Renault Megane III Coupe
Car comparison
Renault Megane III Coupe RS Trophy 2.0 16VvsRenault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Laguna Coupe
3.5 V6 24V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Megane III Coupe RS Trophy 2.0 16V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.0 s
- Fastest top speed254 km/h158 mph
- Most powerful265 hp198 kW
- Highest torque360 Nm266 lb-ft
- Lightest1,387 kg3,058 lb
- Best power-to-weight191 hp/t142 kW/t5.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.3 L/100 km20.8 mpg US25.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range732 km455 mi
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score61/100
- Best economy score85/100
- Best practicality score58/100
Renault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24V
- Largest trunk423 L
Specification comparison
| Model | RenaultMegane III CoupeRS Trophy 2.0 16V | RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265hp198kW | 238hp177kW |
| Torque | 360Nm266lb-ft | 330Nm243lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,387kg3,058lb | 1,597kg3,521lb |
| Gross weight | 1,835kg4,045lb | 1,953kg4,306lb |
| Top speed | 254 km/h 158 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.0s99% target: 251 km/h / 156 mph Calculated | 97.7s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.0s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.4s Calculated | 29.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.7s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK | 15L/100 km15.7mpg US18.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.1s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 191hp/t142kW/t87hp/1000 lb Calculated | 149hp/t111kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 260Nm/t174lb-ft/ton Calculated | 207Nm/t138lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 732km455mi Calculated | 647km402mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 3,498cc213cu in |
| Length | 4,299mm169in | 4,643mm183in |
| Width | - | 1,811mm71in |
| Height | 1,435mm56in | 1,400mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,636mm104in | 2,690mm106in |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | - |
| Rear track | 1,545mm61in | - |
| Ground clearance | 120mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 377L | 423L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,024L | - |
| Doors | 3 | 2 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | 190g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Renault Megane III Coupe RS Trophy 2.0 16V: Power / Torque
- Renault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS Trophy 2.0 16V | 5,500 rpm | 3,000-5,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 6,000 rpm | 4,400 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | RenaultMegane III CoupeRS Trophy 2.0 16V | RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.7 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.0 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.4 s | 29.8 s |
| Top speed | 254 km/h 158 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.9 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.1 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 164 km/h 102 mph | 152 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS Trophy 2.0 16V | 265 hp 198 kW |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 238 hp 177 kW |
Renault Megane III Coupe RS Trophy 2.0 16V has 27 hp more than Renault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24V.
The biggest power difference is between Renault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24V and Renault Megane III Coupe RS Trophy 2.0 16V: 27 hp (20 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS Trophy 2.0 16V | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS Trophy 2.0 16V | 1,387 kg 3,058 lb |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 1,597 kg 3,521 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS Trophy 2.0 16V | 254 km/h 158 mph |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 245 km/h 152 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS Trophy 2.0 16V | 6.0 s |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 7.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Megane III Coupe RS Trophy 2.0 16V and Renault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24V: 1.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS Trophy 2.0 16V | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Renault Megane III Coupe RS Trophy 2.0 16V and Renault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24V: 2.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS Trophy 2.0 16V | 191 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS Trophy 2.0 16V | 732 km 455 mi |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 647 km 402 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS Trophy 2.0 16V | 265 hp 198 kW | 6.0 s | 254 km/h 158 mph |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 238 hp 177 kW | 7.4 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS Trophy 2.0 16V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS Trophy 2.0 16V |
| 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V |
| 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Renault Megane III Coupe RS Trophy 2.0 16V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS Trophy 2.0 16V | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 6.0 s |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS Trophy 2.0 16V | 191 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | RenaultMegane III CoupeRS Trophy 2.0 16V | RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp 198 kW | 238 hp 177 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.0 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 254 km/h 158 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,387 kg 3,058 lb | 1,597 kg 3,521 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 732 km 455 mi | 647 km 402 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 190 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 377 L 13.3 cu ft | 423 L 14.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 191 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Renault Megane III Coupe RS Trophy 2.0 16V | Renault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK | 10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.35 LC100 km | 17.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.09 LC100 mi | 28.73 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal | 1,530 L404 US gal337 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,153 LC/year | 2,678 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Renault Megane III Coupe RS Trophy 2.0 16V
- Has 27 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 210 kg lighter
- Is 1.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 42 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 85 km (53 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Renault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24V
- Has 46 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























