi |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP (Stage 1)214 hp | 985 km 612 mi |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP178 hp | 985 km 612 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP (Stage 3)276 hp | 276 hp 206 kW | 6.6 s | 251 km/h 156 mph |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP (Stage 2)240 hp | 240 hp 179 kW | 7.2 s | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP (Stage 1)214 hp | 214 hp 159 kW | 7.8 s | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP178 hp | 178 hp 133 kW | 8.7 s | 213 km/h 132 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP (Stage 3)276 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP (Stage 2)240 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP (Stage 1)214 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP178 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP (Stage 3)276 hp |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP (Stage 2)240 hp |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP (Stage 1)214 hp |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP178 hp |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP (Stage 3) 276 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP (Stage 3)276 hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP (Stage 2)240 hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP (Stage 1)214 hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP178 hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 8.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP (Stage 3)276 hp | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP (Stage 2)240 hp | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP (Stage 1)214 hp | 132 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP178 hp | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP (Stage 3)276 hp | RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP (Stage 2)240 hp | RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP (Stage 1)214 hp | RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP178 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 276 hp 206 kW | 240 hp 179 kW | 214 hp 159 kW | 178 hp 133 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 608 Nm 448 lb-ft | 532 Nm 392 lb-ft | 475 Nm 350 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.6 s | 7.2 s | 7.8 s | 8.7 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 251 km/h 156 mph | 242 km/h 150 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph | 213 km/h 132 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,613 kg 3,556 lb | 1,613 kg 3,556 lb | 1,613 kg 3,556 lb | 1,613 kg 3,556 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 985 km 612 mi | 985 km 612 mi | 985 km 612 mi | 985 km 612 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 508 L 17.9 cu ft | 508 L 17.9 cu ft | 508 L 17.9 cu ft | 508 L 17.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 132 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP (Stage 3) 276 hp | Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP (Stage 2) 240 hp | Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP (Stage 1) 214 hp | Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP 178 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.73 LC100 km | 11.73 LC100 km | 11.73 LC100 km | 11.73 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,759 LC/year | 1,759 LC/year | 1,759 LC/year | 1,759 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP (Stage 3) 276 hp
- Has 36 hp more
- Has 76 Nm more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 22 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP (Stage 2) 240 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























