Car comparison

Renault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16VvsRenault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Renault Megane II

RS 2.0 Turbo 16V

224 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedHatchback2004-2005
VS

Renault Clio III (PHASE I)

RS 2.0 16V

200 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDManualNaturally aspiratedHatchback2008-2009

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Renault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16V

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    236 km/h
    147 mph
  • Most powerful
    224 hp
    167 kW
  • Highest torque
    300 Nm
    221 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    163 hp/t
    121 kW/t
    6.1 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.8 L/100 km
    26.7 mpg US
    32.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    11.5 L/100 km
    20.5 mpg US
    24.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.0 L/100 km
    33.6 mpg US
    40.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    682 km
    424 mi
  • Largest trunk
    330 L
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    56/100
  • Best economy score
    83/100
  • Best practicality score
    72/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelRenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16VRenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
Power
224hp167kW
200hp149kW
Torque
300Nm221lb-ft
215Nm159lb-ft
Curb weight
1,375kg3,031lb
1,240kg2,734lb
Gross weight
1,820kg4,012lb
1,690kg3,726lb
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
To 99% top speed
72.4s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
69.4s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.5s
6.9s
0-200 km/h
26.2s
Calculated
36.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.2s
Calculated
6.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK
8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK
12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.6s
Calculated
15.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
163hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb
Calculated
161hp/t120kW/t73hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
218Nm/t146lb-ft/ton
Calculated
173Nm/t116lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
682km424mi
Calculated
618km384mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,228mm166in
3,991mm157in
Width-
1,768mm70in
Height
1,436mm57in
1,477mm58in
Wheelbase
2,617mm103in
2,585mm102in
Front track
1,517mm60in
1,520mm60in
Rear track
1,521mm60in
1,520mm60in
Trunk volume
330L
288L
Max trunk volume
1,190L
1,028L
Doors
5
3
Seats
5
4
Fuel tank
60L
55L
CO2 emissions
209g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Renault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16VRenault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16VPowerTorque
  • Renault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16V: Power / Torque
  • Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V5,500 rpm3,000 rpm5,750 rpm
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V7,250 rpm5,500 rpm7,500 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricRenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16VRenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.2 s
6.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.5 s
6.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
26.2 s
36.8 s
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.4 s
6.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.5 s
9.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.3 s
12.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.6 s
15.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
159 km/h
99 mph
152 km/h
94 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V
224 hp
167 kW
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
200 hp
149 kW

Renault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16V has 24 hp more than Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V.

The biggest power difference is between Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V and Renault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16V: 24 hp (18 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
215 Nm
159 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V
1,375 kg
3,031 lb
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
1,240 kg
2,734 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V
236 km/h
147 mph
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
215 km/h
134 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V6.5 s
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V6.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16V and Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V
163 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
161 hp/t
120 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V
682 km
424 mi
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
618 km
384 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V
224 hp
167 kW
6.5 s
236 km/h
147 mph
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
200 hp
149 kW
6.9 s
215 km/h
134 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V
Power
224 hp
167 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Length
4,228 mm
166.5 in
Height
1,436 mm
56.5 in
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
288 L
10.2 cu ft
Length
3,991 mm
157.1 in
Height
1,477 mm
58.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V
Power
224 hp
167 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK

Renault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK
6.5 s
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK
6.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V
163 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
161 hp/t
120 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleRenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16VRenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
Power
224 hp
167 kW
200 hp
149 kW
Torque
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
215 Nm
159 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.5 s
6.9 s
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Lightness
1,375 kg
3,031 lb
1,240 kg
2,734 lb
Fuel consumption
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Length
4,228 mm
166.5 in
Height
1,436 mm
56.5 in
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
288 L
10.2 cu ft
Length
3,991 mm
157.1 in
Height
1,477 mm
58.1 in
Range score
682 km
424 mi
618 km
384 mi
CO2 score
209 g/km
-
Trunk score
330 L
11.7 cu ft
288 L
10.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
163 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp
161 hp/t
120 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleRenault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16VRenault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V
Consumption8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km15.40 LC100 km15.58 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi24.78 LC100 mi25.07 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,320 L349 US gal290 UK gal1,335 L353 US gal294 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,310 LC/year2,336 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Renault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16V

  • Has 24 hp more
  • Has 85 Nm more
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 21 km/h (13 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 64 km (40 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 42 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Renault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
RS 2.0 16V
VS
RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16VvsRenaultMegane II (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V
RS 2.0 16V
RS 2.0 16V
VS
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16VvsRenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V
RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
VS
RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16VvsRenaultMegane II CoupeRS 2.0 Turbo 16V
RS 2.0 16V
2.0 16V Sport
VS
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16VvsRenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport
RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
GT 2.0 TCe
VS
RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16VvsRenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe
RS 2.0 16V
3.0 V6
VS
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16VvsRenaultClio Sport (PHASE I)3.0 V6
RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
RS 2.0 16V
VS
RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16VvsRenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V
RS 2.0 16V
3.0i V6 24V
VS
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16VvsRenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24V
RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
GT 1.6 Energy TCe
VS
RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16VvsRenaultMegane IVGT 1.6 Energy TCe
RS 2.0 16V
2.0 i 16V GT
VS
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16VvsRenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT
RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
GT 2.0 TCe
VS
RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16VvsRenaultMegane III (PHASE II)GT 2.0 TCe
RS 2.0 16V
2.0 dCi FAP
VS
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16VvsRenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
Renault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16V vs Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V - car comparison - FastVsFaster