Renault Espace V
Car comparison
Renault Espace V 1.8 TCevsVolvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo V40 Cross Country
2.0 T5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Espace V 1.8 TCe
- Fastest top speed224 km/h139 mph
- Most powerful225 hp168 kW
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight135 hp/t100 kW/t7.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions168 g/km
- Best estimated range784 km487 mi
- Best economy score87/100
Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Lightest1,624 kg3,580 lb
- Largest trunk335 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best practicality score75/100
Specification comparison
| Model | RenaultEspace V1.8 TCe | VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 225hp168kW | 213hp159kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,672kg3,686lb | 1,624kg3,580lb |
| Gross weight | 2,417kg5,329lb | 2,070kg4,564lb |
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 98.1s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 82.4s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.9s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 40.4s Calculated | 37.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.5s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK | 11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 135hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated | 131hp/t98kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 179Nm/t120lb-ft/ton Calculated | 185Nm/t124lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 784km487mi Calculated | 704km437mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,798cc110cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,857mm191in | 4,370mm172in |
| Width | 1,888mm74in | 1,857mm73in |
| Height | 1,677mm66in | 1,470mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,884mm114in | 2,646mm104in |
| Front track | 1,630mm64in | 1,552mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,621mm64in | 1,540mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 160mm6in | 145mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 247L | 335L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,035L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 7 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 57L |
| CO2 emissions | 168g/km | 189g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Renault Espace V 1.8 TCe: Power / Torque
- Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultEspace V1.8 TCe | 5,600 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 6,000 rpm | 2,700-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | RenaultEspace V1.8 TCe | VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.5 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.9 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 40.4 s | 37.6 s |
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 145 km/h 90 mph | 149 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultEspace V1.8 TCe | 225 hp 168 kW |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 213 hp 159 kW |
Renault Espace V 1.8 TCe has 12 hp more than Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5 and Renault Espace V 1.8 TCe: 12 hp (9 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultEspace V1.8 TCe | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultEspace V1.8 TCe | 1,672 kg 3,686 lb |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 1,624 kg 3,580 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultEspace V1.8 TCe | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultEspace V1.8 TCe | 7.9 s |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 7.2 s |
Although Renault Espace V 1.8 TCe has more power, Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5 and Renault Espace V 1.8 TCe: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultEspace V1.8 TCe | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Renault Espace V 1.8 TCe and Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultEspace V1.8 TCe | 135 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultEspace V1.8 TCe | 784 km 487 mi |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 704 km 437 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultEspace V1.8 TCe | 225 hp 168 kW | 7.9 s | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 213 hp 159 kW | 7.2 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultEspace V1.8 TCe |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultEspace V1.8 TCe |
| 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 |
| 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultEspace V1.8 TCe | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultEspace V1.8 TCe | 135 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | RenaultEspace V1.8 TCe | VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 225 hp 168 kW | 213 hp 159 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.9 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,672 kg 3,686 lb | 1,624 kg 3,580 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 784 km 487 mi | 704 km 437 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 168 g/km | 189 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 247 L 8.7 cu ft | 335 L 11.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 135 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Renault Espace V 1.8 TCe | Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK | 8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.95 LC100 km | 14.17 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.84 LC100 mi | 22.81 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal | 1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,943 LC/year | 2,126 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Renault Espace V 1.8 TCe
- Has 12 hp more
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 80 km (50 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 21 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5
- Is 48 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 88 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























