Renault Megane III Grandtour
Car comparison
Renault Megane III Grandtour GT 2.0 TCevsRenault Laguna II Grandtour 2.0 i 16V Turbo
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Laguna II Grandtour
2.0 i 16V Turbo
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Megane III Grandtour GT 2.0 TCe
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.0 s
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph
- Most powerful180 hp134 kW
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight129 hp/t96 kW/t7.7 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Largest trunk524 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score48/100
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Renault Laguna II Grandtour 2.0 i 16V Turbo
- Lightest1,355 kg2,987 lb
Specification comparison
| Model | RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe | RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 180hp134kW | 170hp127kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 270Nm199lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,391kg3,067lb | 1,355kg2,987lb |
| Gross weight | 1,884kg4,154lb | 1,985kg4,376lb |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 73.9s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 76.6s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.0s | 8.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 33.2s Calculated | 37.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.6s Calculated | 8.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK | 11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.8s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 129hp/t96kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated | 125hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 216Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated | 199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 779km484mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,559mm179in | 4,695mm185in |
| Width | 1,766mm70in | 1,772mm70in |
| Height | 1,461mm58in | 1,443mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,703mm106in | 2,740mm108in |
| Front track | 1,546mm61in | 1,525mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,547mm61in | 1,480mm58in |
| Ground clearance | 120mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 524L | 475L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,595L | 1,500L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 178g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Renault Megane III Grandtour GT 2.0 TCe: Power / Torque
- Renault Laguna II Grandtour 2.0 i 16V Turbo: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe | 5,500 rpm | 2,250 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V Turbo | 5,000 rpm | 3,250 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe | RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.6 s | 8.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.0 s | 8.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 33.2 s | 37.9 s |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.4 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.8 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 146 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe | 180 hp 134 kW |
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V Turbo | 170 hp 127 kW |
Renault Megane III Grandtour GT 2.0 TCe has 10 hp more than Renault Laguna II Grandtour 2.0 i 16V Turbo.
The biggest power difference is between Renault Laguna II Grandtour 2.0 i 16V Turbo and Renault Megane III Grandtour GT 2.0 TCe: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V Turbo | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe | 1,391 kg 3,067 lb |
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V Turbo | 1,355 kg 2,987 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V Turbo | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe | 8.0 s |
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V Turbo | 8.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Megane III Grandtour GT 2.0 TCe and Renault Laguna II Grandtour 2.0 i 16V Turbo: 0.6 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V Turbo | 125 hp/t 94 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.0 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V Turbo | 170 hp 127 kW | 8.6 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe | RenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V Turbo | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 180 hp 134 kW | 170 hp 127 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.0 s | 8.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,391 kg 3,067 lb | 1,355 kg 2,987 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 779 km 484 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 178 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 524 L 18.5 cu ft | 475 L 16.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 125 hp/t 94 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Renault Megane III Grandtour GT 2.0 TCe |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.48 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,021 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Renault Megane III Grandtour GT 2.0 TCe
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 49 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Renault Laguna II Grandtour 2.0 i 16V Turbo
- Is 36 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























