Renault Clio III (PHASE I)
Car comparison
Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16VvsRenault Megane III (PHASE II) GT 2.0 TCe
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Megane III (PHASE II)
GT 2.0 TCe
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Megane III (PHASE II) GT 2.0 TCe
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range779 km484 mi
- Largest trunk405 L
- Best overall score55/100
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score75/100
Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Fastest top speed215 km/h134 mph
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Lightest1,240 kg2,734 lb
- Best power-to-weight161 hp/t120 kW/t6.2 kg/hp
- Best performance score50/100
Specification comparison
| Model | RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V | RenaultMegane III (PHASE II)GT 2.0 TCe |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 215Nm159lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,240kg2,734lb | 1,326kg2,923lb |
| Gross weight | 1,690kg3,726lb | 1,854kg4,087lb |
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 69.4s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated | 87.1s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 36.8s Calculated | 46.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 8.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.0s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 161hp/t120kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated | 136hp/t101kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 173Nm/t116lb-ft/ton Calculated | 226Nm/t151lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 618km384mi Calculated | 779km484mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 3,991mm157in | 4,295mm169in |
| Width | 1,768mm70in | 1,808mm71in |
| Height | 1,477mm58in | 1,471mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,585mm102in | 2,641mm104in |
| Front track | 1,520mm60in | 1,546mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,520mm60in | 1,547mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 120mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 288L | 405L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,028L | 1,162L |
| Doors | 3 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 178g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V: Power / Torque
- Renault Megane III (PHASE II) GT 2.0 TCe: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V | 7,250 rpm | 5,500 rpm | 7,500 rpm |
| RenaultMegane III (PHASE II)GT 2.0 TCe | 5,500 rpm | 2,250 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V | RenaultMegane III (PHASE II)GT 2.0 TCe |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 8.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 36.8 s | 46.0 s |
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.0 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 94 mph | 142 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V | 200 hp 149 kW |
| RenaultMegane III (PHASE II)GT 2.0 TCe | 180 hp 134 kW |
Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V has 20 hp more than Renault Megane III (PHASE II) GT 2.0 TCe.
The biggest power difference is between Renault Megane III (PHASE II) GT 2.0 TCe and Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V | 215 Nm 159 lb-ft |
| RenaultMegane III (PHASE II)GT 2.0 TCe | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V | 1,240 kg 2,734 lb |
| RenaultMegane III (PHASE II)GT 2.0 TCe | 1,326 kg 2,923 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| RenaultMegane III (PHASE II)GT 2.0 TCe | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V | 6.9 s |
| RenaultMegane III (PHASE II)GT 2.0 TCe | 8.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V and Renault Megane III (PHASE II) GT 2.0 TCe: 1.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
| RenaultMegane III (PHASE II)GT 2.0 TCe | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Renault Megane III (PHASE II) GT 2.0 TCe and Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V: 1.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
| RenaultMegane III (PHASE II)GT 2.0 TCe | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V | 618 km 384 mi |
| RenaultMegane III (PHASE II)GT 2.0 TCe | 779 km 484 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V | 200 hp 149 kW | 6.9 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| RenaultMegane III (PHASE II)GT 2.0 TCe | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.5 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultMegane III (PHASE II)GT 2.0 TCe |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V |
| 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| RenaultMegane III (PHASE II)GT 2.0 TCe |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| RenaultMegane III (PHASE II)GT 2.0 TCe | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
| RenaultMegane III (PHASE II)GT 2.0 TCe | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V | RenaultMegane III (PHASE II)GT 2.0 TCe | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 215 Nm 159 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,240 kg 2,734 lb | 1,326 kg 2,923 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 618 km 384 mi | 779 km 484 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 178 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 288 L 10.2 cu ft | 405 L 14.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V | Renault Megane III (PHASE II) GT 2.0 TCe |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.58 LC100 km | 13.48 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.07 LC100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,335 L353 US gal294 UK gal | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,336 LC/year | 2,021 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V
- Has 20 hp more
- Is 86 kg lighter
- Is 1.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 26 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Renault Megane III (PHASE II) GT 2.0 TCe
- Has 85 Nm more
- Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 161 km (100 mi) more estimated range
- Has 117 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























