Porsche Cayman (981C)
Car comparison
Porsche Cayman (981C) S 3.4vsPorsche Cayman (987C) S 3.4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche Cayman (987C)
S 3.4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche Cayman (981C) S 3.4
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.0 s
- Fastest top speed283 km/h176 mph
- Most powerful325 hp242 kW
- Highest torque370 Nm273 lb-ft
- Lightest1,340 kg2,954 lb
- Best power-to-weight243 hp/t181 kW/t4.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.0 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption12.7 L/100 km18.5 mpg US22.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions211 g/km
- Best estimated range711 km442 mi
- Largest trunk425 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score71/100
- Best economy score83/100
- Best practicality score42/100
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 | PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 325hp242kW | 295hp220kW |
| Torque | 370Nm273lb-ft | 340Nm251lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,340kg2,954lb | 1,390kg3,064lb |
| Gross weight | 1,665kg3,671lb | 1,670kg3,682lb |
| Top speed | 283 km/h 176 mph | 267 km/h 166 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 67.4s99% target: 280 km/h / 174 mph Calculated | 88.3s99% target: 264 km/h / 164 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.0s | 6.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.7s Calculated | 21.6s |
| 0-60 mph | 4.8s Calculated | 5.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.7L/100 km18.5mpg US22.2mpg UK | 16.3L/100 km14.4mpg US17.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.0s Calculated | 14.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 243hp/t181kW/t110hp/1000 lb Calculated | 212hp/t158kW/t96hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 276Nm/t185lb-ft/ton Calculated | 245Nm/t164lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 711km442mi Calculated | 582km362mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,436cc210cu in | 3,386cc207cu in |
| Length | 4,380mm172in | 4,341mm171in |
| Width | 1,801mm71in | 1,801mm71in |
| Height | 1,295mm51in | 1,305mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,475mm97in | 2,415mm95in |
| Front track | - | 1,486mm59in |
| Rear track | - | 1,528mm60in |
| Ground clearance | - | 121mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 425L | 260L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 64L |
| CO2 emissions | 211g/km | 262g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Cayman (981C) S 3.4: Power / Torque
- Porsche Cayman (987C) S 3.4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 | 7,400 rpm | 4,500-5,800 rpm | 7,650 rpm |
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | 6,250 rpm | 4,400-6,000 rpm | 7,300 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 | PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.8 s | 5.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.0 s | 6.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.7 s | 21.6 s |
| Top speed | 283 km/h 176 mph | 267 km/h 166 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.6 s | 9.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.0 s | 11.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.0 s | 14.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 183 km/h 113 mph | 165 km/h 103 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 | 325 hp 242 kW |
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | 295 hp 220 kW |
Porsche Cayman (981C) S 3.4 has 30 hp more than Porsche Cayman (987C) S 3.4.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche Cayman (987C) S 3.4 and Porsche Cayman (981C) S 3.4: 30 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 | 1,340 kg 2,954 lb |
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | 1,390 kg 3,064 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 | 283 km/h 176 mph |
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | 267 km/h 166 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 | 5.0 s |
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | 6.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Cayman (981C) S 3.4 and Porsche Cayman (987C) S 3.4: 1.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche Cayman (981C) S 3.4 and Porsche Cayman (987C) S 3.4: 2.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 | 243 hp/t 181 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | 212 hp/t 158 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 | 711 km 442 mi |
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | 582 km 362 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 | 325 hp 242 kW | 5.0 s | 283 km/h 176 mph |
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | 295 hp 220 kW | 6.1 s | 267 km/h 166 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 |
| 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 |
| 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche Cayman (981C) S 3.4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | 5.0 s |
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 | 243 hp/t 181 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | 212 hp/t 158 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 | PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 325 hp 242 kW | 295 hp 220 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.0 s | 6.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 283 km/h 176 mph | 267 km/h 166 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,340 kg 2,954 lb | 1,390 kg 3,064 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 711 km 442 mi | 582 km 362 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 211 g/km | 262 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 425 L 15.0 cu ft | 260 L 9.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 243 hp/t 181 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 212 hp/t 158 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Cayman (981C) S 3.4 | Porsche Cayman (987C) S 3.4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK | 11 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.75 LC100 km | 19.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.35 LC100 mi | 30.98 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,350 L357 US gal297 UK gal | 1,650 L436 US gal363 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,363 LC/year | 2,888 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Cayman (981C) S 3.4
- Has 30 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 50 kg lighter
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 16 km/h (10 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 30 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 129 km (80 mi) more estimated range
- Has 165 L more trunk volume
- Emits 51 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Porsche Cayman (987C) S 3.4
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























