Renault Laguna Coupe
Car comparison
Renault Laguna Coupe 3.0 dCi V6 FAPvsRenault Megane III CC GT 2.0 TCe
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Megane III CC
GT 2.0 TCe
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Laguna Coupe 3.0 dCi V6 FAP
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Most powerful235 hp175 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight138 hp/t103 kW/t7.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range880 km547 mi
- Largest trunk423 L
- Best overall score55/100
- Best performance score57/100
- Best economy score87/100
- Best practicality score52/100
Renault Megane III CC GT 2.0 TCe
- Lightest1,540 kg3,395 lb
Specification comparison
| Model | RenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP | RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 235hp175kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,705kg3,759lb | 1,540kg3,395lb |
| Gross weight | 2,050kg4,519lb | 1,926kg4,246lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 102.2s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 109.4s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.0s Calculated | 43.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 8.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 138hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated | 117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 264Nm/t177lb-ft/ton Calculated | 195Nm/t130lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 880km547mi Calculated | 741km460mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,993cc183cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,643mm183in | 4,485mm177in |
| Width | 1,811mm71in | 1,811mm71in |
| Height | 1,400mm55in | 1,434mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,690mm106in | 2,609mm103in |
| Front track | - | 1,546mm61in |
| Rear track | - | 1,547mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 120mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 423L | 211L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 417L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 188g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Renault Laguna Coupe 3.0 dCi V6 FAP: Power / Torque
- Renault Megane III CC GT 2.0 TCe: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP | 4,400 rpm | 1,800 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
| RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe | 5,500 rpm | 2,250 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | RenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP | RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 8.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.0 s | 43.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 16.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 153 km/h 95 mph | 141 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP | 235 hp 175 kW |
| RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe | 180 hp 134 kW |
Renault Laguna Coupe 3.0 dCi V6 FAP has 55 hp more than Renault Megane III CC GT 2.0 TCe.
The biggest power difference is between Renault Megane III CC GT 2.0 TCe and Renault Laguna Coupe 3.0 dCi V6 FAP: 55 hp (41 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP | 1,705 kg 3,759 lb |
| RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe | 225 km/h 140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP | 7.3 s |
| RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe | 8.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Laguna Coupe 3.0 dCi V6 FAP and Renault Megane III CC GT 2.0 TCe: 1.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Renault Laguna Coupe 3.0 dCi V6 FAP and Renault Megane III CC GT 2.0 TCe: 0.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
| RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP | 880 km 547 mi |
| RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe | 741 km 460 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP | 235 hp 175 kW | 7.3 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.5 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe |
| 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Renault Laguna Coupe 3.0 dCi V6 FAP is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
| RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | RenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP | RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 235 hp 175 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,705 kg 3,759 lb | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 880 km 547 mi | 741 km 460 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 188 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 423 L 14.9 cu ft | 211 L 7.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Renault Laguna Coupe 3.0 dCi V6 FAP | Renault Megane III CC GT 2.0 TCe |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK | 8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.13 LC100 km | 14.17 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi | 22.81 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal | 1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,969 LC/year | 2,126 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Renault Laguna Coupe 3.0 dCi V6 FAP
- Has 55 hp more
- Has 150 Nm more
- Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 25 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 21 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 139 km (87 mi) more estimated range
- Has 212 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Renault Megane III CC GT 2.0 TCe
- Is 165 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























