Car comparison

Porsche Macan I (95B) · Facelift 2018 2.0vsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 B5

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Porsche Macan I (95B) · Facelift 2018

2.0

245 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2018-2021
VS

Volvo XC60 II

2.0 B5

235 hp1969 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2019-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    225 km/h
    140 mph
  • Most powerful
    245 hp
    183 kW
  • Lightest
    1,795 kg
    3,957 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    136 hp/t
    102 kW/t
    7.3 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    64/100
  • Best performance score
    54/100

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5

  • Highest torque
    480 Nm
    354 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.9 L/100 km
    39.9 mpg US
    47.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    155 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,203 km
    748 mi
  • Largest trunk
    505 L
  • Best economy score
    91/100
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5
Power
245hp183kW
235hp175kW
Torque
370Nm273lb-ft
480Nm354lb-ft
Curb weight
1,795kg3,957lb
1,950kg4,299lb
Gross weight
2,510kg5,534lb
-
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
To 99% top speed
78.1s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
79.9s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.7s
7.1s
0-200 km/h
32.3s
Calculated
36.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.3s
Calculated
6.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
14.8s
Calculated
15.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
136hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb
Calculated
121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
206Nm/t138lb-ft/ton
Calculated
246Nm/t165lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
802km499mi
Calculated
1,203km748mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,696mm185in
4,688mm185in
Width
1,923mm76in
1,902mm75in
Height
1,624mm64in
1,658mm65in
Wheelbase
2,807mm111in
2,865mm113in
Front track
1,655mm65in
1,668mm66in
Rear track
1,651mm65in
1,673mm66in
Ground clearance
205mm8in
216mm9in
Trunk volume
500L
505L
Max trunk volume
1,500L
1,432L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
65L
71L
CO2 emissions
185g/km
155g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5PowerTorque
  • Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.05,000-6,750 rpm1,600-4,500 rpm7,000 rpm
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B54,000 rpm1,740-2,280 rpm5,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.3 s
6.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.7 s
7.1 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
32.3 s
36.7 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.3 s
6.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.6 s
9.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.4 s
12.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.8 s
15.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
153 km/h
95 mph
150 km/h
93 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
245 hp
183 kW
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5
235 hp
175 kW

Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0 has 10 hp more than Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5.

The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5 and Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
370 Nm
273 lb-ft
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5
480 Nm
354 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
1,795 kg
3,957 lb
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5
1,950 kg
4,299 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
225 km/h
140 mph
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5
220 km/h
137 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.06.7 s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B57.1 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0 and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5 and Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0: 2.2 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
136 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
802 km
499 mi
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5
1,203 km
748 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
245 hp
183 kW
6.7 s
225 km/h
140 mph
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5
235 hp
175 kW
7.1 s
220 km/h
137 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
Power
245 hp
183 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,696 mm
184.9 in
Height
1,624 mm
63.9 in
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5
Power
235 hp
175 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
Power
245 hp
183 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5
Power
235 hp
175 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
6.7 s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
7.1 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
136 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehiclePorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5
Power
245 hp
183 kW
235 hp
175 kW
Torque
370 Nm
273 lb-ft
480 Nm
354 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.7 s
7.1 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
Lightness
1,795 kg
3,957 lb
1,950 kg
4,299 lb
Fuel consumption
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,696 mm
184.9 in
Height
1,624 mm
63.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
Range score
802 km
499 mi
1,203 km
748 mi
CO2 score
185 g/km
155 g/km
Trunk score
500 L
17.7 cu ft
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
136 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehiclePorsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5
Consumption8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.17 LC100 km10.33 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.81 LC100 mi16.62 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal885 L234 US gal195 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,126 LC/year1,549 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Is 155 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5

  • Has 110 Nm more
  • Uses 2.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 401 km (249 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 5 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 30 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0
2.0
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0vsPorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
2.0 B5
2.0 D5
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
2.0
2.0
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0vsPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20212.0
2.0 B5
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5vsVolvoXC402.0 T5
2.0
3.0 diesel V6
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0vsPorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.0 diesel V6
2.0 B5
25d
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5vsJaguarF-Pace25d
2.0
45 TFSI
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TFSI
2.0 B5
380TSI
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5vsVolkswagenTayron I380TSI
2.0
2.0 BiTDI
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0vsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
2.0 B5
45 TDI V6
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5vsAUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI V6
2.0 B5
2.0i
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5vsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
2.0
2.0 P250
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0vsJaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
Porsche Macan I (95B) · Facelift 2018 2.0 vs Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5 - car comparison - FastVsFaster