Renault Espace IV (PHASE II)
Car comparison
Renault Espace IV (PHASE II) 3.5 V6vsRenault Espace V 1.6 TCe
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Espace V
1.6 TCe
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Espace IV (PHASE II) 3.5 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.1 s
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph
- Most powerful241 hp180 kW
- Highest torque330 Nm243 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight131 hp/t97 kW/t7.7 kg/hp
- Largest trunk291 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score49/100
- Best practicality score80/100
Renault Espace V 1.6 TCe
- Lightest1,609 kg3,547 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions140 g/km
- Best estimated range935 km581 mi
- Best economy score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6 | RenaultEspace V1.6 TCe |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 241hp180kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 330Nm243lb-ft | 260Nm192lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,845kg4,068lb | 1,609kg3,547lb |
| Gross weight | 2,545kg5,611lb | 2,410kg5,313lb |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 211 km/h 131 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 109.6s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 99.3s99% target: 209 km/h / 130 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.1s | 8.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 43.0s Calculated | 57.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.6s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 17.2L/100 km13.7mpg US16.4mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.9s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 131hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated | 124hp/t93kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 179Nm/t120lb-ft/ton Calculated | 162Nm/t108lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 692km430mi Calculated | 935km581mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,498cc213cu in | 1,618cc99cu in |
| Length | 4,656mm183in | 4,857mm191in |
| Width | 1,860mm73in | 1,888mm74in |
| Height | 1,728mm68in | 1,677mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,803mm110in | 2,884mm114in |
| Front track | 1,574mm62in | 1,630mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,556mm61in | 1,621mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 120mm5in | 160mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 291L | 247L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,860L | 2,035L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 7 | 7 |
| Fuel tank | 83L | 58L |
| CO2 emissions | 284g/km | 140g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Renault Espace IV (PHASE II) 3.5 V6: Power / Torque
- Renault Espace V 1.6 TCe: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6 | 6,000 rpm | 3,600 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| RenaultEspace V1.6 TCe | 5,750 rpm | 2,500 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6 | RenaultEspace V1.6 TCe |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.6 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.1 s | 8.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 43.0 s | 57.2 s |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 211 km/h 131 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.3 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.9 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 142 km/h 88 mph | 139 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6 | 241 hp 180 kW |
| RenaultEspace V1.6 TCe | 200 hp 149 kW |
Renault Espace IV (PHASE II) 3.5 V6 has 41 hp more than Renault Espace V 1.6 TCe.
The biggest power difference is between Renault Espace V 1.6 TCe and Renault Espace IV (PHASE II) 3.5 V6: 41 hp (31 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6 | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
| RenaultEspace V1.6 TCe | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6 | 1,845 kg 4,068 lb |
| RenaultEspace V1.6 TCe | 1,609 kg 3,547 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6 | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| RenaultEspace V1.6 TCe | 211 km/h 131 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6 | 8.1 s |
| RenaultEspace V1.6 TCe | 8.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Espace IV (PHASE II) 3.5 V6 and Renault Espace V 1.6 TCe: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6 | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
| RenaultEspace V1.6 TCe | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Renault Espace V 1.6 TCe and Renault Espace IV (PHASE II) 3.5 V6: 5.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6 | 131 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
| RenaultEspace V1.6 TCe | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6 | 692 km 430 mi |
| RenaultEspace V1.6 TCe | 935 km 581 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6 | 241 hp 180 kW | 8.1 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| RenaultEspace V1.6 TCe | 200 hp 149 kW | 8.6 s | 211 km/h 131 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultEspace V1.6 TCe |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6 |
| 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| RenaultEspace V1.6 TCe |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Renault Espace IV (PHASE II) 3.5 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6 | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | 8.1 s |
| RenaultEspace V1.6 TCe | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6 | 131 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
| RenaultEspace V1.6 TCe | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6 | RenaultEspace V1.6 TCe | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 241 hp 180 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.1 s | 8.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 211 km/h 131 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,845 kg 4,068 lb | 1,609 kg 3,547 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 692 km 430 mi | 935 km 581 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 284 g/km | 140 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 291 L 10.3 cu ft | 247 L 8.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 131 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Renault Espace IV (PHASE II) 3.5 V6 | Renault Espace V 1.6 TCe |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.00 LC100 km | 10.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 33.80 LC100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,800 L476 US gal396 UK gal | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,150 LC/year | 1,628 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Renault Espace IV (PHASE II) 3.5 V6
- Has 41 hp more
- Has 70 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 14 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 44 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Renault Espace V 1.6 TCe
- Is 236 kg lighter
- Uses 5.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 244 km (152 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 144 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























