Renault Laguna II Grandtour
Car comparison
Renault Laguna II Grandtour 3.0 V6 24VvsRenault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Laguna III
2.0 dCi FAP
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Laguna II Grandtour 3.0 V6 24V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.3 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Most powerful207 hp154 kW
- Lightest1,545 kg3,406 lb
- Best power-to-weight134 hp/t100 kW/t7.5 kg/hp
- Largest trunk475 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score48/100
- Best practicality score83/100
Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,015 km631 mi
- Best economy score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | RenaultLaguna II Grandtour3.0 V6 24V | RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 207hp154kW | 173hp129kW |
| Torque | 285Nm210lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,545kg3,406lb | 1,567kg3,455lb |
| Gross weight | 2,020kg4,453lb | 2,042kg4,502lb |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 81.3s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 98.2s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.3s | 8.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.4s Calculated | 45.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.9s Calculated | 8.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.1L/100 km15.6mpg US18.7mpg UK | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.0s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated | 110hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 184Nm/t123lb-ft/ton Calculated | 243Nm/t162lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 680km422mi Calculated | 1,015km631mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,946cc180cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,695mm185in | 4,695mm185in |
| Width | 1,772mm70in | 1,811mm71in |
| Height | 1,443mm57in | 1,445mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,740mm108in | 2,756mm109in |
| Front track | 1,525mm60in | - |
| Rear track | 1,480mm58in | - |
| Trunk volume | 475L | 470L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,500L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 66L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Renault Laguna II Grandtour 3.0 V6 24V: Power / Torque
- Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour3.0 V6 24V | 6,000 rpm | 3,750 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 3,750 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 4,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | RenaultLaguna II Grandtour3.0 V6 24V | RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.9 s | 8.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.3 s | 8.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.4 s | 45.0 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.0 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 141 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour3.0 V6 24V | 207 hp 154 kW |
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 173 hp 129 kW |
Renault Laguna II Grandtour 3.0 V6 24V has 34 hp more than Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP.
The biggest power difference is between Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP and Renault Laguna II Grandtour 3.0 V6 24V: 34 hp (25 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour3.0 V6 24V | 285 Nm 210 lb-ft |
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour3.0 V6 24V | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb |
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 1,567 kg 3,455 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour3.0 V6 24V | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour3.0 V6 24V | 8.3 s |
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 8.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Laguna II Grandtour 3.0 V6 24V and Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour3.0 V6 24V | 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK |
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP and Renault Laguna II Grandtour 3.0 V6 24V: 3.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour3.0 V6 24V | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour3.0 V6 24V | 680 km 422 mi |
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 1,015 km 631 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour3.0 V6 24V | 207 hp 154 kW | 8.3 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 173 hp 129 kW | 8.7 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour3.0 V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour3.0 V6 24V |
| 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP |
| 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour3.0 V6 24V | 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 8.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour3.0 V6 24V | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK |
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | RenaultLaguna II Grandtour3.0 V6 24V | RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 207 hp 154 kW | 173 hp 129 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 285 Nm 210 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.3 s | 8.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb | 1,567 kg 3,455 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 680 km 422 mi | 1,015 km 631 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 475 L 16.8 cu ft | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Renault Laguna II Grandtour 3.0 V6 24V | Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.3 L/100 km22.8 mpg US27.4 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.03 LC100 km | 11.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 29.01 LC100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,545 L408 US gal340 UK gal | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,704 LC/year | 1,706 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Renault Laguna II Grandtour 3.0 V6 24V
- Has 34 hp more
- Is 22 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 24 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 5 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP
- Has 95 Nm more
- Uses 3.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 336 km (209 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























