AUDI A1 citycarver (GB)
Car comparison
AUDI A1 citycarver (GB) 35 TFSIvsRenault Espace V 1.6 TCe
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Espace V
1.6 TCe
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A1 citycarver (GB) 35 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.2 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph
- Lightest1,205 kg2,657 lb
- Best power-to-weight124 hp/t93 kW/t8.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions122 g/km
- Largest trunk335 L
- Best overall score55/100
- Best performance score46/100
- Best economy score92/100
- Best practicality score75/100
Renault Espace V 1.6 TCe
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Highest torque260 Nm192 lb-ft
- Best estimated range935 km581 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | RenaultEspace V1.6 TCe |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 260Nm192lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,205kg2,657lb | 1,609kg3,547lb |
| Gross weight | 1,740kg3,836lb | 2,410kg5,313lb |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 211 km/h 131 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 85.6s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 99.3s99% target: 209 km/h / 130 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.2s | 8.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 40.3s Calculated | 57.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.8s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.0s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 124hp/t93kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 124hp/t93kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 207Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated | 162Nm/t108lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 741km460mi Calculated | 935km581mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,498cc91cu in | 1,618cc99cu in |
| Length | 4,046mm159in | 4,857mm191in |
| Width | 1,756mm69in | 1,888mm74in |
| Height | 1,483mm58in | 1,677mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,566mm101in | 2,884mm114in |
| Front track | 1,523mm60in | 1,630mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,505mm59in | 1,621mm64in |
| Ground clearance | - | 160mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 335L | 247L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 2,035L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 7 |
| Fuel tank | 40L | 58L |
| CO2 emissions | 122g/km | 140g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A1 citycarver (GB) 35 TFSI: Power / Torque
- Renault Espace V 1.6 TCe: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,500-3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| RenaultEspace V1.6 TCe | 5,750 rpm | 2,500 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | RenaultEspace V1.6 TCe |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.8 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.2 s | 8.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 40.3 s | 57.2 s |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 211 km/h 131 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.4 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.0 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 145 km/h 90 mph | 139 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 150 hp 112 kW |
| RenaultEspace V1.6 TCe | 200 hp 149 kW |
Renault Espace V 1.6 TCe has 50 hp more than AUDI A1 citycarver (GB) 35 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI A1 citycarver (GB) 35 TFSI and Renault Espace V 1.6 TCe: 50 hp (37 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| RenaultEspace V1.6 TCe | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 1,205 kg 2,657 lb |
| RenaultEspace V1.6 TCe | 1,609 kg 3,547 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| RenaultEspace V1.6 TCe | 211 km/h 131 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 8.2 s |
| RenaultEspace V1.6 TCe | 8.6 s |
Although Renault Espace V 1.6 TCe has more power, AUDI A1 citycarver (GB) 35 TFSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A1 citycarver (GB) 35 TFSI and Renault Espace V 1.6 TCe: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
| RenaultEspace V1.6 TCe | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI A1 citycarver (GB) 35 TFSI and Renault Espace V 1.6 TCe: 0.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
| RenaultEspace V1.6 TCe | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 741 km 460 mi |
| RenaultEspace V1.6 TCe | 935 km 581 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.2 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| RenaultEspace V1.6 TCe | 200 hp 149 kW | 8.6 s | 211 km/h 131 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultEspace V1.6 TCe |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI |
| 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| RenaultEspace V1.6 TCe |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A1 citycarver (GB) 35 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
| RenaultEspace V1.6 TCe | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
| RenaultEspace V1.6 TCe | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | RenaultEspace V1.6 TCe | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.2 s | 8.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 211 km/h 131 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,205 kg 2,657 lb | 1,609 kg 3,547 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 741 km 460 mi | 935 km 581 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 122 g/km | 140 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 335 L 11.8 cu ft | 247 L 8.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A1 citycarver (GB) 35 TFSI | Renault Espace V 1.6 TCe |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.45 LC100 km | 10.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.21 LC100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 810 L214 US gal178 UK gal | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,418 LC/year | 1,628 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A1 citycarver (GB) 35 TFSI
- Is 404 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 0 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 88 L more trunk volume
- Emits 18 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Renault Espace V 1.6 TCe
- Has 50 hp more
- Has 10 Nm more
- Has 195 km (121 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























