Renault Laguna Coupe
Car comparison
Renault Laguna Coupe 3.0 dCi V6 FAPvsRenault Laguna II Grandtour 2.0 i 16V Turbo
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Laguna II Grandtour
2.0 i 16V Turbo
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Laguna Coupe 3.0 dCi V6 FAP
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Most powerful235 hp175 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight138 hp/t103 kW/t7.3 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Best performance score57/100
- Best economy score87/100
Renault Laguna II Grandtour 2.0 i 16V Turbo
- Lightest1,355 kg2,987 lb
- Largest trunk475 L
- Best overall score57/100
- Best practicality score83/100
Specification comparison
| Model | RenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP | RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 235hp175kW | 170hp127kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 270Nm199lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,705kg3,759lb | 1,355kg2,987lb |
| Gross weight | 2,050kg4,519lb | 1,985kg4,376lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 102.2s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 76.6s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 8.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.0s Calculated | 37.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 8.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK | 11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 138hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated | 125hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 264Nm/t177lb-ft/ton Calculated | 199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 880km547mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,993cc183cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,643mm183in | 4,695mm185in |
| Width | 1,811mm71in | 1,772mm70in |
| Height | 1,400mm55in | 1,443mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,690mm106in | 2,740mm108in |
| Front track | - | 1,525mm60in |
| Rear track | - | 1,480mm58in |
| Trunk volume | 423L | 475L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,500L |
| Doors | 2 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Renault Laguna Coupe 3.0 dCi V6 FAP: Power / Torque
- Renault Laguna II Grandtour 2.0 i 16V Turbo: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP | 4,400 rpm | 1,800 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V Turbo | 5,000 rpm | 3,250 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | RenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP | RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 8.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 8.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.0 s | 37.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 7.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 153 km/h 95 mph | 146 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP | 235 hp 175 kW |
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V Turbo | 170 hp 127 kW |
Renault Laguna Coupe 3.0 dCi V6 FAP has 65 hp more than Renault Laguna II Grandtour 2.0 i 16V Turbo.
The biggest power difference is between Renault Laguna II Grandtour 2.0 i 16V Turbo and Renault Laguna Coupe 3.0 dCi V6 FAP: 65 hp (48 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V Turbo | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP | 1,705 kg 3,759 lb |
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V Turbo | 1,355 kg 2,987 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V Turbo | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP | 7.3 s |
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V Turbo | 8.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Laguna Coupe 3.0 dCi V6 FAP and Renault Laguna II Grandtour 2.0 i 16V Turbo: 1.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V Turbo | 125 hp/t 94 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP | 235 hp 175 kW | 7.3 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V Turbo | 170 hp 127 kW | 8.6 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | RenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP | RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V Turbo | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 235 hp 175 kW | 170 hp 127 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 8.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,705 kg 3,759 lb | 1,355 kg 2,987 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 880 km 547 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 423 L 14.9 cu ft | 475 L 16.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 125 hp/t 94 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Renault Laguna Coupe 3.0 dCi V6 FAP |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,969 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Renault Laguna Coupe 3.0 dCi V6 FAP
- Has 65 hp more
- Has 180 Nm more
- Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 30 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Renault Laguna II Grandtour 2.0 i 16V Turbo
- Is 350 kg lighter
- Has 52 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























