Car comparison

Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V TurbovsVolvo C30 2.4 i 20V

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Renault Laguna Coupe

2.0 16V Turbo

205 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedCoupe2008-2012
VS

Volvo C30

2.4 i 20V

170 hp2435 ccGasolineFWDManualNaturally aspiratedCoupe2006-2010

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    236 km/h
    147 mph
  • Most powerful
    205 hp
    153 kW
  • Highest torque
    300 Nm
    221 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    136 hp/t
    102 kW/t
    7.3 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.0 L/100 km
    29.4 mpg US
    35.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    10.8 L/100 km
    21.8 mpg US
    26.2 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    825 km
    513 mi
  • Largest trunk
    423 L
  • Best overall score
    51/100
  • Best performance score
    51/100
  • Best economy score
    85/100
  • Best practicality score
    52/100

Volvo C30 2.4 i 20V

  • Lightest
    1,429 kg
    3,150 lb
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.3 L/100 km
    37.3 mpg US
    44.8 mpg UK

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelRenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V TurboVolvoC302.4 i 20V
Power
205hp153kW
170hp127kW
Torque
300Nm221lb-ft
230Nm170lb-ft
Curb weight
1,503kg3,314lb
1,429kg3,150lb
Gross weight
1,923kg4,239lb
1,840kg4,057lb
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
To 99% top speed
97.2s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
94.4s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.8s
8.1s
0-200 km/h
33.5s
Calculated
42.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.4s
Calculated
7.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK
12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.6s
Calculated
15.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
136hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb
Calculated
119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
200Nm/t134lb-ft/ton
Calculated
161Nm/t108lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
825km513mi
Calculated
738km459mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
2,435cc149cu in
Length
4,643mm183in
4,252mm167in
Width
1,811mm71in
1,782mm70in
Height
1,400mm55in
1,447mm57in
Wheelbase
2,690mm106in
2,640mm104in
Front track-
1,548mm61in
Rear track-
1,544mm61in
Trunk volume
423L
233L
Doors
2
3
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
66L
62L
CO2 emissions-
200g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V TurboVolvo C30 2.4 i 20VPowerTorque
  • Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo: Power / Torque
  • Volvo C30 2.4 i 20V: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo5,000 rpm3,000 rpm5,250 rpm
VolvoC302.4 i 20V6,000 rpm4,400 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricRenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V TurboVolvoC302.4 i 20V
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.4 s
7.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.8 s
8.1 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
33.5 s
42.9 s
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
10.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.2 s
13.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.6 s
15.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
148 km/h
92 mph
144 km/h
89 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
205 hp
153 kW
VolvoC302.4 i 20V
170 hp
127 kW

Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo has 35 hp more than Volvo C30 2.4 i 20V.

The biggest power difference is between Volvo C30 2.4 i 20V and Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo: 35 hp (26 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
VolvoC302.4 i 20V
230 Nm
170 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
1,503 kg
3,314 lb
VolvoC302.4 i 20V
1,429 kg
3,150 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
236 km/h
147 mph
VolvoC302.4 i 20V
220 km/h
137 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo7.8 s
VolvoC302.4 i 20V8.1 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo and Volvo C30 2.4 i 20V: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
VolvoC302.4 i 20V
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
136 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
VolvoC302.4 i 20V
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
825 km
513 mi
VolvoC302.4 i 20V
738 km
459 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
205 hp
153 kW
7.8 s
236 km/h
147 mph
VolvoC302.4 i 20V
170 hp
127 kW
8.1 s
220 km/h
137 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
Power
205 hp
153 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
423 L
14.9 cu ft
Length
4,643 mm
182.8 in
Height
1,400 mm
55.1 in
VolvoC302.4 i 20V
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h8.1 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
233 L
8.2 cu ft
Length
4,252 mm
167.4 in
Height
1,447 mm
57.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
Power
205 hp
153 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
VolvoC302.4 i 20V
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h8.1 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
7.8 s
VolvoC302.4 i 20V
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
8.1 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
136 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
VolvoC302.4 i 20V
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleRenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V TurboVolvoC302.4 i 20V
Power
205 hp
153 kW
170 hp
127 kW
Torque
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
230 Nm
170 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.8 s
8.1 s
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
Lightness
1,503 kg
3,314 lb
1,429 kg
3,150 lb
Fuel consumption
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
423 L
14.9 cu ft
Length
4,643 mm
182.8 in
Height
1,400 mm
55.1 in
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
233 L
8.2 cu ft
Length
4,252 mm
167.4 in
Height
1,447 mm
57.0 in
Range score
825 km
513 mi
738 km
459 mi
CO2 score
-
200 g/km
Trunk score
423 L
14.9 cu ft
233 L
8.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
136 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleRenault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V TurboVolvo C30 2.4 i 20V
Consumption8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.00 LC100 km14.70 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.53 LC100 mi23.66 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,100 LC/year2,205 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo

  • Has 35 hp more
  • Has 70 Nm more
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 16 km/h (10 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 87 km (54 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 190 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest

Volvo C30 2.4 i 20V

  • Is 74 kg lighter

Pros

  • Lightest

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo
Volvo C30 2.4 i 20V
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 16V Turbo
2.0 i 16V GT
VS
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V TurbovsRenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT
2.4 i 20V
2.5 T5 20V
VS
VolvoC302.4 i 20VvsVolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V
2.0 16V Turbo
2.0 i 16V GT
VS
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V TurbovsRenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT
2.4 i 20V
2.0 16V TFSI
VS
VolvoC302.4 i 20VvsVolkswagenEos2.0 16V TFSI
2.0 16V Turbo
2.0 dCi FAP
VS
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V TurbovsRenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
2.4 i 20V
Cupra 1.4 TSI
VS
VolvoC302.4 i 20VvsSeatIbiza IV SCCupra 1.4 TSI
2.0 16V Turbo
2.0 dCi FAP
VS
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V TurbovsRenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP
2.4 i 20V
2.5 20V T
VS
VolvoC302.4 i 20VvsVolvoC70 Coupe2.5 20V T
2.0 16V Turbo
2.9 24V
VS
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V TurbovsRenaultLaguna2.9 24V
2.4 i 20V
1.3 Wankel
VS
VolvoC302.4 i 20VvsMazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
2.0 16V Turbo
2.9 24V
VS
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V TurbovsRenaultLaguna Grandtour2.9 24V
2.4 i 20V
1.8 TFSI
VS
VolvoC302.4 i 20VvsAUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)Facelift 20111.8 TFSI
Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo vs Volvo C30 2.4 i 20V - car comparison - FastVsFaster