Skoda Octavia II
Car comparison
Skoda Octavia II RS 2.0 TFSIvsMercedes-Benz A-class (W169) A 200 Turbo
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz A-class (W169)
A 200 Turbo
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Octavia II RS 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Highest torque280 Nm207 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range705 km438 mi
- Largest trunk560 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score81/100
Mercedes-Benz A-class (W169) A 200 Turbo
- Lightest1,305 kg2,877 lb
- Best power-to-weight148 hp/t110 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaOctavia IIRS 2.0 TFSI | Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 193hp144kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,475kg3,252lb | 1,305kg2,877lb |
| Gross weight | 1,940kg4,277lb | 1,730kg3,814lb |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 86.7s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 76.8s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.2s Calculated | 36.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 136hp/t101kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated | 148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 190Nm/t127lb-ft/ton Calculated | 215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 705km438mi Calculated | 684km425mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 2,034cc124cu in |
| Length | 4,578mm180in | 3,838mm151in |
| Width | 1,769mm70in | 1,764mm69in |
| Height | 1,462mm58in | 1,595mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,578mm101in | 2,568mm101in |
| Front track | 1,539mm61in | 1,552mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,539mm61in | 1,547mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 560L | 435L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,350L | 1,995L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 54L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Octavia II RS 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz A-class (W169) A 200 Turbo: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIRS 2.0 TFSI | 5,100 rpm | 1,800 rpm | 5,350 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | 5,000 rpm | 1,800 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaOctavia IIRS 2.0 TFSI | Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.2 s | 36.0 s |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 153 km/h 95 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIRS 2.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | 193 hp 144 kW |
Skoda Octavia II RS 2.0 TFSI has 7 hp more than Mercedes-Benz A-class (W169) A 200 Turbo.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz A-class (W169) A 200 Turbo and Skoda Octavia II RS 2.0 TFSI: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIRS 2.0 TFSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIRS 2.0 TFSI | 1,475 kg 3,252 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | 1,305 kg 2,877 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIRS 2.0 TFSI | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIRS 2.0 TFSI | 7.3 s |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | 7.3 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIRS 2.0 TFSI | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIRS 2.0 TFSI | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIRS 2.0 TFSI | 705 km 438 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | 684 km 425 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIRS 2.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.3 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | 193 hp 144 kW | 7.3 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIRS 2.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIRS 2.0 TFSI |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo |
| 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Skoda Octavia II RS 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIRS 2.0 TFSI | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIRS 2.0 TFSI | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaOctavia IIRS 2.0 TFSI | Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 193 hp 144 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,475 kg 3,252 lb | 1,305 kg 2,877 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 705 km 438 mi | 684 km 425 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 560 L 19.8 cu ft | 435 L 15.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Octavia II RS 2.0 TFSI | Mercedes-Benz A-class (W169) A 200 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.65 LC100 km | 13.83 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,048 LC/year | 2,074 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Octavia II RS 2.0 TFSI
- Has 7 hp more
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 22 km (13 mi) more estimated range
- Has 125 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Mercedes-Benz A-class (W169) A 200 Turbo
- Is 170 kg lighter
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























