Car comparison

Skoda Octavia II RS 2.0 TFSIvsRenault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Octavia II

RS 2.0 TFSI

200 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedHatchback2005-2008
VS

Renault Clio III (PHASE I)

RS 2.0 16V

197 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDManualNaturally aspiratedHatchback2006-2009

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Skoda Octavia II RS 2.0 TFSI

  • Fastest top speed
    240 km/h
    149 mph
  • Most powerful
    200 hp
    149 kW
  • Highest torque
    280 Nm
    207 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.8 L/100 km
    30.2 mpg US
    36.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    10.9 L/100 km
    21.6 mpg US
    25.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.0 L/100 km
    39.2 mpg US
    47.1 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    705 km
    438 mi
  • Largest trunk
    560 L
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    52/100
  • Best economy score
    86/100
  • Best practicality score
    81/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaOctavia IIRS 2.0 TFSIRenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
Power
200hp149kW
197hp147kW
Torque
280Nm207lb-ft
215Nm159lb-ft
Curb weight
1,475kg3,252lb
1,260kg2,778lb
Gross weight
1,940kg4,277lb
1,690kg3,726lb
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
To 99% top speed
86.7s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
70.1s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.3s
6.9s
0-200 km/h
29.2s
Calculated
37.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.9s
Calculated
6.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK
12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.2s
Calculated
15.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
136hp/t101kW/t62hp/1000 lb
Calculated
156hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
190Nm/t127lb-ft/ton
Calculated
171Nm/t114lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
705km438mi
Calculated
618km384mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,578mm180in
3,991mm157in
Width
1,769mm70in
1,768mm70in
Height
1,462mm58in
1,477mm58in
Wheelbase
2,578mm101in
2,585mm102in
Front track
1,539mm61in
1,370mm54in
Rear track
1,539mm61in
1,360mm54in
Ground clearance-
113mm4in
Trunk volume
560L
288L
Max trunk volume
1,350L
1,028L
Doors
5
3
Seats
5
4
Fuel tank
55L
55L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Skoda Octavia II RS 2.0 TFSIRenault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16VPowerTorque
  • Skoda Octavia II RS 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
  • Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SkodaOctavia IIRS 2.0 TFSI5,100 rpm1,800 rpm5,350 rpm
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V7,250 rpm5,550 rpm7,500 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaOctavia IIRS 2.0 TFSIRenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.9 s
6.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.3 s
6.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
29.2 s
37.1 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
9.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.8 s
12.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.2 s
15.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
153 km/h
95 mph
152 km/h
94 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia IIRS 2.0 TFSI
200 hp
149 kW
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
197 hp
147 kW

Skoda Octavia II RS 2.0 TFSI has 3 hp more than Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V.

The biggest power difference is between Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V and Skoda Octavia II RS 2.0 TFSI: 3 hp (2 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia IIRS 2.0 TFSI
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
215 Nm
159 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia IIRS 2.0 TFSI
1,475 kg
3,252 lb
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
1,260 kg
2,778 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia IIRS 2.0 TFSI
240 km/h
149 mph
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
215 km/h
134 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia IIRS 2.0 TFSI7.3 s
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V6.9 s

Although Skoda Octavia II RS 2.0 TFSI has more power, Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V and Skoda Octavia II RS 2.0 TFSI: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia IIRS 2.0 TFSI
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Octavia II RS 2.0 TFSI and Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V: 1.1 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia IIRS 2.0 TFSI
136 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
156 hp/t
117 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia IIRS 2.0 TFSI
705 km
438 mi
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
618 km
384 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaOctavia IIRS 2.0 TFSI
200 hp
149 kW
7.3 s
240 km/h
149 mph
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
197 hp
147 kW
6.9 s
215 km/h
134 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaOctavia IIRS 2.0 TFSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
560 L
19.8 cu ft
Length
4,578 mm
180.2 in
Height
1,462 mm
57.6 in
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
Power
197 hp
147 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
288 L
10.2 cu ft
Length
3,991 mm
157.1 in
Height
1,477 mm
58.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SkodaOctavia IIRS 2.0 TFSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
Power
197 hp
147 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK

Skoda Octavia II RS 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SkodaOctavia IIRS 2.0 TFSI
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
7.3 s
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK
6.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SkodaOctavia IIRS 2.0 TFSI
136 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
156 hp/t
117 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaOctavia IIRS 2.0 TFSIRenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
Power
200 hp
149 kW
197 hp
147 kW
Torque
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
215 Nm
159 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.3 s
6.9 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Lightness
1,475 kg
3,252 lb
1,260 kg
2,778 lb
Fuel consumption
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
560 L
19.8 cu ft
Length
4,578 mm
180.2 in
Height
1,462 mm
57.6 in
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
288 L
10.2 cu ft
Length
3,991 mm
157.1 in
Height
1,477 mm
58.1 in
Range score
705 km
438 mi
618 km
384 mi
Trunk score
560 L
19.8 cu ft
288 L
10.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
136 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
156 hp/t
117 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSkoda Octavia II RS 2.0 TFSIRenault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V
Consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.65 LC100 km15.58 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.97 LC100 mi25.07 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal1,335 L353 US gal294 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,048 LC/year2,336 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Octavia II RS 2.0 TFSI

  • Has 3 hp more
  • Has 65 Nm more
  • Has 25 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 87 km (54 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 272 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest

Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V

  • Is 215 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 21 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Octavia II RS 2.0 TFSI
Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

RS 2.0 TFSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
SkodaOctavia IIRS 2.0 TFSIvsAUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20052.0 TFSI
RS 2.0 16V
RS 2.0 16V
VS
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16VvsRenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V
RS 2.0 TFSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
SkodaOctavia IIRS 2.0 TFSIvsAUDIA3 Sportback (8PA)2.0 TFSI
RS 2.0 16V
2.0 16V Sport
VS
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16VvsRenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport
RS 2.0 TFSI
GTI 2.0 TFSI
VS
SkodaOctavia IIRS 2.0 TFSIvsVolkswagenGolf V (5-DOOR)GTI 2.0 TFSI
RS 2.0 16V
3.0 V6
VS
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16VvsRenaultClio Sport (PHASE I)3.0 V6
RS 2.0 TFSI
GTI 2.0 TFSI
VS
SkodaOctavia IIRS 2.0 TFSIvsVolkswagenGolf V (3-DOOR)GTI 2.0 TFSI
RS 2.0 16V
3.0i V6 24V
VS
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16VvsRenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24V
RS 2.0 TFSI
FR 2.0 TFSI
VS
SkodaOctavia IIRS 2.0 TFSIvsSeatLeon II (1P)FR 2.0 TFSI
RS 2.0 16V
2.0 i 16V GT
VS
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16VvsRenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT
RS 2.0 16V
RS 2.0 16V
VS
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16VvsRenaultMegane II (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V
RS 2.0 TFSI
A 200 Turbo
VS
SkodaOctavia IIRS 2.0 TFSIvsMercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo
Skoda Octavia II RS 2.0 TFSI vs Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V - car comparison - FastVsFaster